Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6 (Read 50073 times)
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #80 - 05/31/09 at 06:38:12
Post Tools
You are correct to point out that the ...Nc6 lines are irrelevant (although never +=, that Bf8-d6-f8 was funny)

To your last line you can add the forced 18...O-O 19.cd ed, and it's just a symbolic advantage to Black in a boring endgame.
Not a White's player dream.

If Bxe5 instead of dxe5 (move 13 or 14), we come back to our standard position with O-O-O & Rg8.
The exact position of the h-pawn does not change that no one can make real progress.

So 6.Bd3 remains a hard nut to crack.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #79 - 05/31/09 at 04:34:20
Post Tools
Continuing the theme of "White has no alternatives": 

After 6...Bg6 7.Bxg6 hg 8.Qe2 Nc6!? 9.Be3 (9.Qb5 Qd7 10.d5 Nd8 11.Qxd7+ Kxd7 12.Bf4, about =) 9...e6 10.O-O-O Nd5, White has:

(a) 11.Ne4 Qd7 and now 12.c4 Nxe3 13.Qxe3 0-0-0 14.Neg5 Bd6 15.c5 Bf8 16.Ne6 Nxe5 17.dxe5 Rxh2 18.Rxd7 Rxh1+ 19.Kc2 Rxd7 20.c6 +=. 
(b) 11. Nxd5 Qxd5 12.c4 Qf5. Here 13.d5 (instead of your 13.Rhf1)13...Nb4 14.a3 Na2+ 15.Kd2 0-0-0 16.Nd4 Qh5 17.Qxh5 Rxh5 18.Ra1 wins the knight a2. Black gets three pawns, so let's call it unclear.

Besides, White can avoid the line Nc6 by the move-order 7.Qe2 first. 

Quote:
10.g4 is not possible if Black switches his 9 & 10th move.
On 19.Qd3 I already pointed out a quick drawer that Black can use or refuse.
Your other "lines" are mainly transpositions about playing Kb1 sooner or later

If 9...Nbd7, it is true that 10.g4 isn't possible. But White gets new ideas and can well do without h2-h4 (or play it only after Black's 0-0). 
12.Kb1 is not a transposition: Qa5 13.Ne5. So White doesn't play h4-h5. 13...Nxe5 14.dxe5 Rd8 15.Qf3 Rxd1+ 16.Rxd1 Nd5 17.Nxd5 cxd5 18.c4 unclear.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #78 - 05/31/09 at 01:29:29
Post Tools
I just thought of an exciting line:

6...Bg6 7.Bxg6 hg 8.Qe2 Nc6!? 9.Be3 e6 10.O-O-O Nd5 11.Nxd5 Qxd5 12.c4 Qf5 13.Rhf1 Nb4! 14.a3 Na2+ 15.Kd2 Bxa3!
16.ba Qa5+ 17.Kc2 Qc3+ 18.Kb1 Qb3+ 19.Qb2 Nc3+ 20.Ka1 Qxb2+ Kxb2 21.Kxb2 Nxd1+ 22.Rxd1 f6

After six consecutive checks, Black has emerged better  Smiley

EDIT:

calming down a bit I see it's hard to make progress here.
Still that's another line Black can use to draw at will, since I don't see where White could deviate.

There's 11.Ne4 Qd7 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.de Be7 14.Kb1 (c4 Qc6) Qa4 15.Bg5 O-O-O 16.c4 Nb4 (again!) 17.a3 Nc6,
but Black has again at least a draw, and possibly more.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #77 - 05/30/09 at 22:05:34
Post Tools
I was talking about 9...Be7 so 8.Bg5 is another matter. (Doubt if it's any better.)

10.g4 is not possible if Black switches his 9 & 10th move.

On 19.Qd3 I already pointed out a quick drawer that Black can use or refuse.

Your other "lines" are mainly transpositions about playing Kb1 sooner or later.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #76 - 05/30/09 at 21:17:04
Post Tools
1.d4 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.f3 exf3 5.Nxf3 Bf5 6.Bd3 Bxd3 7.Qxd3 c6 8.Bf4 e6 9.0-0-0) 9...Be7 10.h4 Nbd7 11.h5 Qa5 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.Bxe5 h6 14.Qg3 Rg8 15.Rdf1 0-0-0 16.a3 Rdf8 17.Kb1 Nd7 18.Bf4 Nb6 19.Rf2 Nc4 20.Qd3

Uruk wrote on 05/30/09 at 15:34:42:
This line is more forced than you imagine, for White at least. [...]
If he forgets to play 12.Ne5, for example, the initiative will quickly pass to Black.

Well, 11...Qa5 attacks pawn h5, so 12. Ne5 is forced. Of the alternatives that White has, let me only mention five: 8. Bg5 (instead of Bf4), 10.g4 Nxg4 11.Rdf1 (instead of 10.h4), 11.Kb1 Qa5 12.Ne5 (instead of 11.h5), 14.Kb1 0-0-0 15.Rhf1 (instead of 14.Qg3), and 19.Qd3, as already mentioned. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #75 - 05/30/09 at 15:34:42
Post Tools
Sorry, what you say is exactly the other way round.

