Markovich wrote on 06/22/11 at 14:25:42:
Jupp53, what's your rating? Are you up to 2100 or so? If not, no, you should not learn flank openings.
I can't resist commenting on your game; 12...d4 was a weak move, in my opinion. You make a huge donation to White's cause on the kingside.
P.S. You chose the right forum. The theory sections should concern specific chess moves and/or books, DVDs etc.
The rating is a difficult question in my case and I can speak openly about that. (Wouldn't answer so in the net if I were younger and had to search for jobs in the future.) It's an example that rating is sometimes a difficult thing.
For health reasons I mostly start playing worse after two or three hours according to a lack of concentration. And I played three tournaments in the last two years. My rating in those tournaments oscillates around 1850 DWZ.
In standard games on FICS with a time control finishing the games normally between one and two hours my rating is stable around 2050. I ruin it sometimes when playing faster.
In correspondence chess it's around 2100 atm on lss.
So I would conclude - otb I'm 1850, my knowledge is between 2000 and 2100.
About 12. - d4. I'll analyze this game next days. The plan was an exchange of the d4-pawn against one of the white queenside pawns and that was the way the game went. Alternatively black could have secured the d4-pawn with a knight on b3 and start an attack on the queenside. So I'm not so sure about the quality of this move.
Back to topic: The content of your remark is double - edged. Not learning flank openings, but analyzing a position out of a flank opening. Generally this maybe right under the view of playing strength.