I fully agree with Papageno. I found these endgame dvds highly instructive and the presentation above the usual chessbase standard.

I would like to ask you to stop this kind of bashing of a person better sooner than later. Speaking about Karsten Müller, I do know people who have benifited a lot from him as a trainer. However, his presentation style (even if I listen to him in German) is unusual indeed and often might sound kind of arrogant or contemptuous (at least to me, but maybe to others as well).

But remember that everyone of us would have great difficulties in presenting material in a foreign language. This is not different among the Chessbase video lectures who suffer apart from language from many problems: Shirov is a nice guy but sometimes comes little prepared, Van Wely shows great difficulties in finding expressions in English from time to time, Mikhalchishin is very difficult to understand (not to mention that his analysis is often crap), Kasimdzanov's hoarse voice is also clearly not very helpful in a presentation etc. Otherwise, I find Dzindzi's videos also horrible by any standards.

The point that is really to be criticized is that at Chessbase there seems to be no quality management at all with their presentations. Some problems might get solved if they supervised these recordings just a little bit and helped the authors with some major problems.

Please make your vote.