diagram II http://www.france-echecs.com/diagramme/imgboard.phpfen=5Q2/7p/7P/1k2K3/8/8/8/2q5... @Dink Heckler,
Thx for your contribution!
Yes, your suggestion
6.Kf6! is a much better move than the
continuations I gave to illuminate the draw. It sets black a more difficult task because
(a) Now black cant draw by exchanging queens as he's one tempo short;
(b) Black cant bring his King nearer as he cant cross the c-file as yet (7....Kc6 drops the queen after 8.Qc8+). However I still consider the position as drawn, as I dont think it's so simple for white to pick up the black h-pawn.
White's best plan to win the h-pawn is to approach the pawn with his King. This assumes he will put his
king at either g7 or h8. So:
6.Kf6,Qc6+! 7.Kg7, I dont think the alternatives very meaningfull
7.Kg5,Qg6+ or 7.Kf7,Qg6+ and white doenst make any progress.
7......, Qg6+ 8.Kh8 Now white is just two steps away from winning the h-pawn
But I am afraid this is not enough
8......, Kc6! Black has bound white's queen to the defence of h6
and plans to play Kd7-e7. Once blacks king reaches e7 the position is a dead
draw as the defence .....,Qf7 becomes feasible and winning the h-pawn isnt enough.
diagram IIa http://www.france-echecs.com/diagramme/imgboard.phpfen=5Q1K/7p/2k3qP/8/8/8/8/8w-... 5Q1K/7p/2k3qP/8/8/8/8/8 w - -
One tiny detail:
From diagram IIa the attempt to drive black's queen off with 9.Qg7 fails to 9....Qf5:
9.Qg7,Qf5 10.Qxh7,Qf8+ 11.Qg8,Qxh6 picks up white's h-pawn. P.M. I've avoided to resort to checking the more difficult positions where black gives up the pawn,
to reach a theoretical drawn but practical extremely hard to defend position.
First of all, they are extremely hard to analyze, given all the possible winning attempts.
Secondly I think it's important to considers these endgames without resorting to databases or
tablebases if possible, as the results are often hard to apply to practical play.
Still if my memory is any good the h-pawn has a reasonable large drawing zone in the top left corner,
should disaster befall black (my source for this is John Nunn, Secrets of practical chess).
By the way, against a far advanced f-pawn Nunn states the drawing zone is indeed very small,
so there was every reason to look for a continuation in plan C that didnt end up in this kind of endgame.
[edit: move numbers corrected]