GMTonyKosten wrote on 04/12/09 at 17:47:10:
Indeed, is it really about an upcoming repertoire book??
No, it wandered off some time ago when I responded to ghengisclown's condemnation of Robert Synder's (a figure in L.A. scholastic chess) coaching practices. Or maybe it wandered off when he brought that up, I don't know.
What is the best thing to do, start a new thread and hope the same people see it, or just blather on about the thing currently being discussed? I suppose the former, but typically I've been too lazy to do it, and others have been also.
Often an off-topic remark is made very casually, someone answers, and before you know it, there have been four or five posts on that topic. It would not have occurred to the original transgressor that his little off-topic remark warranted a whole new thread.
Really if you expect the threads to remain free of digression, you need much more aggressive moderation. Right now you have the opposite. I complained repeatedly that how to play against 1.c4 was being debated in a thread on the 1.d4 d5 section of the board, and the moderator, I suspect more out of cussedness than anything else, refused to move it.
Further some quite rude posts are allowed to stand. See above for examples.
In this particular case I dont see much of a problem. Very often when a book or line is of big interest the thread wanders of a little at time.
This happens a lot less when there is discussion about some obscure line in the Alekhine. Though of course that subforum is the summum of moderation