Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 19
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC (Read 111166 times)
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #226 - 08/05/10 at 18:29:04
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 08/05/10 at 16:33:41:
I too read that article and was wowed by the implications, Markovich. But I will wait for some evidence that it's correct before getting too excited. 

Regarding the slant away from religion some of the recent posts have taken. I'll wait a day or so and decide whether or how to split these off.


You split off the part of Einstein being associated with God, too. Just consider that the "Skeptical Inquirer" the 'Magazine of Science and Reason', in their Special Issue called, "Science and Religion  Conflict or Conciliation" compares Einstein to Jesus Christ.

In that issue on the front cover they morph a photograph of Einstein on the left side of the cover with a man with a halo on the right side of the cover obviously intended to be Jesus Christ.

If you don't think that Einstein is being compared to God, just check out the cover of the "Skeptical Inquirer". Here you have the great bastion of "Science and Reason" accepting every cockamamie piece of claptrap offered by physicists as proof that Einstein can be compared favorably to Jesus Christ.

As for Faith, consider the following question, "Aren't scientific Beliefs Based on Faith as Well?"

"Usually 'faith' refers to beliefs that are accepted without empirical evidence. Most religions have tenets of faith. Science differs from religion because it is the nature of science to test and retest explanations against the natural world. Thus scientific explanations are likely to be built on and modified with new information and new ways of looking at old information. This is quite different from most religious beliefs.

"Therefore, 'belief' is not really an appropriate term to use in science, because testing is such an important part of knowing. If there is a component of faith in science, it is the assumption that the universe operates according to regularities--for example, that the speed of light will not change tomorrow. Even the assumption of that regularity is tested--and thus far has held up well. This 'faith' is very different from religious faith.

"Science is a way of knowing about the natural world. It is limited to explaining the natural world through natural causes. Science can say NOTHING about the supernatural. Whether God exists or not is a question about which science is neutral." (emphasis added)

"Teaching about evolution and the Nature of Science" National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C. 1997.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10775
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #225 - 08/05/10 at 17:02:25
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 08/05/10 at 13:56:38:
Since, however, the discussion appears to be wandering into the nature of space-time, here is something worth noting:  http://www.fqxi.org/community/articles/display/132

There was a longer article in NY Times a couple of weeks ago.  Relatedly, apparently someone named Jacobsen has demonstrated that relativivity and the laws of thermodynamics are merely different ways of expressing the same thing, a rather startling idea to this mere student of science.

If this holds its own I predict a Nobel prize.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #224 - 08/05/10 at 16:33:41
Post Tools
I too read that article and was wowed by the implications, Markovich. But I will wait for some evidence that it's correct before getting too excited. 

Regarding the slant away from religion some of the recent posts have taken. I'll wait a day or so and decide whether or how to split these off.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #223 - 08/05/10 at 13:56:38
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 18:26:15:

It would have been nice to see Jesus walk on water, but some of the other miracles I find unimpressive. 


I am sure that Jesus will be quite depressed when he learns that his miracles have failed to impress sloughter.  I only wish that sloughter had been the Son of God -- then there would have been some really impressive miracles.  

Since, however, the discussion appears to be wandering into the nature of space-time, here is something worth noting:  http://www.fqxi.org/community/articles/display/132

There was a longer article in NY Times a couple of weeks ago.  Relatedly, apparently someone named Jacobsen has demonstrated that relativivity and the laws of thermodynamics are merely different ways of expressing the same thing, a rather startling idea to this mere student of science.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #222 - 08/05/10 at 11:46:21
Post Tools
Uruk wrote on 08/05/10 at 02:17:51:
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 21:45:20:

The sun doesn't enter the equation because it is part of a closed system, the universe

Never let what's in the universe get in the way of sloughter's equations.


Speaking of Sloughter's equation, Stephen Hawking claimed that Einstein's equations for General Relativity would last, "The life of the universe."  Read the New Scientist---"Rethinking Einstein: The End of Space-Time.

"And so space-time--the malleable fabric whose geometry can be changed by the gravity of stars, planets and matter--was born. It is a concept that has served us well, but if physicist Petr Horava is right, it may be no more than a mirage. Horava, who is at the University of California, Berkeley, wants to rip the fabric apart and set time and space free from each other to come up with a unified theory that reconciles the disparate worlds of quantum mechanics and gravity---one (of) the most pressing challenges to modern physics.

Since Horava published his work in January 2009, it has received an astonishing amount of attention. Already more than 250 papers have been written about it. Some researchers have started using to explain away the twin mysteries of dark matter and dark energy. Others are finding that black holes might not behave as we thought. If Horava's idea is right, it could forever change our concept of space and time and lead us to a 'theory of everything' application to all matter an and the forces that act on it.

In Einstein's theories, by contrast, not only are space and time inextricably linked, but the resulting space-time is moulded by the bodies within it.

Shinj Mukohyama  at the University of Tokyo in Japan decided to find out. When he extracted the equations of motion from Horava's theory he found that they came with an extra term that is present in equations derived from general relativity--and this extra term mimics the effect of dark matter.

Yes indeed, Professor Hawking is absolutely right.


  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #221 - 08/05/10 at 11:40:59
Post Tools
Uruk wrote on 08/05/10 at 02:17:51:
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 21:45:20:

The sun doesn't enter the equation because it is part of a closed system, the universe

Never let what's in the universe get in the way of sloughter's equations.

Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do. Wink
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #220 - 08/05/10 at 02:17:51
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 21:45:20:

The sun doesn't enter the equation because it is part of a closed system, the universe

Never let what's in the universe get in the way of sloughter's equations.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #219 - 08/04/10 at 23:12:17
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 21:45:20:
Willempie wrote on 08/04/10 at 15:27:26:
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 03:44:56:
A distinguishing characteristic of life is that it is fundamentally anti-entropic i.e. as the physical world is driven by entropy, life seems to be driven by another process, extropy(?), that tends towards higher levels of order.

Nope, do your thermodynamics again, the law of entropy talks about a closed system (adiabatic). Start with that yellow thingy you see in the sky as part of the equation.

However the subject of life and entropy in itself is quite interesting, in particular when you take into account current industrialisation.


The conversion of physical energy/mass into spiritual energy may be measureable at some point in the future; the conversion of matter into living tissue, may result in a minute change in mass that, presumably eons from now may be measurable.

The sun doesn't enter the equation because it is part of a closed system, the universe, one that I predict will result in a diminution of G, the gravitational constant, through time.

Roll Eyes
The energy given from the sun (and the entropy won there) very much allows for the decrease in entropy.
Dont bs about spiritual energy, because it prolly only goes for humans...
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #218 - 08/04/10 at 21:45:20
Post Tools
Willempie wrote on 08/04/10 at 15:27:26:
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 03:44:56:
A distinguishing characteristic of life is that it is fundamentally anti-entropic i.e. as the physical world is driven by entropy, life seems to be driven by another process, extropy(?), that tends towards higher levels of order.

Nope, do your thermodynamics again, the law of entropy talks about a closed system (adiabatic). Start with that yellow thingy you see in the sky as part of the equation.

However the subject of life and entropy in itself is quite interesting, in particular when you take into account current industrialisation.


The conversion of physical energy/mass into spiritual energy may be measureable at some point in the future; the conversion of matter into living tissue, may result in a minute change in mass that, presumably eons from now may be measurable.

The sun doesn't enter the equation because it is part of a closed system, the universe, one that I predict will result in a diminution of G, the gravitational constant, through time.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Uruk
Senior Member
****
Offline



Posts: 351
Joined: 02/03/09
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #217 - 08/04/10 at 20:48:48
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 06/27/10 at 00:15:28:
up and comer wrote on 06/26/10 at 15:17:46:

What I'm saying is that God made the natural world and all the laws that govern it. 

And what I'm saying is that Hubert the Magical Slug made God.  Alte Hex made Hubert; Abner of Shrewsbury made Alte Hex; The Great Cosmic Horned Toad made Abner of Shrewsbury; and so on

That post is a real classic.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #216 - 08/04/10 at 18:58:09
Post Tools
Abner of Shrewsbury?

Do you mean, 

The abbot of Shrewsbury?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sloughter
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 619
Location: schoharie
Joined: 12/29/08
Gender: Male
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #215 - 08/04/10 at 18:26:15
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 08/04/10 at 13:39:42:
Uruk wrote on 08/04/10 at 05:11:50:
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 03:44:56:

If the universe was dominated by evil e.g. Hitler at the end of eternity, then Satan wins. If the universe is dominated by good at the end of eternity, then God wins.

Who keeps score, one of the players ? Or is Abner of Shrewsbury appointed arbiter ?


I am delighted to see that I am not the only devotee here of Abner of Shrewsbury!


It would have been nice to see Jesus walk on water, but some of the other miracles I find unimpressive. For instance, raising Lazarus from the dead. An interesting article on line featured some of the common sources of popular sayings; some of the items covered was the origin of such things as a "wake", the "graveyard shift" and a "dead ringer".

Upon opening coffins where burial plots were often reused, it was discovered upon opening the coffins that roughly one in 25 had claw marks on the underside of the coffin lids where people had been buried alive.

To deal with this bells would be tied to the fingers of the deceased and someone had to sit up all night to listen for the bell to ring hence the term, "graveyard shift", and, of course, if someone actually rang the bell they would be a "dead ringer". A wake was designed to see if the dead would "wake" up, thus a party was held in the hopes that the deceased would wake up.

To raise Lazarus from the dead would be more impressive if he had been embalmed and his brain in a jar, before he rose from the dead.

Water into wine---a magician could do that easily just by passing his hand over the water with dried out wine powder in the palm of his hand.

Jesus lasted on the cross a "mere" 6 hours. Normally, it took a grown man in good health to take two to three days to die on the cross. And, of course, when he was stabbed, he bled.

According to a copyrighted movie script I wrote called the Christ Chronicles, Christ survived crucifixion, met with God, awoke in the sarcophagus, met the Mary's and his apostles, then holed up in a leper colony where he continued his writings for 30 years. 

Unbeknowst to a beautiful archaeologist, she finds his corpse and his writings but they take a long time to decode because they are so fragile. Slowly it dawns on her that she had discovered the body of Christ and 30 years of additional writing. This provides the basis for the stories as she recreates the logic battles between Christ, writing in parables, and his mysterious scribe, Swadu.

When I told the idea to a producer, he was shocked and horrified because it would destroy the basis of Christianity i.e. that Christ died for our sins. I didn't have the heart to tell him it was just a movie script but it does suggest that Christians are not warm to the idea that Christ did not die on the cross.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Willempie
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 4312
Location: Holland
Joined: 01/07/05
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #214 - 08/04/10 at 15:27:26
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 03:44:56:
A distinguishing characteristic of life is that it is fundamentally anti-entropic i.e. as the physical world is driven by entropy, life seems to be driven by another process, extropy(?), that tends towards higher levels of order.

Nope, do your thermodynamics again, the law of entropy talks about a closed system (adiabatic). Start with that yellow thingy you see in the sky as part of the equation.

However the subject of life and entropy in itself is quite interesting, in particular when you take into account current industrialisation.
  

If nothing else works, a total pig-headed unwillingness to look facts in the face will see us through.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #213 - 08/04/10 at 13:39:42
Post Tools
Uruk wrote on 08/04/10 at 05:11:50:
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 03:44:56:

If the universe was dominated by evil e.g. Hitler at the end of eternity, then Satan wins. If the universe is dominated by good at the end of eternity, then God wins.

Who keeps score, one of the players ? Or is Abner of Shrewsbury appointed arbiter ?


I am delighted to see that I am not the only devotee here of Abner of Shrewsbury!
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10775
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Religion WARNING: CONTROVERSIAL TOPIC
Reply #212 - 08/04/10 at 09:32:01
Post Tools
sloughter wrote on 08/04/10 at 03:44:56:
A distinguishing characteristic of life is that it is fundamentally anti-entropic i.e. as the physical world is driven by entropy, life seems to be driven by another process, extropy(?), that tends towards higher levels of order.

Life needs food. Food is energy. That's the only reason it's "anti-entropic". No exception of thermodynamics here.
When the universe comes to an end your god and your satan will become meaningless.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 ... 19
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo