Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!? (Read 37414 times)
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #35 - 04/13/10 at 23:02:59
Post Tools
@ TN,

I was meaning to come back to you long ago re your Reply #26 above, but never got round to it!

First, re your 7 Bd3! suggestion after 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5 3 d5 Nce7 4 Nf3 Ng6 5 h4 h5 6 Bg5 Nf6. Here after 7 ...Bc5 8 0-0, I think 8 ...0-0 is just a mistake and that 8 ...d6! is much better, even if ...0-0 follows later. I don't immediately see White's advantage here, in view of his weaknesses on the kingside. If he plays 9 c4, then 9 ...Bg4 and 10 ...Qd7, retaining the option of ...0-0-0, and with various potentially nasty kingside threats (e.g. ...Bxf3/...Nh7). If 9 Nc3, then 9 ...a6 and 10 ...Qd7, with analogous ideas.

3 dxe5 is traditionally viewed as a bigger threat to the Nimzo and instinctively I feel more concerned about these lines than the 3 d5 ones. After 3 ...Ne5 4 Nf3 Bb4 5 c3 Nf3 6 Qf3 Bc5, Plaskett's 7 Nd2!? is very interesting, but is it clearly good for White? Now 7 ...Ne7 looks playable and highly thematic but 7 ...Nf6!? is interesting too. Then what I wonder? After 8 e5 Qe7 (or 8 b4 Bb6 9 a4 a5!) Black seems to have sufficient resources so maybe 8 Nb3 Bb6 9 Bg5? But still after 9 ...h6 10 Bh4 d6 (or 9 ...d6 immediately) there is a lot of murk, or so it seems to me! I'm sure White can get some advantage by taking on f6, but I'm tempted to think it's not a serious one (even if some engines disagree).

Any thoughts (anyone)? The Nimzo seems always to slither out of trouble! ...
« Last Edit: 04/14/10 at 00:07:34 by Michael Ayton »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Nimzowitsch Defence 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5
Reply #34 - 10/12/09 at 06:33:50
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 10/12/09 at 05:23:33:
Well, I know a guy who does not have the courage to go into my Zilbermints Gambit, 1 d4 e5 2 dxe5 Nc6 3 Nf3 Nge7. Instead, he avoids all the fun by playing 3 e4, which transposes to the Nimzovich Defense.

By the way, this guy is a National Master rated 2247. He once told me that he wants to avoid playing lines he is not familiar with. How is that?

Geez... One would think that a National Master would have some pluck and courage. Keep in mind I am rated lower than him by about 200 points. Well, I still beat him the last time we played!

1 d4 e5 2 dxe5 Nc6 3 e4 d6 4 exd6 Bxd6 and the game went from there. 

The opening is the Charlick-Hartlaub Gambit.


And what if White plays 4.Nf3? 4...Bg4 5.Bb5 Qe7 6.0-0 isn't much fun for Black, and neither is 4...Qe7 5.ed6 (5.Nc3 Ne5 6.Nd5 is even better) 5...Qe4 6.Qe2 Qe2 7.Be2 Bd6 8.Nc3 a6 9.Be3. Not that the 3...d6 gambit is sound, but if White can obtain a slight and pleasant advantage by simply declining the gambit then it doesn't inspire any confidence in the idea.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #33 - 10/12/09 at 05:23:33
Post Tools
Well, I know a guy who does not have the courage to go into my Zilbermints Gambit, 1 d4 e5 2 dxe5 Nc6 3 Nf3 Nge7. Instead, he avoids all the fun by playing 3 e4, which transposes to the Nimzovich Defense.

By the way, this guy is a National Master rated 2247. He once told me that he wants to avoid playing lines he is not familiar with. How is that?

Geez... One would think that a National Master would have some pluck and courage. Keep in mind I am rated lower than him by about 200 points. Well, I still beat him the last time we played!

1 d4 e5 2 dxe5 Nc6 3 e4 d6 4 exd6 Bxd6 and the game went from there. 

The opening is the Charlick-Hartlaub Gambit.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Straggler
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 382
Joined: 08/09/09
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #32 - 08/29/09 at 20:55:05
Post Tools
I remember being rather excited a few years ago to find Keene and Jacobs' "A Complete Defence for Black", in which 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5 forms part of the recommended repertoire. (Absurdly, they also give some games with Nimzowitsch's 2...d5 -- including, oddly enough, no fewer than four of Keene's own -- even though they don't recommend it because of 3.Nc3!) 

But disillusionment set in when I realised that this line allows White to transpose into the Scotch with 3.Nf3. If I wanted to defend the Scotch, I'd be playing 1...e5 in the first place. I realise of course that stronger players would rather defend the Scotch than the Lopez; but I'm not one of those. I hate defending the Scotch. 

However, I've been thinking about this again. It is often said here, and no doubt rightly, that patzers like me ought to be playing 1...e5. The snag about that, as others have pointed out, is that you need to learn a lot of theory before you can confidently play 1...e5 in a serious game. 

I wonder whether one solution to this would be to use 1...Nc6 as a way of dipping one's toe into the shark-infested 1...e5 water. One could take it in three stages:

A. Learn 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5 (including the Scotch) but answer 2.Nf3 with 2...d6.

B. Learn defences to the Lopez, Giuoco Piano etc, and phase out 1.e4 Nc6 2.Nf3 d6 in favour of 2...e5.

C. Learn defences to the King's Gambit, Centre Game etc, and phase out 1...Nc6 in favour of 1...e5.

Does that seem a reasonable plan? Of course, one might find that one does as well with the 1...Nc6 lines as Miles did -- which would mean a lot more time to study tactics and endgames!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #31 - 07/10/09 at 23:07:44
Post Tools
Hi Flig and ta for this -- very interesting! A Nimzo via a Modern -- I like it!

Fishing around for my notes on this stuff I find ... I don't have any! Cheesy  All I had, I now remember, was a few scribbled notes to Campora--Miles, suggesting inter alia that if Campora had prefaced 24 Bd3 with 24 cxb5 he'd have been better. But whatever the truth about this game I agree Kristiansen's approach looks good. White's Kc1--b1 and Rd1--c1 looks slow to me but in any case it doeesn't seem as though White can 'cause trouble' very easily.  The Nimzo gets away again!

Not sure what to recommend as a low-maintenance counter to the Nimzo. Possibly 2 Nf3! -- especially when you don't know whether Black will meet 2 d4 with 2 ...e5 or 2 ...d5. But after 2 ...g6! (a Modern via a Nimzo!), as recommended by linksspringer in another thread, White had better be prepared!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #30 - 07/06/09 at 20:26:48
Post Tools
In Campora-Miles after the moves 4... f5!? 5.f3 Nf6 6.Nc3 d6 7.Qd2 g6 8.0-0-0 Bg7 9.h3 I am not sure if closing the kingside with 9... f4 was the best decision. Interestingly the same position has been reached via a completely different moveorder (1.e4 g6) in the game Sahl-Kristiansen, Den-ch 1995 where Black just played 9... 0-0 ignoring whites g4-idea and trying to get counterplay with Bd7, Qb8 and b5 which seemed to work well.

I have looked into other setups for White but couldn´t find anything really convincing. Perhaps trying to reach an "ideal" King´s Indian for White with 4... f5 5.f3 Nf6 6.Nd2 d6 7.c4 g6 8.Ne2 Bg7 9.Nc3 0-0 10.Be2 is an idea. But of course Black doesn´t have to follow that path ...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #29 - 07/06/09 at 13:49:51
Post Tools
Hi Flig,

Stubbornness is good.  Wink Or can be.

The answer to 4 Be3 is often given as 4 ...f5 following Campora--Miles, but I remember looking at this and thinking White was actually doing well. On 4 ...Ng6, 5 f3!? is also meant to be interesting? I'll take a further look at this later on when I've dug out my notes. Meanwhile I'm hoping TN will chip in again -- his analytical suggestions I always find of interest.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #28 - 07/04/09 at 14:46:46
Post Tools
@ Michael

I believe I have seen the Be3 & Nd2 idea in some book stating black has difficulties with his Bf8. But perhaps my memory failed me here since your excellent suggestion of Qe7 & Bc5 solves this problem.

What if White delays c4 and continues with 3.d5 Nce7 4.Be3 Ng6 5.Nd2 ? After 5... Nf6  6.f3 Bb4 7.a3 Bxd2+ (Ba5 7.c4) 8.Qxd2 seems forced. Or if 6... c6 6.c4 Bb4 again 7.a3. Practical experience here is very limited.

Perhaps I overestimate the bishop pair here but I would like to make such a setup work for White because it´s simple and easy to remember for the rare occasion I meet a player who uses the Nimzovich. So please forgive my stubbornness here.  Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #27 - 07/04/09 at 10:55:04
Post Tools
Thanks for some good and concrete suggestions. I'd forgotten all about that standard d5-d6 idea (Ivanov-Minasian) (and I think I got the Hoi and Miles games the wrong way round earlier).

In (2), how about 6 ...Nf6 7 Bd3 and now 7 ...Be7? (I also wondered about 6 ...Bb4, which might not be so daft though it looks rather unreliable!)

In (3), I hadn't seen that particular Plaskett idea. Maybe Miles would be looking to development and piece co-ordination to counter White's probable coming possession of the two Blips so what about 7 ...Ne7 or 7 ...Nf6? (I see the only other game here on ChessLive went 7 ...Bb6 8 Nc4 Ne7 draw agreed Grin) The latter runs into a pin of course but maybe Black can arrange ...h6 + ...g5? As you can tell, these are just quick thoughts!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #26 - 07/04/09 at 00:12:28
Post Tools
[quote author=nmga link=1209888813/15#21 date=1246357035]TN, in another thread, mentions three White possibilities:

(1) 3 d5 Nce7 4 c4.  This is what, as a Nimzo player, I like to see most! After 4 ...Ng6 then ...Nf6 we're probably in less critical Tango territory and I think Black is fine. [b]I agree that Black should be okay here; ECO claims a slight edge for White but I find this hard to believe. Perhaps instead of 5.Nc3/5.Be3, White should prefer 5.g3!? Bc5 6.h4! when at least White has some dynamic potential in his position with h5 on the cards.[/b]

(2) 3 d5 Nce7 4 Nf3 Ng6 5 h4 h5 6 Bg5. This is surely critical! There aren't too many practical examples, but to set discussion rolling what on 6 ...Nf6 (6 ...Be7!?) 7 Nc3 Bb4? Now Mortensen-Hoi went 8 Qd3 a6! and Simons-Miles 8 Nd2 c6! but I'm sure there are other White tries. [b]Firstly, the immediate 6...Be7 is dubious because of 7.d6! cd6 8.Nc3 Nf6 9.Bf6 Bf6 10.Qd6 when White has a significant advantage. Secondly, 7.Bd3!? (far less common than 7.Nc3) may well be more precise, to prevent Black from playing ...Bb4 without losing a tempo. Play continues 7...Bc5 8.0-0 0-0 (not forced but Black will have to do this someday) and now White is slightly better after 9.c4 d6 10.Nc3. Black does not have his usual counterplay on the kingside, and it is difficult for him to attack on the queenside because of White's space advantage in this sector.[/b]

(3) 3 de Ne5 4 Nf3. Here I prefer 4 ...Bb4 -- see Reply 2 above. Last time I looked I thought Black was OK here but ... let discussion roll! [b]After 6...Bc5, I think White should play 7.Nd2!?: for example, Plaskett-Sammour Hasbun, Mermaid Beach 1998, continued Qf6 8. Nc4 d6 9. b4 Bb6 10. a4 c5 11. Bf4 Bg4 12. Nxd6+ Qxd6 13. Bb5+, and Black resigned. Black should prefer 8...Qf3 9.gf3 d6, although White an advatnage with 10.Be3 or the intermezzo 10.Rg1. 10.b4!? isn't bad either.



[/b]
[/quote]
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #25 - 07/03/09 at 23:03:23
Post Tools
[quote]After 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5 3.d5 Ne7 4.c4 Ng6 5.Be3 the square c5 ist covered an after 5... Bb4+ 6.Nd2 Black probably has to give up the bishop-pair without any compensating factor [/quote]

But Black usually plays 6 ...Nf6, meeting 7 f3 with 7 ...Qe7 then ...Bc5 swapping Bishops. Also the more passive Nd2 weakens White's influence on d6 so that ...c6 is a typical manoeuvre for Black. In games like Shirazi-Miles White didn't succeed in proving anything.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #24 - 07/02/09 at 16:57:06
Post Tools
I have tried the Tango in a few games in the last 2 years. In my experience in this structure Black wants to place the bishop on c5 or exchange it on c3 giving White doubled pawns.

Via the moveorder 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 Nc6 3.Nc3 e5 4.d5 Ne7 5.e4 Ng6 6.Bd3 allows 6... Bc5! and 6.Be3 allows 6... Bb4! 7.f3 Bxc3+.

After 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 e5 3.d5 Ne7 4.c4 Ng6 5.Be3 the square c5 ist covered an after 5... Bb4+ 6.Nd2 Black probably has to give up the bishop-pair without any compensating factor though one may argue that at least he has exchanged his bad bishop in a closed position. Still I believe the bishop-pair offers White good longterm chances to provide an edge.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #23 - 07/01/09 at 23:49:01
Post Tools
Sure, in (1) Black cannot actually force a Tango. I've never seriously studied 5 Be3 and had just assumed that Nd2 wasn't stronger than Nc3 -- rather lazily I admit, but then games by Miles, Speelman et al. seem to suggest decent counterplay for Black. But theory here is in its infancy and there must be a lot of room for independent research!

As for 4 c4 Nf6 5 Bd3 Ng6 then 6 Be3 or 6 Ne2, I have never looked at these at all! Not a great many practical examples here. But is there any objective reason to suppose that any of these lines offer White better chances of an advantage than the comparable lines with Nc3?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #22 - 06/30/09 at 14:41:15
Post Tools
In (1) after 4.c4 Ng6 white doesn´t have to transpose to the Tango with Nc3. An independant idea is 5.Be3!? intending 5... Bb4+ 6.Nd2! which may be a little better for white. 

4.c4 Nf6 5.Bd3 Ng6 6.Be3 or 6.Ne2 is also independent from a normal Tango.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Michael Ayton
God Member
*****
Offline


‘You’re never alone with
a doppelgänger.’

Posts: 1975
Location: durham
Joined: 04/19/03
Gender: Male
Re: "Nimzowitsch" Defence 1 e4 Nc6 2 d4 e5!?
Reply #21 - 06/30/09 at 10:17:15
Post Tools
TN, in another thread, mentions three White possibilities:

(1) 3 d5 Nce7 4 c4.  This is what, as a Nimzo player, I like to see most! After 4 ...Ng6 then ...Nf6 we're probably in less critical Tango territory and I think Black is fine.

(2) 3 d5 Nce7 4 Nf3 Ng6 5 h4 h5 6 Bg5. This is surely critical! There aren't too many practical examples, but to set discussion rolling what on 6 ...Nf6 (6 ...Be7!?) 7 Nc3 Bb4? Now Mortensen-Hoi went 8 Qd3 a6! and Simons-Miles 8 Nd2 c6! but I'm sure there are other White tries.

(3) 3 de Ne5 4 Nf3. Here I prefer 4 ...Bb4 -- see Reply 2 above. Last time I looked I thought Black was OK here but ... let discussion roll!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo