I was browsing in the book, True Lies, by GM Lluis Comas Fabrego. and came across this remark:
Quote:I feel deep respect and admiration for the way Russian players handle this defence [ie the KID] (on the other hand, I have said many times that I have never liked the handling of the King's Indian by the Yugoslavian players).
This remark is at p20 when GM Comas Fabrego is anlaysing the game Botvinnik-Geller, Budapest 1952
http://www.chessgames.com/perl/chessgame?gid=1032256 with notes taken from Geller's book,
The Application of Chess Theory. The author is looking at 15 a3 (given an ? by Geller) and he goes on to show that Geller's assessment was wrong.
But I am interested to know if anyone knows the background to this remark, re the Yugoslav school vs the Russian school.
Interestingly (and not sure whether this is significant for the above question), in Ch 5, a chapter dedicated entirely to the KID Classical Var with 6...Na6, GM Comas Fabrego's fav KID var, he posed as alternatives what he calls the "Yugoslav Variation": 6...e5 7 O-O Nc6 8 d5 Ne7.
That is just the KID Classical Var Main Line according to GM Golubev's book.
Can anyone shed any light on this?
In the early days of the development of the KID (say late 1930s to early 1950s) the Russian (or more correctly Ukrainian) "school" - Bogatyrchuk, Konstantinopolsky, Bronstein, Boleslavsky, Geller... - favoured the ...Nbd7, ...e5 method against the Fianchetto variation, while the Yugoslav approach was with ...c5.
Pedantry corner: with reference to "Uruk's" post, the Spanish GM is generally known as Lluis Comas - the Fabrego part of his name merely reflects the Spanish custom of tagging on the mother's surname after the father's. (Similarly the top Spanish-born GM is Paco Vallejo, not Paco Pons.)