MNb wrote on 07/22/11 at 20:43:06:
In my opinion the statement that orthodox catholicism made it has to do with several more things than Constantine's conversion only. Three other important factors: the Roman Army early 4th Century consisted of many christian soldiers; christianity was very well organized from the beginning; christianity was very accessible.
I don't think it's accurate to say that Christianity was very well organzied from the beginning--it wasn't. There was an incredibly diverse assortment of various groups that all thought of themselves as "Christians" in one way or another. They argued vehemently amongst themselves, most lacked a clear leadership structure, etc. Many Christians in one city differed substantially from Christians in another.
Perhaps you don't understand what I mean when I say orthodox Christianity? I essentially mean the Christianity that came out of the First Council of Nicea, and that has almost everything to do with Constantine's influence and desire to come up with "a" Christianity for his empire. In many ways I think that the first 3 centuries of Christianity saw a religion that was far more varied in theology, doctrine, and practice than what we see today (and we all know how many differences between Christian churches exist today).
Remember that one of the first things Constantine did as emperor was begin persecuting other Christians. Not to sound too much like the
Da Vinci Code (which I never read), but he really did instigate a Christian "purge." When he was done, most non-orthodox Christians had converted to orthodoxy. He also gave orthodox bishops secular powers to go along with the ecclesiastical ones. Suddenly, a particular type of Christian architecture is permitted by the state. Suddenly, the orthodox Bible is copied and distrubuted at public expense. Non-canonical texts disappear; it's for these reasons that I say orthodox Christianity "made it" because of Constantine.