Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ? (Read 40708 times)
Antillian
God Member
*****
Offline


Brilliance without dazzle!

Posts: 1757
Joined: 01/05/03
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #10 - 01/04/08 at 23:39:49
Post Tools
drkodos wrote on 01/03/08 at 04:56:16:
ErictheRed wrote on 09/19/07 at 03:58:03:
I've personally always thought that the best reply to 3.Nc3 is 3...dxc4.  At least, I think it's a good way to play, and easier for Black than 3...e5.



Agreed, as from the White side I like to play 3. Nc3 and have found this line to be pesky, almost to the point of chasing me to Nf3.  But, and like JLo's its a big one, after finding the proper play (outlined above by Lee Roth) I think this move is inferior to other lines in the Slav complex.   



I don't quite follow you. What move is inferior? Are you refering to 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nc3 dc or to 1. d4 d5 2. c4 c6 3. Nf3 dc ?
  

"Breakthrough results come about by a series of good decisions, diligently executed and accumulated one on top of another." Jim Collins --- Good to Great
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
drkodos
God Member
*****
Offline


I see....stars.

Posts: 778
Location: Jupiter, and beyond
Joined: 03/29/07
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #9 - 01/03/08 at 04:56:16
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 09/19/07 at 03:58:03:
I've personally always thought that the best reply to 3.Nc3 is 3...dxc4.  At least, I think it's a good way to play, and easier for Black than 3...e5.



Agreed, as from the White side I like to play 3. Nc3 and have found this line to be pesky, almost to the point of chasing me to Nf3.  But, and like JLo's its a big one, after finding the proper play (outlined above by Lee Roth) I think this move is inferior to other lines in the Slav complex.  

I've got this book on order Smiley, am hoping it does have some interesting stuff along this pathway, but firmly (with no evidence) believe it's going to concentrate on systems where Black plays 2.e6 and may include "Traingle" suggestions.

Latest word is due out in the States in early Feb.  Smiley
  

I know I've made some very poor decisions recently, but I can give you my complete assurance that my work will be back to normal. I've still got the greatest enthusiasm and confidence in the mission.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
HgMan
God Member
*****
Offline


Demand me nothing: What
you know, you know

Posts: 2330
Location: Up on Cripple Creek
Joined: 11/09/04
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #8 - 01/02/08 at 23:45:37
Post Tools
Any news on this book?
  

"Luck favours the prepared mind."  --Louis Pasteur
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ghenghisclown
God Member
*****
Offline


Pedicare Vestri Latin

Posts: 1022
Location: HollyWeird
Joined: 07/19/06
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #7 - 09/19/07 at 11:31:44
Post Tools
Huh Just wonder if D.W.: The Queen's Gambit will cover some slav offshoots. 

Anybody out there know?
  

"Experience is a dim lamp, which only lights the one who bears it."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #6 - 09/19/07 at 03:58:03
Post Tools
I've personally always thought that the best reply to 3.Nc3 is 3...dxc4.  At least, I think it's a good way to play, and easier for Black than 3...e5.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10777
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #5 - 09/17/07 at 22:47:45
Post Tools
As 3.Nf3 rules out the Marshall Gambit anyway, you might contemplate this repertoire: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6
a) 3.Nc3 e5
b) 3.Nf3 e6 evt. 4.Nc3 dxc4.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
LeeRoth
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 1520
Joined: 10/22/05
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #4 - 09/17/07 at 18:12:34
Post Tools
ghenghisclown wrote on 09/16/07 at 22:34:16:
A much better question, probably the most interesting one, is can Black transpose into a Noteboom (or something like it) if White isn't careful.

I suppose that would go  1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 dxc4 4.a4 e6 5.e3/e4 b5 6.axb5 cxb5 7.Nc3 Bb4


Am I missing some great move for White or some concept that  makes this a bad idea? 

It seems to me that if this works it's better than having to deal with the painful Marshall gambit in the regular move order (I agree with Vigorito, better to deal with the exchange Slav than that). This also seems to avoid the Catalan. What am I missing?





Very creative idea. But, as you suspect, there is nothing new under the sun these days. The idea of 3..dxc4 is known.  Play typically continues as you've outlined, but White blocks the check with the bishop, rather than the knight.  For example, 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 dc4 4.e3 b5 5.a4 e6 6.axb5 cxb5 7.b3 Bb4+ 8.Bd2 Bxd2+ 9.Nbd2 a5 10.bxc4 b4 11.Ne5 which is thought to favor White.   

 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ghenghisclown
God Member
*****
Offline


Pedicare Vestri Latin

Posts: 1022
Location: HollyWeird
Joined: 07/19/06
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #3 - 09/16/07 at 22:34:16
Post Tools
A much better question, probably the most interesting one, is can Black transpose into a Noteboom (or something like it) if White isn't careful.

I suppose that would go  1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 dxc4 4.a4 e6 5.e3/e4 b5 6.axb5 cxb5 7.Nc3 Bb4


Am I missing some great move for White or some concept that  makes this a bad idea? 

It seems to me that if this works it's better than having to deal with the painful Marshall gambit in the regular move order (I agree with Vigorito, better to deal with the exchange Slav than that). This also seems to avoid the Catalan. What am I missing?


  

"Experience is a dim lamp, which only lights the one who bears it."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10777
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #2 - 09/16/07 at 20:31:12
Post Tools
I admit it is a while ago, but Dutch IM Mark van der Werf en Dutch FM Teun van der Vorm have written a book on the Noteboom/Abrahams/Triangle or whatever you call it. The book is from 1996, the publisher is Cadogan and it treats everything but not necessarily exhaustive after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 and 3...c6.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nyoke
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 593
Location: BELGIUM
Joined: 12/31/06
Gender: Male
Re: Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
Reply #1 - 09/16/07 at 19:36:53
Post Tools
And will this Triangle/Wedge thing everybody seems to know but on which no literature is available be treated ?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ghenghisclown
God Member
*****
Offline


Pedicare Vestri Latin

Posts: 1022
Location: HollyWeird
Joined: 07/19/06
Gender: Male
Dangerous Weapons: The Queens Gambit - ?
09/15/07 at 23:41:09
Post Tools
Does anybody know if the Queen's Gambit edition of the Dangerous Weapons series will include the Slav? I'm pretty sure there'll be lines in there without 2...e6, but I wonder if there'll be variations of the Slav since that seems to be the area with the right mix of solidity and tricky play.
  

"Experience is a dim lamp, which only lights the one who bears it."
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo