|
Looking at IM Timothy Taylor's "Bird's Opening" book, he states that he's not really sure what white's best 7th move is in the main line after 1. f4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. e3 g6 4. Be2 Bg7 5. O-O O-O 6. d3 c5. He recommends avoiding the most popular older move, 7. Qe1, and gives 7. Nc3 as his personal choice. He also mentions 7. a4 as an option, and interestingly doesn't seem to mention 7. Ne5, though I haven't read the whole chapter from cover to cover, so I might have just missed it. As a Classical Dutch player, I know that in the analogous position after 1. d4 f5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. g3 e6 4. Bg2 Be7 5. O-O O-O 6. c4 d6 7. Nc3, 7. ... Qe8 is also the old, most popular move that is no longer considered that great. But in the Dutch, 7. ... Nc6 is considered "slightly dubious", as GM Simon Williams says in his "Killer Dutch" DVD (while still recommending it as an occasional weapon for surprise value). 7. ... Ne4 and 7. ... a5 are also considered decent options, so the options between the Bird and Dutch versions of this line are obviously pretty similar. What I'm trying to figure out is why Taylor likes 7. Nc3 so much, when it's considered so inferior in the analogous Dutch line. It seems to have pretty much the same drawback in both, despite black not having his knight on c6 yet in the Bird version, so I'm trying to see how the extra tempo helps white that much in the Bird. In the Dutch, the critical line after 7. ... Nc6 is 8. d5 Ne5 9. Nd4 Nxc4 and white will capture the e6 pawn next. The similar line in the Bird is 7. Nc3 d4 8. Ne4 and Taylor says "Evidently critical is the unexplored 8. ... Nd5", but then states that he couldn't find any games where black played that. I just checked, and I couldn't find any games that continued that way, either. Could it be that Taylor's just assuming 7. Nc3 works because nobody has actually played the most testing continuation, even though it seems apparent that 8. ... Nd5 messes up white's plans? Or is there a concrete reason that this line is so much better for white in the Bird than it is for black in the Dutch? I just hate the idea of playing moves that I know are inferior, even if most opponents aren't that likely to find the "refutation". I'm one of those people who thinks Chess should always be about trying to find the best possible move, and assuming your opponent will find the best move, too. So the concept of "rolling the dice" on an inferior move in the hopes that the opponent won't figure it out just isn't my style.
|