|
I'm around 1700ish USCF - actually lower right now due to a recent slump, but I was as high as 1777 about a year ago, and I think I should be able to get back up there within the next couple of months. I've gone back and forth between e5 and e6 as my main response to e4 over the years, though usually avoiding the mainest of the main lines, which I now think was a mistake. Right now, I'm playing e5 and sticking to the main lines to allow the Ruy Lopez, Scotch, and Two Knights, instead of avoiding them with some of the stuff I've used in the past (Philidor, etc). Against everything besides 1. e4, I've tried quite a few options over the years, and the Classical Dutch is the only thing I've ever been happy playing, so I'm sticking with it, at least against 1. d4 and 1. c4. I recently considered going back to the Tarrasch or trying out the Albin CounterGambit, to play more open games against 1. d4, but a couple of online blitz games reminded me of why I hate answering 1. d4 with d5. At low-intermediate levels, opponents just come up with the oddest second moves, which are theoretically weak, but it's not necessarily easy to prove that with the clock ticking. I'd rather avoid the whole mess and just play the Dutch, which forces them to play my game, instead of trying to figure out theirs. Against flank openings, I actually tend to revert to a Tarrasch Defense type structure (pawns on e6, d5, and c5). The couple of times I've faced 1. b4 in serious tournaments, my opponents were surprised that I improvised great positions out of the opening without having studied that opening at all.
|