Normal Topic St George theory and praxis (Read 4683 times)
thibdb13
God Member
*****
Offline


Tal was the best

Posts: 974
Location: Mechelen
Joined: 01/25/07
Gender: Male
Re: St George theory and praxis
Reply #3 - 08/20/07 at 20:03:19
Post Tools
[quote author=Michael Ayton link=1165888029/0#0 date=1165888029]There are not too many Forum threads on the St George so I thought I’d open a new one. I’ve been having a look at some of the critical(?) lines and would be interested to hear people’s views.

One key question, I guess, is whether one should see the point of the defence as being to reach ‘Basman Gambit’ positions, or whether other lines are just as reasonable for Black. The Gambit is typically (usually?) reached via 1 e4 a6 2 d4 e6!? 3 c4 b5 4 cb ab 5 Bb5 Bb7. Does anybody know what best play is meant to be here and what the current assessment is? As a related question, after 1 e4 a6 2 d4 b5!? 3 c4 (or 1 d4 a6 2 c4 b5 3 e4), is 3 …Bb7 inferior, or not?

My second question concerns the main-line position reached after 1 e4 a6 2 d4 b5 3 Nf3 Bb7 4 Bd3 Nf6 5 Nbd2!? c5 6 c3 e6 7 0-0 (which can also be reached via 2 …e6 3 Nf3 b5 4 Bd3 Bb7 5 0-0 c5 6 c3 Nf6 7 Nbd2!? or 1 d4 b5!? 2 e4 Bb7 3 Nd2!? a6 4 Ngf3 e6 5 Bd3 c5 6 c3 Nf6 7 0-0). Jonathan Tisdall on ChessPub now suggests 7 …Nc6, 7 …cd or 7 …d5 (7 …Be7?! 8 Re1 Nc6 9 e5!), but Black’s results here have been poor. What might be the attractions of this line for Black? I notice Csom (and Spassky) have tried …d6 plans here (both before and after …Nf6/…c5) and wonder if this is an interesting approach – the same set-up is obviously possible in the Owen’s, and while presumably White is slightly better in both cases maybe the edge isn’t serious?

Two final queries: should Black be worried about 1 e4 a6 2 d4 b5 3 Nf3 Bb7 4 e5!? (4 …e6 5 Bd3 c5) or 1 d4 b5 2 e4 Bb7 3 Bb5!? Be4 4 Nf3?
[/quote]
Basman wrote two books about the Saint-George. One of them (the oldest) is [color=#339999][b][i]Play the St. George[/i][/b][/color] and was edited by Pergamon Press in 1983. Did you read it?
Basman did not found the Gambit so bad at all.
For the main line Basman recommended playing 7...Qb6 where 8. a4 is critical. He did not like 7...-Nc6 because of 8.d5 but thought that[b] 7...-Be7[/b] preparing Nc6 or [b]7...h6[/b] preventing white light square bishop to go to Bg5, were both playable.
  

Yusupov once said that “The problem with the Dutch Defence is that later in many positions the best move would be ...f5-f7” but he is surely wrong.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1977
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: St George theory and praxis
Reply #2 - 12/12/06 at 10:34:55
Post Tools
Good to hear from you, SutterCane! -- and all the best to you too for Christmas and '07.

I feel like you that the St George can't really hold a candle to the Owen's for depth of ideas and interesting play. Still as you say it's something Owen's fans should know about. I'm interested in particular in the question of whether, in the main line I gave, Black would rather have played ...b6 or ...b5 if he should go in for ...d6/...Nbd7 plans. But what, without giving away your preparation if you don't want to, do you think is Black's strongest set-up in the main line with Nd2/c3? I haven't got Basman's ancient book so I don't know what he says. Are there any key games you'd recommend?

As for the gambit line, yes, Dammer--Juegel is a great game. On 7 Qe2 f5 8 Nh3 I assume 8 ...Be4 is correct as played by Basman. But what's the verdict on e.g. 7 f3 Qh5 8 Kf1 Ne7 9 Ne2? Mess?

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SutterCane
Full Member
***
Offline


I recognize terror in
chess as the finest emotion!

Posts: 122
Location: Germany
Joined: 01/04/03
Gender: Male
Re: St George theory and praxis
Reply #1 - 12/12/06 at 07:03:22
Post Tools
Hello Michael,

the St.Georg !?

Hmm,...I played this stuff exclusively with black & white...many years!
The problem with the St.Georg is that with black you will find out, that with the best lines versus good players it is very hard to win. I practiced this stuff on ICCF masterclass level versus 2400 and better players with great success...draw! So let me say: the St.Georg is absolutely OK when you know the best lines...to hold the Basman book in your hands is not enough. As i said, the result of your study will be, that most time you have to be very creative to earn a draw. This is why i switched to the OWEN, here you mostly reach the key positions. And in combination with the ENGLISH DEFENCE the OWEN suits better...

Yes, the Basman Gambit ...b5 Bb5 Bb7...is nice, I guess here in our database is a very nice game!!!

Finally: it is not fun to work hard versus a player who is 200 ELO weaker to reach a DRAW with the St.George, but to learn the lines of the St.George is not a bad thing for an OWEN fan.

Michael, best wishes for X-mas and a GUTEN RUTSCH INS NEUE JAHR 2007  Cool

SutterCane
  

I recognize terror as the finest emotion in a chessgame and so I will try to terrorize my opponent. But if I find that I cannot terrify, I will try to horrify, and if I find that I cannot horrify ...
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1977
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
St George theory and praxis
12/12/06 at 01:47:09
Post Tools
There are not too many Forum threads on the St George so I thought I’d open a new one. I’ve been having a look at some of the critical(?) lines and would be interested to hear people’s views.

One key question, I guess, is whether one should see the point of the defence as being to reach ‘Basman Gambit’ positions, or whether other lines are just as reasonable for Black. The Gambit is typically (usually?) reached via 1 e4 a6 2 d4 e6!? 3 c4 b5 4 cb ab 5 Bb5 Bb7. Does anybody know what best play is meant to be here and what the current assessment is? As a related question, after 1 e4 a6 2 d4 b5!? 3 c4 (or 1 d4 a6 2 c4 b5 3 e4), is 3 …Bb7 inferior, or not?

My second question concerns the main-line position reached after 1 e4 a6 2 d4 b5 3 Nf3 Bb7 4 Bd3 Nf6 5 Nbd2!? c5 6 c3 e6 7 0-0 (which can also be reached via 2 …e6 3 Nf3 b5 4 Bd3 Bb7 5 0-0 c5 6 c3 Nf6 7 Nbd2!? or 1 d4 b5!? 2 e4 Bb7 3 Nd2!? a6 4 Ngf3 e6 5 Bd3 c5 6 c3 Nf6 7 0-0). Jonathan Tisdall on ChessPub now suggests 7 …Nc6, 7 …cd or 7 …d5 (7 …Be7?! 8 Re1 Nc6 9 e5!), but Black’s results here have been poor. What might be the attractions of this line for Black? I notice Csom (and Spassky) have tried …d6 plans here (both before and after …Nf6/…c5) and wonder if this is an interesting approach – the same set-up is obviously possible in the Owen’s, and while presumably White is slightly better in both cases maybe the edge isn’t serious?

Two final queries: should Black be worried about 1 e4 a6 2 d4 b5 3 Nf3 Bb7 4 e5!? (4 …e6 5 Bd3 c5) or 1 d4 b5 2 e4 Bb7 3 Bb5!? Be4 4 Nf3?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo