Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Why don't I understand endgames? (Read 28012 times)
sssthepro
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 439
Joined: 12/16/06
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #32 - 09/21/08 at 06:31:58
Post Tools
Anymore useful endgame puzzles? I like the mental exercise, and the revelation that I am actually terribly weak at endgames... Wink
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paddy
God Member
*****
Offline


The truth will out!

Posts: 966
Location: Manchester
Joined: 01/10/03
Gender: Male
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #31 - 08/26/08 at 19:37:07
Post Tools
Matemax wrote on 08/26/08 at 13:22:44:
sssthepro wrote on 08/26/08 at 11:19:47:
Ugh, I missed the ...Ke6 or ...Ke5 idea. 

Does anyone have a tablebase? Maybe someone can check.

just go to:
http://www.shredderchess.de/online-schach/online-datenbanken/endspiel-datenbank....


Thanks - that's a really useful site!

I've just played around with it a little and found that White can actually win if his rear pawn is on c2 instead of c3!   

At first just the thought of this made my head spin, then I realized that it is because this time when White plays his king to c4 and Black goes Kc6, then White has c2-c3, forcing the black king to give ground. The white king can reach b5 without Black being able to counterattack as in the original puzzle. 

White either wins the b-pawn or forces through c5-c6 bxc6 Kxc6, reaching a basic winning position: 
1 Kd2 Kc7 2 Kc3 Kd7 3 Kc4 Kc6 (drawn if the pawn is already on c3) 4 c3! Kd7 5 Kb5 and wins.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bocajaka
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 122
Joined: 07/15/08
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #30 - 08/26/08 at 18:58:37
Post Tools
Paddy wrote on 08/26/08 at 00:43:09:
sssthepro wrote on 08/25/08 at 12:43:49:
March the king up the board, force the king to the last rank, exchange the b-pawn with your front c-pawn, and push your extra pawn to become a queen.


It's very tricky though, since it's all down to king moves. Some considerations:


I don't think you missed any ideas as far as I can see. It is tricky but I think your approach was the correct with your conclusions first and then consider which route to take with the king. And last,  “Thou shalt not trade down to K+P unless you can safely bet your first-born child on the result.” (Soltis). So true!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bocajaka
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 122
Joined: 07/15/08
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #29 - 08/26/08 at 18:47:18
Post Tools
No wonder these are difficult when their solution is wrong. I just checked and it's supposed to be a win for white but the tablebase says otherwise. This is not the first time that the book has had the wrong solution to a puzzle, did they not have tablebases in 1998 do you think or is the author just lazzy?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #28 - 08/26/08 at 13:22:44
Post Tools
sssthepro wrote on 08/26/08 at 11:19:47:
Ugh, I missed the ...Ke6 or ...Ke5 idea. 

Does anyone have a tablebase? Maybe someone can check.


just go to:
http://www.shredderchess.de/online-schach/online-datenbanken/endspiel-datenbank....
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sssthepro
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 439
Joined: 12/16/06
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #27 - 08/26/08 at 11:19:47
Post Tools
Ugh, I missed the ...Ke6 or ...Ke5 idea. 

Does anyone have a tablebase? Maybe someone can check.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #26 - 08/26/08 at 07:55:59
Post Tools
It is a draw. Black can attack the pawns from the d-file, so he doesnt require the opposition. If white reaches d5 the opposition is also void as black can pendle between c7and d7. The extra tempo is irrelevant.

Are you sure it is white to play and win as far as I can see there is no way he can win?
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paddy
God Member
*****
Offline


The truth will out!

Posts: 966
Location: Manchester
Joined: 01/10/03
Gender: Male
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #25 - 08/26/08 at 00:43:09
Post Tools
sssthepro wrote on 08/25/08 at 12:43:49:
March the king up the board, force the king to the last rank, exchange the b-pawn with your front c-pawn, and push your extra pawn to become a queen.


That’s the plan, but I think this one should be a draw. It's very tricky though, since it's all down to king moves. Some considerations:

1) If the b7 and c5 pawn are exchanged, White wins if can get his king to c6 (with or without the opposition), or c5 with the opposition, assuming he is not losing his rear c-pawn.

2) If White plays c3-c4 too early he might not be able to gain the opposition later, lacking a tempo move.

3) If the White king goes to d5, Black draws with no problems as long as he can answer Kd5 with …Kc7 or …Kd7.

4) The plan of sending the white king to b5 is far more dangerous, since the b7 pawn hinders Black’s king manoeuvres.

5) Answering Kc4 with Kc6 is OK, but Black must NOT play …Kc6 if White can answer Kc4, which means that Black cannot really prevent Kb5.

6) If the White king reaches b5 with the Black king on c7 or d7, White wins, since the black king must give up more ground to protect the b-pawn and then White is able to play c6, bxc6 Kxc6 with a standard win; so passive play by Black loses.

7) Black must therefore be able to answer Kb6 with a move that attacks the front c-pawn, which means that the black king must be prepared to abandon the b-pawn and deploy actively in counter-attacking against the white pawns.

Ok, let’s try to express this in moves:

1.Kc2 Kc7 2.Kb3 Kd7! - only move- 
[not 2...Kc6? 3.Kc4 Kc7 4.Kb5 Kd7 5.Kb6 Kc8 6.c6 bxc6 7.Kxc6+-] 
3 Kb4 [3.Kc4 Kc6=] 3…Ke6! o.m. and now:
a) 4.Kc4 Ke5! o.m. 5.Kb5 (5.c6 bxc6 6.Kc5 Ke4!= o.m.) 5...Kd5 6.Kb6 (6.c4+ Kd4) 6...Kc4=; 
b) 4.c4 Kd7 o.m. 5.Kb5 Kc7 o.m. 6.Ka5 Kc6 7.Kb4 b6=; 
c) 4.Kb5 Kd5 o.m. 5.c4+ [5.Kb6 Kc4= o.m.] 5...Kd4= 
d) 4.Ka5 Kd5 5.Kb5 Ke4! o.m. 6.Kb6 Kd5 7.c4+ Kd4=

So little material, yet so tricky. Please point out any mistakes or any important ideas I might have missed.

“Thou shalt not trade down to K+P unless you can safely bet your first-born child on the result.” (Soltis)
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sssthepro
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 439
Joined: 12/16/06
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #24 - 08/25/08 at 12:43:49
Post Tools
March the king up the board, force the king to the last rank, exchange the b-pawn with your front c-pawn, and push your extra pawn to become a queen.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bocajaka
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 122
Joined: 07/15/08
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #23 - 08/23/08 at 21:44:00
Post Tools
Even though I feel like things are progressing now and I'm getting more solutions correct because of what I have learnt recently some "elementary" positions are still very difficult for me.

Here is one for example which I'm not quite sure about how to go about solving

White to move and win
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bocajaka
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 122
Joined: 07/15/08
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #22 - 08/23/08 at 20:21:29
Post Tools
I'm back from holiday now, thanks for waiting patiently Smiley

Indeed you are correct. I found this example quite beautiful containing many elementary positions.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Paddy
God Member
*****
Offline


The truth will out!

Posts: 966
Location: Manchester
Joined: 01/10/03
Gender: Male
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #21 - 08/18/08 at 11:05:18
Post Tools
Bocajaka wrote on 08/15/08 at 18:04:11:
Terrific analysis and explanation. If you are not a master of some sort (which I bet you are) then at least you are a master in the endgame in my opinion.

I was thinking about

c) If the Black king is allowed to push the white king back, then the white position will rapidly become critical.

For me endgames are still a mystery and I calculate the most stupid things so for me this statement is not obvious. How do you know this?

It might be interesting for you to know where that second position comes from:

White to move and draw =

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *


Just to give anothe illustration of how little endgame intuition I have. In this starting position I had no idea whether 1.Ka2, 1.Kb1 or 1.Kb2 was the right move. I was thinking about "corresponding squares" which I learnt of Williempie. See how stupid I am....

But it's good to know that these are not in the easy category at least. Although in the book it says they are "elementary positions". Perhaps the meaning is different somehow.


I've not seen this before but it seems to me that this one has very little to do with getting the correct first move and, as with the other two examples I commented on, everything to do with thinking about basic positions. What position does White want to reach? Can he reach it, and if so how? 

Also, if intuition is the sum of what I have learned from experience, I should listen to the voice that tells me that since the action will be confined to the edge of the board, stalemate ideas might come in somewhere.

Well, ideally White would like to reach either the drawn position with just a black h-pawn left or the one with Black left with just a g-pawn no further forward than g5 and unable to take the opposition. So let's see what happens when both kings rush across towards the pawns:

1.Kb2 Kb5 2.Kc3 Kc5 3.Kd3 Kd5 4.Ke3 Ke5 5.Kf3 Kf5 6.Kg3 Kxg5 7.Kh3 
OK, White has lost a pawn, but his king is well placed for defence, and all he needs now is to exchange his g-pawn. Let's looks at the possibilities:
7...h4 allows 8 g3=, so Black has to move his king.
7... Kf6 or Kh6 allow 8 g4=
7...Kf4 8 Kh4 Kf5 9 g3 and any move of the black king allows g4=
7...Kf5 8 Kh4 Kf4 looks like the key line, apparently preventing g4 but then 9 g4! hxg4 is stalemate!
I'd like to say "Voila!" but perhaps I've missed something, since I’ve not reached Position 2.  Let me know please, since I'm definitely not a master.
« Last Edit: 08/18/08 at 15:37:57 by Paddy »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sssthepro
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 439
Joined: 12/16/06
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #20 - 08/18/08 at 10:08:09
Post Tools
I saw a similar endgame before. 

W: Kb1, f2, g2, h2
B: Kg8, a3, c3

White to play and...lose! Cheesy

I took black against a lot of my friends who believed White should win. They started pushing the pawns, and after I successfully blockaded them, they started to thinking of losing a tempo, but found out their their king cannot move.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bocajaka
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 122
Joined: 07/15/08
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #19 - 08/15/08 at 21:24:54
Post Tools
Here is a quite interesting pawn endgame for everyone to solve if they wish:

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *


Hint: to understand this position I experimented with just a lone king against three pawns, basically meaning that the other king is stalemated (see diagram below). I found that the king either stops the pawns or gets stalemated on the first rank.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bocajaka
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 122
Joined: 07/15/08
Re: Why don't I understand endgames?
Reply #18 - 08/15/08 at 18:04:11
Post Tools
Terrific analysis and explanation. If you are not a master of some sort (which I bet you are) then at least you are a master in the endgame in my opinion.

I was thinking about

c) If the Black king is allowed to push the white king back, then the white position will rapidly become critical.

For me endgames are still a mystery and I calculate the most stupid things so for me this statement is not obvious. How do you know this?

It might be interesting for you to know where that second position comes from:

White to move and draw =

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *


Just to give anothe illustration of how little endgame intuition I have. In this starting position I had no idea whether 1.Ka2, 1.Kb1 or 1.Kb2 was the right move. I was thinking about "corresponding squares" which I learnt of Williempie. See how stupid I am....

But it's good to know that these are not in the easy category at least. Although in the book it says they are "elementary positions". Perhaps the meaning is different somehow.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo