SF,

I pray that your nephew is okay and healthy.

Markovich wrote on 07/04/09 at 00:55:09:


Please excuse my temporary absence.  My two-week old nephew had surgery yesterday and I was out of town.  I will make some serious edits to the comments that clearly stepped beyond the pale.

In the future, please message me if you think a thread has inappropriate content.

Thanks all!

Gambit wrote on 07/03/09 at 06:31:26:


Please explain how this relates to Politics.

Gambit wrote on 07/03/09 at 03:19:45:


1. I don't claim to be higher rated. I am. There is a FIDE list. 

Perhaps in a FIDE rated tournament somewhere we can play. Sorry, but I have little interest in playing and beating one-dimensional duffers though, so would be happy not to. The additional pain of spending any free time I have sitting opposite a 'Gambit' I also find rather unappealing. 

2. I play only rarely online, but do so for fun on occasion on ICC.  5 or 15 mins. Happy to play anyone. If you beat me as you may do, well done. If you lose online blitz to me, equally it doesn't matter. Just blitz.
Why should a long game in the virtual company of you appeal? Disturbing notion. Prefer to  flagellate myself with a length of knotted rope.


3. Good luck with your research. Sure you can catch a bus. The truth is waiting....

Gambit wrote on 07/03/09 at 00:48:30:


This last post is horrendous. We get it already. However, if no one recognizes that you invented some crazy scheme, what are you going to do...TROLL US into believing? 

You don't see me go after your beliefs (I hope you're joking, and I just didn't get it) like Atlantis or reincarnation. 

Why do you have such an identity crisis? Does it really matter if anyone credits you or not?

Edited:

HTH,


There is a difference between doing some analyses and playing a bunch of games with it. My information shows it is just analyses. Absent some Stadelman games, I will not call 3...Nge7 anything else than the Zilbermints Gambit.

MNb, you call me a toddler? Okay. Then you are still yet a newborn baby.   

SF, point taken. My apologies for being rather harsh, but some jokers here cannot take the truth if hits them in the face. If someone calls me names, I do that even better. You do not expect me to sit here and just do nothing while people call me names, do you?  

Edited:


I have tried being consistent here. How many times have I explained that not a single Stadelman game, to the best of my knowledge, exists with 3...Nge7? Many times! How many times have I said that before 1996 I had no idea who the guy was? Many times! And how many times have I said that the Zilbermints Gambit is the name 3...Nge7 bears now?

Why is it you never responded to my previous post that many openings have more than one name? Also, all these openings were analysed and played by known players. Games scores exist by Captain Kennedy, Ruth, Lean, Schliemann proving they played the openings named after them.

AGAIN: WHERE ARE STADELMAN'S GAMES with 3...Nge7 ? I have not seen any. Just an undated newspaper clipping from the Philadelphia Inquirer (presumably, for SLS belonged to a Philadelphia chess club). 

So you should be consistent in answering my questions. I plagiarized nothing. How dare you suggest such a thing!! If you and I lived in the 19th century America, it would be a duel with pistols at dawn. Fortunately for you, 21st-century American society has no use for duels anymore. Rather, I suggest you go and do research. Then come back and answer the questions I posed in a manner befitting an adult, not a baby.




Edited:

Gambit wrote on 07/02/09 at 01:49:24:


Wrong. Frankly I don't give a !@#$.
For the rest - the provoker provoked.

I apologize to S_F for making his responsibility harder - I knew in advance LDZ would react like the toddler he is. If he was an adult his reaction would have been: inconistency so what? Who says name giving should be consisting? Not LDZ.

Gambit wrote on 07/02/09 at 01:49:24:


Gambit wrote on 07/03/09 at 00:48:30:


Inconsistent as you are you expect others to sit there and just do nothing while you use abusive language.