I think Kindermann's ...d5 idea is ok. The position is playable but I'll admit black's probably a little bit worse.
Further to my previous point: from all my sources I know of 7 games (Kindermann's one doesn't seem to be on the bases) that have reached the position after 14.c5 and 2 that featured 14...d5. So if you are unlikely enough to meet someone who does actually know this and playes down it bear the following in mind:
1) They are very well prepared in a relatively unusual defence. Be glad you didn't play the KID
2) Someone that well prepared is likely to be a very decent player.
3) They are unlikely to know of ...d5 unless they have Kindermann's english edition (or read here and have taken note)
4) You'll automatically become one of the leading experts on this key position in the Leningrad because so few people have actually played it
5) For all white's prep he's only managed to reach a relatively unclear and obscure position where you may be ahead in analysis.
So I don't think it's something to worry about if you happy with the rest.
Also I realised I didn't quite answer your questions properly: but I think both 8...a5 and 8...Na6 are about the same - 8...a5 is safer and you are less likely to be blown away but I also think that white is under less pressure and can get a reasonable game by making sensible moves. 8...Na6 puts him under more pressure.
But if you don't have much study time I'd suggest looking closer at 7...c6 since white's choices are more restricted. 8.d5 e5 (or you can try to transpose to 7...Qe8 8.d5 Na6) leads to positions where understanding is more important, 8.b3 is probably the most natural if you've never looked at the position before but 8...Qa5 is just very nice for black and I don't think the others really challenge (8.Re1 Nh5!? seems ok).
I've only had the position after 7...Qe8 twice OTB and both opponents played 8.Re1