I began also with french defence, mainly because in old times als 1.e4 player I had always difficulties against it.
Unfortunately I had also problems with black playing the french. At the time I switched to closed openings with white I also changed my repertoire with black and now play Caro-kann defence and Qd6 Scandinvian and value the reliability of these defences, which I always missed in the french. Somehow in every system I had the feeling that I stood very close to defeat from the very beginning and I had to use tactics to hold the position.
I come back to the french from time to time, because it produces very very interesting positions and it offers almost always chances for counter attack - however in most cases for me it´s the rubinstein fort knox.
And I´m not so sure, if one can speak of the french in case of fort knox, because pawn structures resemble more the caro-kann and scandinavian - but at least it´s a french beginning.
What I consider as a huge disadvantage of the french is that it affords knowing a lot of opening and middlegame theory - may be more theory a sicilian player needs to know. If you can play hedgehog structures the sicilian world is open to you. As a french player you have to master isolani positions; backward pawns; closed pawn chains and not seldom everything during one game.
In addition it´s not that bad if you know how to repulse mating attacks and you have nerves of steel. I can´t remember a single game, in which my king was really safe.
Teaching youngsters I nowadays very seldom recommend the french.
With regard to the practical chances in OTB games I consider the french behind 1...e5; sicilian, Caro-Kann and since the birth of the
Qd6 scandinavian only the fifth best choice in defending against 1.e4.
I´m sure french players disagree and defend "their" french right to the last cartridge

One reason for me not to play 1.e4 anymore
greetings
Gilmour