Sorry, what you say is exactly the other way round.
CraigEvans wrote on 05/30/09 at 10:29:08:
if the best that black can do is demonstrate a forced draw in 20+ moves, then
Wrong assumption, Black has a draw in the pocket in my line but can play for more every day, for example 9...Na6
CraigEvans wrote on 05/30/09 at 10:29:08:
white is indeed doing very well (because, realistically, not all people are even capable of memorising 16-move-long variations, especially when they are unforced). As Stefan points out, there are ample possibilities for both sides to deviate
This line is more forced than you imagine, for White at least.
While Black isn't forced is re-rout his Knight to c4, White is obliged to put maximum pressure on g,f files (Ne5, Qg3, Rf1) to keep Black busy.
So the burden of memorization is on White. If he forgets to play 12.Ne5, for example, the initiative will quickly pass to Black.
CraigEvans wrote on 05/30/09 at 10:29:08:
The thread started out looking to prove a black advantage. It now seems to have resigned itself to proving a black equality. (...) Even the hardiest BDGers do not claim that the opening gives an advantage, simply that it gives adequate compensation in a complex position where white has a chance to outplay his opponent.
Really, you misunderstood.
We're saying that if Black is content with half a point, he can get it, steering to a lifeless ending rather than the complex position you dream of.
With that in the pocket, ambitious Blacks will play for more (many options, with O-O or O-O-O...)
and if White is in the least bit confused (when to play Ne5? when Be5? Rhe1 or Rdf1?) he can lose control very quickly.
As an illustration, this thread started to prove 6.Bd3 is already the only move (as 6.Ne5 was indeed careless).
On later moves, it's the same: White hasn't much choice to stay in the game.