slates wrote on 07/23/11 at 21:09:41:
Thanks for those pointers, BPaulsen - quite enlightening. I haven't followed recent developments but it's interesting that the slow Slav seems to be doing very well.
In James Vigus' Slav book I wasn't comfortable with the suggested antidote to this line, but perhaps nothing really convincing has crystallised yet.
What, in your opinion, is the current worth of the ...a6 Chebanenko Slav, as I still think this has appeal to a ...d5 player looking for a good defence to the Queen Pawn?
Whilst I wouldn't dare ever question the validity or longevity of the QGD Tartakower/Lasker lines, the passivity of some of the positions (you mention the equality Black attains, but what about counterplay?) is sometimes troubling to me as my limited chess imagination doesn't always provide a plan beyond maintaining the equality of such positions!
Also, since the Avrukh books, is the Catalan the greatest challenge to the QGD at present?
Thanks for your thoughts.
a6 Slav is another solid choice, I wouldn't rate it as highly as the main line Slavs, but any problems it does have are very minor. A lot of times the "+=" I've seen claimed in critical variations is an incredibly small one at best, so black's always playable. If you like the positions, then play it.
The Slow Slav is enough to keep me away from using the Slav myself, enough so that I actually use it in Reverse against the London (1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. Bf4 c5 4. e3 Nc6 5. c3 Nh5!?), but that's a matter of taste. White's results aren't so much because his position is outstanding, it's just that it's
really easy to play whereas black is the one under pressure to make sure any potential white advantages are neutralized.
Anyway, re: Tartakower Defense, I don't think black ever is really that passive unless he chooses to keep more material on the board and forsakes equalizing earlier. Even then, he's not that passive. In the Lasker black isn't that passive either - he doesn't have great counterplay, but he's just putting his pieces on good squares, simplifying, and equalizing by virtue of his bulletproof position. Lasker is very dry in comparison to the Tartakower where some dynamics usually remain to be played out.
@Smyslov Fan: Morozevich Slav uses Qc7+e5, Sokolov Nb6+a5.