CraigEvans wrote on 05/30/09 at 10:29:08:

if the best that black can do is demonstrate a forced draw in 20+ moves, then


Wrong assumption, Black has a draw in the pocket in my line but can play for more every day, for example 9...Na6

CraigEvans wrote on 05/30/09 at 10:29:08:

white is indeed doing very well (because, realistically, not all people are even capable of memorising 16-move-long variations, especially when they are unforced). As Stefan points out, there are ample possibilities for both sides to deviate


This line is more forced than you imagine, for White at least.
While Black isn't forced is re-rout his Knight to c4, White is obliged to put maximum pressure on g,f files (Ne5, Qg3, Rf1) to keep Black busy.
So the burden of memorization is on White. If he forgets to play 12.Ne5, for example, the initiative will quickly pass to Black.

CraigEvans wrote on 05/30/09 at 10:29:08:

The thread started out looking to prove a black advantage. It now seems to have resigned itself to proving a black equality. (...) Even the hardiest BDGers do not claim that the opening gives an advantage, simply that it gives adequate compensation in a complex position where white has a chance to outplay his opponent.


Really, you misunderstood.
We're saying that if Black is content with half a point, he can get it, steering to a lifeless ending rather than the complex position you dream of.

With that in the pocket, ambitious Blacks will play for more (many options, with O-O or O-O-O...)
and if White is in the least bit confused (when to play Ne5? when Be5? Rhe1 or Rdf1?) he can lose control very quickly.

As an illustration, this thread started to prove 6.Bd3 is already the only move (as 6.Ne5 was indeed careless).
On later moves, it's the same: White hasn't much choice to stay in the game.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
CraigEvans
YaBB Moderator
*****
Offline


If I can't sacrifice a
pawn, I'll throw my rook
in

Posts: 588
Location: Bryn, South Wales
Joined: 07/14/03
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #74 - 05/30/09 at 10:29:08
Post Tools
Uruk, I feel compelled to make a point... if the best that black can do is demonstrate a forced draw in 20+ moves, then:

a) That makes the BDG appear perfectly sound (especially given that, in general, after 20+ moves of most openings black has usually achieved equality)
b) It implies that, should white know the opening better than his opponent then, to use a Zilbermints-type argument, white is indeed doing very well (because, realistically, not all people are even capable of memorising 16-move-long variations, especially when they are unforced). As Stefan points out, there are ample possibilities for both sides to deviate, which (as in any other opening) do not necessarily constitute best play, but could work in practice. This looks very much like a game of chess to me.

The thread started out looking to prove a black advantage. It now seems to have resigned itself to proving a black equality. I would say that, for most BDG fanatics, this is going to be another huge success. Even the hardiest BDGers do not claim that the opening gives an advantage, simply that it gives adequate compensation in a complex position where white has a chance to outplay his opponent. Whilst the best available lines prove 20+ move "forced" draws, then the BDG is in good health indeed.
  

"Give a man a pawn, and he'll smell a rat. Give a man a piece, and he'll smell a patzer." - Me.

"If others have seen further than me, it is because giants have been standing on my shoulders."
Back to top
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #73 - 05/30/09 at 07:48:19
Post Tools
11...Bd6, 11...Ncd5, 11...Nfd5 and 11...Be7 are all interesting. It's only my subjective impression, but I found it easier to demonstrate compensation for White against 9...Be7 than against 9...Na6.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #72 - 05/30/09 at 02:16:58
Post Tools
Stefan Buecker wrote on 05/29/09 at 21:32:08:

There can be no doubt that both sides have plenty of alternatives along the line. 
Just to give an example: 19.Qd3 (instead of Rf2) Nd5 20.Nxd5 Qxd5 21.c4 Qd7 22.d5 f6 23.Rd1 Rd8 24.Qc2 Bc5 25.b4 Bd6 26.Bxd6 Qxd5 27.c5 and White will have a protected passed pawn on d6.


Plenty of alternatives? I think White has to be really precise to keep equilibrium.
19.Qd3 can hardly avoid the draw because after 22...Bf6 23.Qe3 b6
White must bail out with 24.Bxh6! ed 25.cd Bxb2! =

Stefan Buecker wrote on 05/29/09 at 21:32:08:

(a) 11...Ncd5 12.Nxd5
(b) 11...Bd6. Here I had already given an attractive line for White, and you give nothing new. 


I meant there's also ...Ncd5 besides ...Bd6, although I doubt we have enough to push for the win.
So a good positional player can probably play the BDG and hold after all.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #71 - 05/29/09 at 21:32:08
Post Tools
Uruk wrote on 05/29/09 at 19:55:35:
The conclusion about 9...Be7 is that after

10.h4 Nbd7 11.h5 Qa5 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.Bxe5 h6 14.Qg3 Rg8 15.Rdf1 0-0-0 16.a3 Rdf8 17.Kb1 Nd7 18.Bf4 Nb6 19.Rf2 Nc4 20.Qd3

Black can force a draw with ...Nxb2 (enough to make the BDG uninteresting, I think), nevertheless the passive position of the Rooks makes it difficult to play for the win.

That was an 11-move long sample line. You are taking my efforts far too serious to believe that a forced draw at the end would deter any White player from trying that line. There can be no doubt that both sides have plenty of alternatives along the line. 
Just to give an example: 19.Qd3 (instead of Rf2) Nd5 20.Nxd5 Qxd5 21.c4 Qd7 22.d5 f6 23.Rd1 Rd8 24.Qc2 Bc5 25.b4 Bd6 26.Bxd6 Qxd5 27.c5 and White will have a protected passed pawn on d6. That alone should be worth a pawn.  

Uruk wrote on 05/29/09 at 19:55:35:
9...Na6 (going to c7 instead of d7) could well be better.
After 10.a3 Nc7 11.h4 there is ...Ncd5 as well as ...Bd6
White is again fighting for resources.

(a) 11...Ncd5 12.Nxd5
(b) 11...Bd6. Here I had already given an attractive line for White, and you give nothing new. 

Only White is fighting for resources? My impression is that both sides are fighting here.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #70 - 05/29/09 at 19:55:35
Post Tools
The conclusion about 9...Be7 is that after

10.h4 Nbd7 11.h5 Qa5 12.Ne5 Nxe5 13.Bxe5 h6 14.Qg3 Rg8 15.Rdf1 0-0-0 16.a3 Rdf8 17.Kb1 Nd7 18.Bf4 Nb6 19.Rf2 Nc4 20.Qd3

Black can force a draw with ...Nxb2 (enough to make the BDG uninteresting, I think),
nevertheless the passive position of the Rooks makes it difficult to play for the win.

9...Na6 (going to c7 instead of d7) could well be better.
After 10.a3 Nc7 11.h4 there is ...Ncd5 as well as ...Bd6
White is again fighting for resources.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #69 - 05/29/09 at 15:05:42
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 05/29/09 at 13:19:37:
We have already established that Black has a not-very-difficult path to equality with 9...Bd6 10.Be5 Bxe5!?.  

That was better for White, proved by the Monte Carlo thing...  Smiley 
But you are basically right. Dynamic equality, as in the King's Gambit, would be quite an achievement for the BDG, after I had thought for 20+ years that it is either bad (4...c6 5.Bc4) or boring (5.Nxe4). 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #68 - 05/29/09 at 13:19:37
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 05/29/09 at 07:00:07:
Stefan, why does Black have to play 9...Na6?  It looks slow, cumbersome and unthreatening.  I prefer an immediate 9...Be7 unless there's some tactical reason against it.  


9...Na6 may or may not be cumbersome, but it's not as slow as it seems since the immediate threat is 10...Nb4 11.Q~ Nd5, exchanging another minor piece.  Further, what is White doing in the mean time?  I'm not sure which 9th move is best, and you may be right that 9...Be7 is good.  To me though, 9...Be7 looks worse than the other moves because it does nothing to inconvenience White.  Almost always when I'm a pawn up, I'm looking for ways to simplify, and in the BDG I think it's an excellent rule of thumb that Black needs to bring off at least two sets of minor pieces before he can hope to make good on his material advantage.

I haven't yet had the time to examine Stefan's analysis just above.  I certainly will, however, and return with my reaction.  But I note that in Stefan's latest line, fully three sets of minor pieces have come off, which in my view is quite hopeful for Black.

In general though, I am quite sympathetic to your remarks about the doubtful nature of White's compensation.  At best it seems just enough to maintain equality.  We have already established that Black has a not-very-difficult path to equality with 9...Bd6 10.Be5 Bxe5!?.  This makes Stefan happy because he only wants to show that 6.Bd3 does not result in disadvantage.  The question therefore is, does Black have more?   
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Stefan Buecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1386
Location: Germany
Joined: 02/11/09
Gender: Male
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #67 - 05/29/09 at 07:29:54
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 05/29/09 at 07:00:07:
Stefan, why does Black have to play 9...Na6?  It looks slow, cumbersome and unthreatening.  I prefer an immediate 9...Be7 unless there's some tactical reason against it.  

This seems to be yet another classic case of White claiming compensation for a lost pawn because... he lost a pawn.

I ran some variations through Fritz and came up with the same answers:  as long as Black is even moderately careful, White can only hope for one of two results.  So I don't see why this "compensation" is worth the effort of all this analysis.  

White does have some play for the pawn, but in most cases he's just down a pawn after trying for a few cute tactical shots.  Sounds like the same old BDG story all over again.

9...Be7 was already mentioned in replies #7, #26-46. If Fritz doesn't agree with our findings, he can perhaps submit a few concrete lines.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Open challenge to Uruk 6..c6
Reply #66 - 05/29/09 at 07:25:33
Post Tools
As a postscript to my previous note...

I just re-read the earlier comments of Markovich.  If I've gained a pawn, I don't mind making one or two consolidating moves.  I find 9...Be7 more to my taste than 9...Na6.  However, the fact that Black has at least three moves that give him at least an equal game should show the dearth of White's ideas here.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo