Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Early Christianity: 50-250 CE (Read 17150 times)
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2928
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: Early Christianity: 50-250 CE
Reply #8 - 07/26/11 at 12:15:36
Post Tools
Its not badly organized, its too well organized to the point of cover-ups.

Ratzinger said "Standards of conduct appropriate to civil society or the workings of a democracy cannot be purely and simply applied to the Church." 

That just about sums it up - above the law. Mind you things are changing and I dont think they'll be getting away with cover-ups anymore. Interesting article here, where the head of what was considered the typical roman Catholic country (Ireland) launches a blistering attack on the Vatican for their cover-ups of child sexual abuse. Amazingly even in recent times despite everything that happened in the past this was still going on from the Vatican.

http://www.spectator.co.uk/alexmassie/7114015/the-political-speech-of-the-year.t...

Would've never happened years ago.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Early Christianity: 50-250 CE
Reply #7 - 07/26/11 at 07:41:22
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 07/26/11 at 06:12:00:
You got to be joking.

Who exactly is that "you"? Everybody but you, as usual?

Btw, only two years ago there were even three antipopes: Pulvermacher, Bawden and Corral. Still I would not conclude that RK-church is badly organized in our days.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Early Christianity: 50-250 CE
Reply #6 - 07/26/11 at 06:12:00
Post Tools
You got to be joking. I studied the early years of Christianity. The first five centuries, to about the time of Emperor Justinian, were full of controversies, heresies, antipopes and the like.

Iconoclast controversy. Pelagianism. Monothesyte controversy. The Council of Chalcedon. Antipopes. Schisms. Who are you kidding, people? There was so much disagreement in the Church popes and patriarchs were excommunicating each other. Antipopes were elected by dissatisfied factions. If you think the United States Congress cannot agree on extending the borrowing limit, you ain't seen nothing.
Back in the 3rd century A.D. the first antipope, Hippolytus, was chosen. He eventually reconciled with the church. These days he is revered as a saint.

Yeah, the Christianity of circa 50 A.D. - 552 A.D. was a lot more diverse and full of disagreements. Look it up on Wikipedia. Lots of info there.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Early Christianity: 50-250 CE
Reply #5 - 07/25/11 at 21:11:05
Post Tools
Not strict at all. I just chose it as a convenient cut-off. If there's interest in discussing the events up to 1517 here, I have no problem. Perhaps if we get really involved in a specific question I'll send it to another topic.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Early Christianity: 50-250 CE
Reply #4 - 07/25/11 at 20:22:28
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 07/23/11 at 01:30:46:
While early Christianity is an absolutely fascinating topic, perhaps it shouldn't be discussed in this thread. Perhaps a new thread devoted to early Christianity would be more appropriate?


Well, you decide. But how strict is that limit of 250 AD?
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10780
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Early Christianity: 50-250 AD
Reply #3 - 07/25/11 at 10:53:01
Post Tools
ErictheRed wrote on 07/22/11 at 21:18:56:
I don't think it's accurate to say that Christianity was very well organzied from the beginning--it wasn't.

At the time Constantine became Emperor Orthodox Christianity was well organized indeed - compared to other religions of course. So it remains an important factor.
Orthodox Catholicism was already well organized when Victor I became pope and that was still the 2nd Century. All other religions had nothing similar.

ErictheRed wrote on 07/22/11 at 21:18:56:
Perhaps you don't understand what I mean when I say orthodox Christianity?

No, I didn't understand that indeed. I think we can speak of Orthodox Christianity already before the Council of Nicea. One reason is that imo that Council did not really cut down on variety. See Arius, Pelagius and Nestor to name the most famous ones; later also monophysitism arose.
In this respect both the Council of Nicea and Constantine's policy were a failure.
« Last Edit: 07/25/11 at 20:23:07 by MNb »  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Why are people Christian?
Reply #2 - 07/23/11 at 01:30:46
Post Tools
While early Christianity is an absolutely fascinating topic, perhaps it shouldn't be discussed in this thread. Perhaps a new thread devoted to early Christianity would be more appropriate?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
ErictheRed
God Member
*****
Offline


USCF National Master

Posts: 2534
Location: USA
Joined: 10/02/05
Re: Why are people Christian?
Reply #1 - 07/22/11 at 21:18:56
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 07/22/11 at 20:43:06:


In my opinion the statement that orthodox catholicism made it has to do with several more things than Constantine's conversion only. Three other important factors: the Roman Army early 4th Century consisted of many christian soldiers; christianity was very well organized from the beginning; christianity was very accessible.


I don't think it's accurate to say that Christianity was very well organzied from the beginning--it wasn't.  There was an incredibly diverse assortment of various groups that all thought of themselves as "Christians" in one way or another.  They argued vehemently amongst themselves, most lacked a clear leadership structure, etc.  Many Christians in one city differed substantially from Christians in another.  

Perhaps you don't understand what I mean when I say orthodox Christianity?  I essentially mean the Christianity that came out of the First Council of Nicea, and that has almost everything to do with Constantine's influence and desire to come up with "a" Christianity for his empire.  In many ways I think that the first 3 centuries of Christianity saw a religion that was far more varied in theology, doctrine, and practice than what we see today (and we all know how many differences between Christian churches exist today).  

Remember that one of the first things Constantine did as emperor was begin persecuting other Christians.  Not to sound too much like the Da Vinci Code (which I never read), but he really did instigate a Christian "purge."  When he was done, most non-orthodox Christians had converted to orthodoxy.  He also gave orthodox bishops secular powers to go along with the ecclesiastical ones.  Suddenly, a particular type of Christian architecture is permitted by the state.  Suddenly, the orthodox Bible is copied and distrubuted at public expense.  Non-canonical texts disappear; it's for these reasons that I say orthodox Christianity "made it" because of Constantine. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
YaBB Moderator
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Early Christianity: 50-250 CE
07/25/11 at 16:37:59
Post Tools
There has been an interesting discussion in another thread about early Christianity. I'm particularly fascinated by this period and have read quite a bit about it. 

However, the topic doesn't really belong in a discussion of why people are Christians today. It deserves its own thread. 

I'll add some of the comments from another thread into this one.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo