Computers dont see everything, especially not in the opening fase. Computer see into the so called horizone and not
further. Many positons in Dragon are incorrectly computer evaluated in the opening fase. A typical example is in
regular dragon yugoslav attack 9 0-0-0 d5 when white takes the pawn and grabs Rook at a8 computers thinks white is
much better but a few forced moves later the opposete in shown. An other example is this line

1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 d6 3. d4 cxd4
4. Nxd4 Nf6 5. Nc3 g6 6. Be3 Bg7 7. f3 O-O 8. Qd2 Nc6 9. O-O-O d5 10. exd5 Nxd5
11. Nxc6 bxc6 12. Nxd5 cxd5 13. Qxd5 Qc7 14. Qc5 Qb7 15. Qa3 Bf5 16. Bd3 Rab8
17. b3 Qc6 18. Bxf5 Qc3 * 

Qc3 was invented by Golubev and computers fail to see that white is in danger.
At fist sight they think Bd3 is a draw but it loses more or less by force when the more deeplty investigating
the positon and after a while it (correctly) comes to the conclusion that white should return the piece and accept
a slight avantage to black.

If the position is inbalanced (pawn sac,exchange sac, structual weaknesses vs activety , Bishop vs Knight ,Rooks
vs Queen, space advantage vs weak squares or passive pieces) computers has lots of troubles evaluating of 
position. If material is equal and the positon is someting like +0.7 I have a feeling that black is in trouble, 
unless there are deep tactical tricks avaleble or black has active pieces.

Also in some endgames with advanced passed pawns vs piece or conneted passed pawn pawns at one flank vs 
extra pawn the position can be wrongly evaluated.

In my expericne, different engiens evalute the same position diffrently. I remember when Fritz 10 said this positon
is winning for white where books called it equal. Swithed enigne to Rybka and Rybka told the exact opposote.

The importent thing about opening choishes are that you like the resulting positions.
If the positon is complicated values like + 0.3 are playalbe for black.

Computer evaluation can be horribly misleading, and downright wrong at times, especially in far-reaching tactical situations that exceed the horizon. Examples would be the Botvinnik Semi-Slav, the King's Indian Defense, and the Dragon when it concerns opening theory.

Just take the evaluation with a grain of salt. It's not uncommon for a computer to label a position += or =+ when it's theoretically opposite after a few more moves, and the horizon catches up.

Bibs wrote on 08/10/09 at 14:55:55:


Gr8t link! Kinda addictive though...

Tried it on some forum members, famous GMs and an opening

Angel Judo Firm, 
Blitz Men Sir, 
Satan John Oh Moss, 
Cheat Alimony,
Hitler Song, 
Gars Park Ovary, 
Man Kirk, 
Danger Hot 

Now, I guess this thread will never get back on topic or Tobacco Pink!  

GMGolubev wrote on 08/10/09 at 11:35:13:


You may like this:
http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=miguelnajdorf&t=1000&a=n

Alien Fjord Mug
and
Formal Nude Jig

are good ones.

Oh, back to work....

GMGolubev wrote on 08/07/09 at 22:02:15:


I want nothing, as I have no interest in this stuff. But I have seen the name Dragadorf attributed to all lines with ...a6; ...g6; indeed.

MNb wrote on 08/05/09 at 01:14:58:


6.Bg5 is another story completely.

It may transpose in some lines with Bg5-h6 = Be3-h6, but basically it has nothing in common with what is discussed here, imho.

There is 6.f4 a6 also, and many other things. Do you want to have a common name for all lines with ...a6, ...g6 ?!

GMGolubev wrote on 08/07/09 at 21:56:21:


Basically, it is 6.Be3 Bg7 7.f3 a6 without early ...Nc6.

Botvinnik's games are already posted above, thanks.

The way Si Williams is going, you can ask him some time next year if he still thinks the opening is suitable for himself....