The books on your study plan are good, but I wonder why you would study both Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual and Fundamental Chess Endings? There is so much overlap between these two books, and just one of them if you know it inside-out gives enough technical endgame knowledge to play on IM level and probably "normal" GM level too!

So I would just pick one of the two to study in depth, maybe Dvoretsky since I have great faith in him as a teacher. 

FCE is more encyclopedic so you can use it for reference after games and study those endgames you've just encountered in practice, a method recommended by many trainers. You'll be more likely to remember analysis of positions you've recently grappled with yourself. Or as you say read some books by Flear instead, there's very little overlap between his "Practical Endgame Play: Beyond the Basics" and Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual. 

What's missing? I would include one pure "strategic endgames" book like the ones by Soltis, Lars Bo Hansen, Shereshevsky or Müller & Pajeken, and maybe something on tactical endgames too: Bán's "Tactics of End-Games" is a neat little collection if you can get hold of it, while the bigger "Van Perlo's Endgame Tactics" got rave reviews.

Thanks Vandros. That is a good idea, playing the positions against my engine (chessmaster grandmaster edition is the best I have  ).

I'm looking to gain a deep understanding about the endgame, something that will put me above the average 2100-2200 uscf player (I'm 1729 uscf right now). 

My plan is to 1) reread Silman's Complete Endgame Course. 2) Read through Dvoretsky's Endgame Manual. 3) Read Muller and Lamprecht's Fundamental Chess Endings and/or Glenn Fear's endgame books. 

And when I say read, I mean to go over the book enough times that I understand everything in it and can find the correct continuation for any random position I pull out of it. Though I'm not sure how long that would take me with Glenn Fear's or M&L's giant books I would be willing to work towards it.

Does this seem like a good plan? I already have all the books in question. Is there something I would be missing in my understanding if I only used these books?