|
I change my mind quite often, but here are my current favorites: Against 1.e4: Moskalenko's two books on the french. If I had to choose between them I would choose The Wonderful Winawer. I really like the fact that each chapter begins with verbal explanations of the typical motifs and plans for both sides, a brief history of the variation, pictures of famous french players and french terminators, as well as statistics. To me, a book like this is much more enjoyable to read than most opening books, which are loaded with many different variations, and only brief explanations. I can never remember all of the variations anyway, so for me a book with great explanations is worth much more. Moskalenko's prose is always a joy to read as well. My only complaint is that some lines are analyzed quite heavily, while others are barely looked at at all - within the variations covered in the books of course. Other books for black against 1.e4 I have used in the past that I really enjoyed include: 'The Ruy Lopez: a guide for Black' and 'The Easiest Sicilian.' These books are quite different from each other, but both of them really helped me understand the opening that I was playing at the time. Against 1.d4: This is a hard one, as I have not found a book for black against 1.d4 that really strikes me as awesome. Out of the books I have, the best would probably be Leningrad System by Kindermann. It is quite good, but I would not put it in the same category as the books I mentioned above for black against 1.e4. 'Play the Nimzo-Indian' is quite good as well. I really like the lengthy explanations, as well as the complete games format. I think the book is a little too biased towards black however. As white: I am playing 1.d4 now, so my favourite would probably be 'Playing the Queen's gambit: a grandmaster guide.' I like the repertoire choices, as well as the complete games format. Considering how sharp the repertoire is, I think the author certainly could have analyzed deeper in several places though, or at least explained things a bit more. I have GM repertoire 2, but I do not like it as much. I recognize that it is very good, but I feel it lacks verbal explanations, and I would prefer a complete games format. It is a great book, but I am probably not strong enough yet to appreciate the depth of the analysis, as well as all the novelties. When I played 1.e4 I really liked 'Dismantling the Sicilian.' That book has the right balance of analysis and prose for someone like me, as well as complete games.
|