Quote:

The same is true for me actually (at least if I play white) 
The scandinavian with Qd6,g6 is a safe choice, however if white plays something with Nb5 and c4 black has little perspectives and white a position that is easy to play. Ok, the question is how often you get Nb5 and c4 against 2200+ opponents in blitz. I do not know.
The accelerated dragon is an option if I would knew what to do against the Maroczy bind... I had a look at this Shahade video but Im not too impressed by the variations itself. 

Quote:


Learning an opening line is never a waste of time, even if you never will play it. It widens your horizon

Bowen wrote on 11/28/09 at 15:55:25:


Sad but true!! Difficult to put your weapons on!

I'm really a bad blitz player. But my results got far better when I started to play simple opening systems. 

White:
Sokolsky Opening

Black:
QGD-Lasker Variation (terrific weapon!!)
Qd6-Scandinavian with a quick g6 

endali wrote on 11/27/09 at 23:17:38:


The two statements I highlighted don't fit together. I haven't seen his videos, but I honestly thought White was the one who had the most traps to fall into early on in the Accelerated Dragon, and that it's a very solid Sicilian precisely because one inaccuracy by Black is often not not fatal. He gets to develop his pieces fairly quickly compared to other Sicilians, after all. This was also Silman's argument when he recommended it as the prefect blitz opening.

Could you give examples of those second-best moves by the very knowledgable Shahade?

I've found defences that encourage White to take a big space advantage and maintain/defend it work even better in blitz than in long games. (maybe this says more about my playing style than about blitz though...) 

A space advantage that could eventually squeeze Black to death with accurate, prophylactic play controlling all pawn breaks and counterattacks, is much harder to manage with little time. So:

Against 1.e4:

- The French
- The Alekhine
- The Modern
- The Accelerated Dragon
- The Kan

Against 1.d4:

- The English Defence
- The Benkö Gambit
- The Grünfeld

etc.

The French and English Defence fit together repertoire-wise of course (1...e6 against everything); a useful addition could be the Blumenfeld for 1.d4 e6 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.c4 (3...c5 4.d5 b5!?) which is stylistically different but gives Black traps and attacking chances.

After space, who is more likely to get attacking chances would be my second consideration. The initiative is extremely important in blitz! So stuff like the Marshall Gambit, The Möller/Arkhangel and the Albin should be interesting. In the end it depends on the level of play and the opponent's style and preparation too of course.

How about the Gurgenidze line, with c6, g6, Bh6?  It's baroque, sharp, and bound to catch quite a few scalps.

Of course, you can't rely on anything like that for long-term success.

Or you could just play a scaled-down version of your main opening repertoire and throw in a few obscure lines at random.

I remember Jeremy SIlman recommending the Benko Gambit and Accelerated Dragon!!!  But at your level these may not be good!  The reason he recommends Benko is the ease of play rooks on a8, b8 fianchetto bishop move queen easy!!   
Now with the acclerated Dragon there are a lot of tricks he said making it good for blitz.  Though at your level you may get a lot of binds.  SO you have to wait patiently...  I think though any opening is good if you know it well.  Knowing the opening well will allow you to set "it" up quickly.  At your level I wouldn't touch the Latvian for example.  I would choose main lines and know them well so you can reply quickly!!!
my 2 cents probably stronger players like Markovic or TN can really answer the question better!
ALso what do you play in slow games vs 1.e4 and 1.d4, just wondering and curious!!
respectfully,
Zatara