(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › General › General Chess › Two books principle
(Moderators: RoleyPoley, trw, proustiskeen)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Two books principle (Read 5112 times)
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10775
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #13 - 08/22/09 at 19:20:02
Post Tools
Even if you did not intend it that way (but you did write not reliable) you applied it by placing Schwarz in the same category as Schiller etc., namely the unreliable ones. Indeed, pity about that review section still missing. I would love to favourably review a couple of Schwarz books. I would explain why even these days Schwarz on the Göring Gambit is of more use for junior players than Müller/Voigt!
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nyoke
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 593
Location: BELGIUM
Joined: 12/31/06
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #12 - 08/20/09 at 13:00:38
Post Tools
Quote:
In that case it is easy to maintain your two books principle - just rank every book on every opening or by any author you dislike for whatever reason in that same category.


Partly agree. But I did not intend it that way. Some books by Schiller for instance I've found to be reliable. 

Pity we haven't got our reviews section yet...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #11 - 08/16/09 at 01:51:12
Post Tools
There is also the Informant principle for players wishing to avoid the most fashionable lines to reduce their workload: Avoid any opening variation that has 4 or more pages' coverage in the latest Informant.

I think this is a slight exaggeration but the idea is quite clever since by doing this you avoid variations which the opponent has a lot of experience with, e.g. Najdorf, Marshall Attack, Semi-Slav, Queen's Indian, etc.
  
All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Daniel
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 169
Joined: 05/29/06
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #10 - 08/15/09 at 23:12:16
Post Tools
Lapshun's book on the Orangutan is terrible.

About the principle, did that mean the Caro-Kann was unplayable prior to the recent flood of books (Houska, Wells, Karpov)?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Two books principle
Reply #9 - 08/13/09 at 18:30:13
Post Tools
Well I'm very happy to know that Alekhine's is a reliable defense (Davies, Cox).  Or if not Cox, which is merely a Starting Out book, then at least by this coming November there will be Bogdanov.

Oh joy!
  
The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Two books principle
Reply #8 - 08/13/09 at 17:53:41
Post Tools
Maybe the two games principle. Openings are only worth looking into when a tournament winner has played it twice in that tournament.
  
If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SWJediknight
God Member
*****
Offline


Alert... opponent out
of book!

Posts: 916
Joined: 03/14/08
Re: Two books principle
Reply #7 - 08/12/09 at 21:00:18
Post Tools
What level of play does the two books principle apply to though?  I imagine that the Goring and Morra would potentially be worth looking into for many players at sub-IM level at least.

The Morra currently has two reliable books out on it btw: one by Palkovi, which was subsequently eclipsed by Langrock's "The Modern Morra Gambit".

As for the most "marginal" openings, as of 2001 there were two reliable books on the Latvian Gambit (both by Tony Kosten), and as of 1989 there were two reliable books on the Englund Gambit (Henri Grob, 1968, Stefan Bucker, 1988). 

In the meantime I'm pretty sure there have been phases when there were no reliable books out on the Italian/Max Lange Gambits (1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Bc4 Bc5 4.d4 and 4.0-0 Nf6 5.d4, which have recently been shown to be quite playable) and even the Two Knights Defence.

I don't think this two-book principle really works...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10775
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #6 - 08/12/09 at 20:45:27
Post Tools
nyoke wrote on 08/12/09 at 13:37:38:
MNB, in my book that Schwarz is ranked with Schiller, Smith&Hall, ...not under the heading 'reliable'.


In that case it is easy to maintain your two books principle - just rank every book on every opening or by any author you dislike for whatever reason in that same category.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Matemax
God Member
*****
Offline


Chesspub gives you strength!

Posts: 1302
Joined: 11/04/07
Re: Two books principle
Reply #5 - 08/12/09 at 15:00:08
Post Tools
nyoke wrote on 08/12/09 at 13:37:38:
MNB, in my book that Schwarz is ranked with Schiller, Smith&Hall, ...not under the heading 'reliable'.

I also used the Schwarz book ages ago - and it was reliable then (as MNb wrote). There were no comp analysis...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nyoke
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 593
Location: BELGIUM
Joined: 12/31/06
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #4 - 08/12/09 at 13:37:38
Post Tools
MNB, in my book that Schwarz is ranked with Schiller, Smith&Hall, ...not under the heading 'reliable'.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TalJechin
God Member
*****
Offline


There is no secret ingredient.

Posts: 2892
Location: Malmö
Joined: 08/12/04
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #3 - 08/12/09 at 07:57:15
Post Tools
If it's any comfort you could add "2 or more reliable books *within the last five years*" - still, with today's publishing tempo any playable idea may be covered by at least both the SOS and DW.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10775
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #2 - 08/12/09 at 03:43:12
Post Tools
Either it's you or back in 1981 you thought both the Göring Gambit (Schwarz and Smit) and the Morra Gambit (Schwarz and Flesch) worth a look. All four were reliable back then.
  
The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JEH
God Member
*****
Offline


"Football is like Chess,
only without the dice."

Posts: 1456
Location: Reading
Joined: 09/22/05
Gender: Male
Re: Two books principle
Reply #1 - 08/11/09 at 21:08:37
Post Tools
Times changed ages ago. It seems you got left behind  Wink
  
Those who want to go by my perverse footsteps play such pawn structure with fuzzy atypical still strategic orientations

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, stuck in the middlegame with you
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
nyoke
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 593
Location: BELGIUM
Joined: 12/31/06
Gender: Male
Two books principle
08/11/09 at 21:04:11
Post Tools
Is it me, or are the times a-changing. I'v always held as a principle that no opening was worth looking into, if there weren't two (more or less reliable) books on it.
So this now seems to be the case for the Sokolsky (Konikowski's and Lapshuns book), the Larsen (Tait's and Odessky's), the Bird (Taylor and the Vigus mini-repertoire in DW: Flank Openings) and so on and on...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2025. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge