|
Hello, here is one of private message I sent to forum member (I deleted his pseudo) about opposite castling in KIA. I played some games vs KIA with various systems, including Watson Bd6-Nge7 given in Play The French (1 o 2 ?) and looked after Bc5, but now I prefer going now for "near-closed" system with b6. Please don't judge too hard my comments (it's only my point of view): --------- I don't mind to share my games (and my comments)...it's because I am a fan of French defence... A recent game with KIA-opposite wings castle: Lallemant-Laurain D March 2008 2083 - 2035 L'iSle/Sorgue-Tournefeuille French league N2 1.e4 e6 2.d3 d5 3.Nd2 Nf6 4.Ngf3 c5 5.g3 b6 { First choice: I prefer this slow system with play for Black in the center and in an possible kingside pawn attack. Of course, other plan is possible and for some players, play with b5 and piece play on the queenside is better...and I have played before such plan you can view in Dvorestky book Opening Preparation and Uhlmann book about French } 6.Bg2 Bb7 { Some unprepared White players think e4-pawn can be taken next move. Wrong! } 7.e5?! { Common mistake. Many White players and book readers have read than e5 push is premature but don't know why... and the answer can only be known with the g5-plan for Black, and repeating the threat to take e5 pawn. 7.oo is the good move and Black cannot grab the e4 pawn because of Ng5 } Nfd7 8.oo Qc7 { 8...Nc6 is more precise but difficult to show it in few words...I try: because of g5 pawn can be played one move earlier than in main game: 8...Nc6 9.Re1 Be7 10.Qe2 g5. In fact it doesn't matter IF AND ONLY IF White doesn't know the good plan of playing c4 at some stage } 9.Re1 Nc6 10.Qe2 { Missing the opportunity to play 10.c4! but White must be prepared to play on the queenside } Be7 11.c3 { game is at crossroads...White must take g5 seriously } g5! { With c3 a slow but many purposes move, White want do play in the center to achieve a c3-d4-e5 solid pawn structure and sometimes a pawn attack on queenside with a3-b4. Problem: g5 threating e5 in one move. Reference game: Nazarov-Yanderimov,URSS 1991 } 12.g4 { To prevent g4 fr Black winning e5 pawn 12.h3 h5 13.g4 same plan for Black } h5 { or 12..ooo with h5 to follow. Same plan } 13.h3 hxg4 14.hxg4 ooo { Important to note the position now on kingside: serious pawns weaknesses with f2-g4 pawns not connected; h file for Black. In other lines, where White deviates early and plan Nf1 before, it's not the same because White wins the g4 square for a knight. Here not the case: only h5 square is available for a knight } 15.Nf1 Ndg8 16.Ng3 Kb8 { At that time over the board, I was thinking about the exchange sacrifice 16...Rh4!?, I have looked at when working on the KIA,...,but with few memories I preferred playing safely a good move } 17.Bd2 Qd8! { I found good plan over the board and the plan is part of my answer about strategy for Black in the KIA. Idea is of course: Qf8-Qh6 } 18.a3 { Logical. White prepares the pawn advance b4 } Qf8 19.b4 Qh6 20.d4 c4 21.a4 Qg6 22.Nh2 Rh4 23.Nh5 { White managed to block the h file, but in the assessment of position Black is already better } Rh8 24.Bf3 Bd8 25.Nf1 Bc7 { the long placement of the bishop is preparation of opening center and diagonale with f6 for Black } 26.Qd1 Nd8 27.Qc1 f5 28.exf6 Nxf6 29.Qd1 Nxh5 30.gxh5 Qf5 31.Bg2 g4 32.Qb1 Qxh5 { At this point you can compare the attack for White on queenside and Black attack on kingside ...but now my level of play is lower near zeitnot} 33.Ng3 Bxg3 34.fxg3 Rh1+ 35.Kf2 Rh2 36.Bf4+ Ka8 37.Rh1 Qf7 38.Rxh2 Rxh2 39.Qg1 Qh7 40.Qxh2! {excellent defence } Qxh2 41.Rh1 Qxh1 42.Bxh1 Bc6 43.b5 Be8 44.Ke3 Bg6 45.Bc7 Nf7 46.Kf4 Bc2 last mistake 46...Kb7...and White wins 20 moves later Alternatives for White: A) 11.h4 h6 { Reference game: Benko-Seirawan,Lone Pine 1977 } 12.h5 ooo 13.a3 Rdg8 14.c4 d4 15.b4! { game: Norwood-Marsh } g5 16.b5 Na5 17.Nh2 Bxg2 18.Kxg2 Qb7+ 19.Kg1 g4 20.Nxg4 Rg5 21.f4 Rg7 unclear or 12.Nf1 ooo { Reference game: Bobekov-Vankov,1977 and analyzed on Neven CD about French } and for example: 13.N1h2 Rdg8 and if 14.c3 {Reference: Filipovic-Cebalo,NoviSad 1985 } then 14...g5! or 14...Nf8!? or 12.c3 g5 { leads to same plan than in my game } B) 11.c4 Nb4! { the problem with a late c4 . Reference: Yap-Smagin,Moscow 1986 } C) 11.c3 g5! { see my game } D) 11.Nf1 ooo { better than 11..h6 losing time as in my game Favarel-Laurain D,French League N2 january 2008 } 12.h4 { Reference: Polzielny-Lobron,Dortmund 1980 ; 12.c3 Rdg8!} h6 { see A) } E) 11.a3 { Reference: Eymann-Beckmann,Allemagne 1997 } g5 12.h3 h5 13.g4 hxg4 14.hxg4 ooo 15.Nf1 Rdg8 16.c3 { position I played in game: Iglesias-Laurain D,Nancy 2003 where I played the bad plan 16...Nf8?! } Qd8! 17.b4 Qf8 18.Bd2 Qh6 transposes in my game F) 11.Nb3h6 12.c3 g5 13.h3 a5 14.a4 Rg8 or 14...Ba6 If White plays the good plan (not pushing e5 too early then Black must delay moves like Nc6 or Qc7 because e5 target doesnt exist): 7.oo!? Be7! { 7...Qc7 8.Re1 Nc6 9.e5 Nfd7 10.c4! : 7...Nc6 8.Re1 Be7 9.c3!? Maria Nepeina Leconte-Laurain D,simul Castelsarrasin 2002 or Dvorestky-Cook,StJohn 1988 White is threaening to build a strong center with c3-d4 and if 9...Qc7 then 10.a3!? Dom suggestion or the 10.Nf1!? } 8.Qe2 {8.Re1 Nc6 9.h4 Qc7!? 10.Nf1 ooo 11.e5 Nd7 12.Bf4 h6 13.h5 Rdg8 14.Qd2 g5 15.hxg6 Rxg6. Reference: Belotti-Weiss,Mitropa cup 1997 } Qc7!? see Iglesias-Laurain 9.e5 { 9.Re1 Nc6 Lecureux-Laurain,rapides SteFoy d'Aigrefeuille 10.Nf1 Reference: Morozevich-Rozentalis,Lubiewice 1994 10.. h6!? } Nfd7 10.c4!? is interesting for White because after 10..d4 11.Ne4 Black has great difficulties to take e5 pawn thus Black has to play 10...oo when the position is simply equal.
|