|
I know this variation as the Anderssen variation. or the Anderssen-Smyslov variation. One of the better replies (and the one I favour personally) is 5.....Bc5. This reply appeared first in two games Anderssen-Morphy (2nd and 4th match game, 1858 ). In more modern times it has appeared in the games of the 1...e5 specialist Ivan Sokolov, Emms and in the games of Pomariov. The position after 6.0-0 is mostly recorderd under ECO78 as it transposes from 5.0-0, Bc5 6.d3 In this position 6...0-0 doesnt give black much compensation for the pawn sack. Black should reply either I.6....b5 7.Bb3,d6 (Emms) or II..6....d6 (Sokolov, Timman) These variations differ slightly where the response to the move Be3 is concerned, ..d6 the more flexibel response. Note that ommitting the move b5 may give the game a more italian character. I. 5.d3,Bc5 6.0-0, b5 7.Bb3, d6 8.Be3, 0-0 as Bxc5 is hardly a positional threat. II. 5.d3,Bc5 6.0-0, d6 7.Be3, Bxe3 seem OK as well (while a transposition to var. I with 7...b5 is still possible). 5.d3,d6 leads to positions that may be considered as belonging to the Deferred Steinitz defence. As for 5.d3, d6 the following games are worth looking into: 5.d3, d6 6.c3,g6 7.0-0, Bg7 Smyslov-Euwe, Groningen 1946 (8.Re1,b5) Boleslavsky-Smyslov!, USSR, 1947 (8.Re1,0-0 9.Nbd2,Na5) Cholmov-Korchnoi, USSR-team, 1962 (8.Re1,0-0 9.Nbd2,Nd7) Stein-Korchnoi, USSR, 1964 (8.d4?!,0-0 9.d5,Ne7) 5.d3, d6 6.c3,g6 7.Nbd2,Bg7 8.Nf1!?, 0-0 Smyslov-Boleslavsky, USSR, 1943 5.d3,d6 6.c3, Be7!? 7.0-0,0-0 8.Nbd2,Nd7! Smyslov-Geller, USSR, 1960 Bronstein-Geller, USSR, 1963 5.d3,d6 6.c3, Be7 7.Nbd2, 0-0 8.Nf1!?,b5 9.Bb3 Fischer-Smyslov, Havanna, 1965
|