Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) The best defense against 1.d4! (Read 29298 times)
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #28 - 07/25/11 at 01:29:59
Post Tools
I think it's a temporary lull in the development of QGD theory for White. Some new ideas will eventually emerge. Either that or chess theory is closing in a big way.

At the club level I would look closely at Bxf6 in reply to ...h6, followed by queenside castling and a kingside pawn storm for a winning mechanism that applies the same whether Black intends the Lasker or the Tartakover. White is not ultimately better, but Black's play requires some sophistication. Actually I think that very often in the QGD, White's O-O-O is a good practical try.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #27 - 07/25/11 at 01:15:52
Post Tools
fling wrote on 07/24/11 at 12:10:18:
I have to agree that the slow Slav is annoying, but I am not sure all White players will play this, since it is not too exciting.

Does anyone have a suggested line against the Slow Slav that is not in Vigus' book?


The main line Slav is hardly exciting, either (well, unless black plays the Morozevich Slav, but that's black's decision - not white's). If white's going to get a position that is just "pleasant" (that's all he gets in the Sokolov Slav, too) then he might as well just use the easier method and dedicate his time and resources to finding innovations elsewhere.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #26 - 07/25/11 at 00:29:06
Post Tools
slates wrote on 07/24/11 at 22:40:01:
I am intrigued by BPaulsen's comment about the Sokolov line; I've had a glance through some recent games in the 7...Nb6 line (using Chessbase online database) and can't see that Black is suffering especially anywhere. In fact Black seems to be doing quite well, or so it seemed to me.
Could anyone give me a clue as to the 'simple' variation which might be tripping Black up of late? 
Thanks in advance. Undecided


Black hasn't been getting good counterplay in the critical variations with 9. f3 of late (even Vigus' recommendation leaves black under some pressure if you follow Houdini long enough). It's nothing major, and as I noted earlier white's not being particularly ambitious, but his play is pleasant whereas black gets to sit and wait...forever.

Statistics don't tell the story, either. Most of the time white actually obtains a real edge in the ensuing middlegame (as opposed to just a pleasant position) before blundering later and allowing black off with a draw (or the super rare win).

The positions are most comparable to a Hedgehog without counterplay, where all black can do is sit, wait, and hope white never engineers a breakthrough. Can white achieve a breakthrough that leads to a win against perfect play? Likely not, that's why I just describe his position as pleasant.

Instead of going through that, black's discovered he can just reach full equality in QGD of late, so fashion went that way. If the QGD comes under pressure, then black players might be more willing to suffer some for their draw.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #25 - 07/24/11 at 22:40:01
Post Tools
I am intrigued by BPaulsen's comment about the Sokolov line; I've had a glance through some recent games in the 7...Nb6 line (using Chessbase online database) and can't see that Black is suffering especially anywhere. In fact Black seems to be doing quite well, or so it seemed to me.
Could anyone give me a clue as to the 'simple' variation which might be tripping Black up of late? 
Thanks in advance. Undecided
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #24 - 07/24/11 at 12:10:18
Post Tools
I have to agree that the slow Slav is annoying, but I am not sure all White players will play this, since it is not too exciting.

Does anyone have a suggested line against the Slow Slav that is not in Vigus' book?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #23 - 07/24/11 at 04:06:49
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 07/24/11 at 03:59:41:
Sorry, Bpaulsen. I didn't know what you meant. I haven't read Vigus' book.

Thanks for being patient with me. And I'm sorry I'm slower than most.


It's no big deal, maybe I'm wrong about most people knowing what I'm talking about or perhaps I'm just too lazy to find out. Who knows? Who cares?

You know what I'm talking about now, it's all good, we're on the same page. There's no point in worrying about minor stuff, so don't be too hard on yourself. The names don't matter if you've been playing it anyway. Smiley
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #22 - 07/24/11 at 03:59:41
Post Tools
Sorry, Bpaulsen. I didn't know what you meant. I haven't read Vigus' book.

Thanks for being patient with me. And I'm sorry I'm slower than most.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #21 - 07/24/11 at 02:19:05
Post Tools
If I'm going technical then the Morozevich is Qc7+e5+g5 but I don't feel like being particularly nuanced, nor does the naming matter when most people know what I'm referring to. 

I'm not concerned with giving proper credit to whomever played something first, because otherwise we'd be calling Hedgehogs "Paulsen Defenses" (that was actually what Nimzowitsch called it in Chess Praxis), and obviously nobody would know what I was talking about if I did that.

Most people do know what I mean when I say Morozevich and Sokolov Slavs, and that's enough for me.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #20 - 07/24/11 at 00:12:33
Post Tools
BPaulsen, I think Euwe gets credit for that line. He holds an amazing record, perhaps the only player to win back-to-back World Championship matches in exactly the same variation, against Alekhin (games 20 and 21) in 1935. That is, he won as White, then the very next game, won as Black in the same line!

There's already a Dutch Variation of the Slav that is sometimes called the "Euwe" Variation. But if this line is to be named, I still think Euwe deserves credit!

Regarding the naming of the Nb6 line as the "Sokolov Slav", Tukmakov did some cutting-edge analysis back in the 1970s. It seems wrong not to acknowledge Tukmakov, but give credit to Sokolov for the same lines.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #19 - 07/23/11 at 23:48:39
Post Tools
slates wrote on 07/23/11 at 21:09:41:
Thanks for those pointers, BPaulsen - quite enlightening. I haven't followed recent developments but it's interesting that the slow Slav seems to be doing very well. 
In James Vigus' Slav book I wasn't comfortable with the suggested antidote to this line, but perhaps nothing really convincing has crystallised yet. 
What, in your opinion, is the current worth of the ...a6 Chebanenko Slav, as I still think this has appeal to a ...d5 player looking for a good defence to the Queen Pawn?
Whilst I wouldn't dare ever question the validity or longevity of the QGD Tartakower/Lasker lines, the passivity of some of the positions (you mention the equality Black attains, but what about counterplay?) is sometimes troubling to me as my limited chess imagination doesn't always provide a plan beyond maintaining the equality of such positions!
Also, since the Avrukh books, is the Catalan the greatest challenge to the QGD at present? 
Thanks for your thoughts.


a6 Slav is another solid choice, I wouldn't rate it as highly as the main line Slavs, but any problems it does have are very minor. A lot of times the "+=" I've seen claimed in critical variations is an incredibly small one at best, so black's always playable. If you like the positions, then play it.

The Slow Slav is enough to keep me away from using the Slav myself, enough so that I actually use it in Reverse against the London (1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. Bf4 c5 4. e3 Nc6 5. c3 Nh5!?), but that's a matter of taste. White's results aren't so much because his position is outstanding, it's just that it's really easy to play whereas black is the one under pressure to make sure any potential white advantages are neutralized.

Anyway, re: Tartakower Defense, I don't think black ever is really that passive unless he chooses to keep more material on the board and forsakes equalizing earlier. Even then, he's not that passive. In the Lasker black isn't that passive either - he doesn't have great counterplay, but he's just putting his pieces on good squares, simplifying, and equalizing by virtue of his bulletproof position. Lasker is very dry in comparison to the Tartakower where some dynamics usually remain to be played out.

@Smyslov Fan: Morozevich Slav uses Qc7+e5, Sokolov Nb6+a5.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #18 - 07/23/11 at 23:04:06
Post Tools
I think when BPaulsen mentioned the Sokolov Slav he was using the name given to this line in Vigus' recent Slav book and this is indeed the 7...Nb6 line. I know that mainly through ownership of the book rather than my experience with the Slav, though: I know from your posts here that you've been playing it for a very long time, Smyslov Fan, so appreciate the point you make about these naming conventions perhaps not being universally familiar to readers. 
I would assume the Morozovich line to be the one with ...f6 or ...g5, but as I use the Sokolov (Wink) I cant be certain...
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #17 - 07/23/11 at 21:29:32
Post Tools
BPaulsen wrote on 07/23/11 at 19:10:03:
The only reason I can figure for the Slav's perceived dip in popularity of late is the ongoing popularity of the Slow Slav (which makes it incredibly difficult for black to aim for more than a draw), the Morozevich Slav not exactly being in great shape, and the Sokolov Slav white's been using a ridiculously simple variation of late and obtaining pleasant (albeit not that ambitious) play.

Compare that with the QGD where the equality black's been getting has been absolute of late.

As usual it's likely just a fashion thing.

I know, I'm not that good with names.

But I play the Slav fairly regularly and I don't know what these variations are. I know of several innovations Morozevich has made, especially in the lines that go: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 dc4 5.a4 Bf5 6.Ne5 Nbd7 7.Nc4, but I don't know which ones are called the "Morozevich" Slav.

I have even less idea what the Sokolov Slav is. Is it the line, 7....Nb6 because he played it so often?

I know that if I have questions about these names there are others who have even less clue about that.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #16 - 07/23/11 at 21:09:41
Post Tools
Thanks for those pointers, BPaulsen - quite enlightening. I haven't followed recent developments but it's interesting that the slow Slav seems to be doing very well. 
In James Vigus' Slav book I wasn't comfortable with the suggested antidote to this line, but perhaps nothing really convincing has crystallised yet. 
What, in your opinion, is the current worth of the ...a6 Chebanenko Slav, as I still think this has appeal to a ...d5 player looking for a good defence to the Queen Pawn?
Whilst I wouldn't dare ever question the validity or longevity of the QGD Tartakower/Lasker lines, the passivity of some of the positions (you mention the equality Black attains, but what about counterplay?) is sometimes troubling to me as my limited chess imagination doesn't always provide a plan beyond maintaining the equality of such positions!
Also, since the Avrukh books, is the Catalan the greatest challenge to the QGD at present? 
Thanks for your thoughts.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
BPaulsen
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love Light Squares!

Posts: 1702
Location: Anaheim, CA, USA
Joined: 11/02/08
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #15 - 07/23/11 at 19:10:03
Post Tools
The only reason I can figure for the Slav's perceived dip in popularity of late is the ongoing popularity of the Slow Slav (which makes it incredibly difficult for black to aim for more than a draw), the Morozevich Slav not exactly being in great shape, and the Sokolov Slav white's been using a ridiculously simple variation of late and obtaining pleasant (albeit not that ambitious) play.

Compare that with the QGD where the equality black's been getting has been absolute of late.

As usual it's likely just a fashion thing.
  

2288 USCF, 2186 FIDE.

FIDE based on just 27 games.
Back to top
YIMAIM  
IP Logged
 
slates
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 507
Location: England
Joined: 01/27/05
Gender: Male
Re: The best defense against 1.d4!
Reply #14 - 07/22/11 at 17:56:43
Post Tools
Pingudon wrote on 07/21/11 at 18:41:07:
Thanks a lot Zatara, BPaulsen, TN. I enjoy and learn very much reading your answers. I am studying a lot 1...e5. Najdorf is too dangerous, too scary, too much theory. I am trying to choose between KID and Queen gambit decline. Not to sure about which one to choose slav, semislav or Tartakower. Any thoughts?

I used to play the Tartakower and still have a fondness for those positions, but I moved away from the QGD because of the 5.Bf4 lines, Exchange and Catalan, which seemed to offer White rather too many promising options against my defence. 
To limit this I went to the Slav which I find serves me quite well, whether it's the standard ...dxc4 lines or the 4...a6 system. 
I retain an interest in the QGD because of the Tartakower, but I don't get to it very often when I play QGD.
Is the Slav no longer as fashionable? I would have thought it was at least as popular/theoretically sound as ever and as the QGD, although at my level it's more about finding something that I can manage rather than what's best according to theory. Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo