(UTC)
Latest Updates:
  ChessPub Forum › General › General Chess › Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
(Moderators: RoleyPoley, trw, proustiskeen)
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Openings that you suspect are a forced loss? (Read 45076 times)
Fromper
Senior Member
****
Offline


GrandPatzer

Posts: 378
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Joined: 03/12/10
Gender: Male
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #9 - 08/08/11 at 22:46:55
Post Tools
Smyslov_Fan wrote on 08/08/11 at 21:59:29:
I'm guessing that Fromper is playing the Smith-Morra in correspondence games against players who are tactically close to 2800 strength but positionally much weaker. 

In my correspondence experience on the black side, I usually get a draw around move 30-40. In that sense, I'm not impressed with it. Having said that, Black must play very accurately, and not rely on silicon variations.


Umm... no. My opponents aren't that high rated, and I rarely play correspondence. My point was just that I know guys rated 1800-2000 who insist the gambit is completely unsound, and I shouldn't play it, but they can't seem to prove why. And despite checking some of the literature on the subject and looking around a little on the internet, I have yet to see any sort of definite refutation, either. 

In fact, a couple of years ago, I saw an IM using the gambit successfully in a tournament where he was shooting for a GM norm (and came very close to getting it). I figure if it's good enough for him, then it's good enough for me to play in the U1800 or U2000 section. Wink

  
GrandPatzer!!!

1777 peak USCF rating - currently 1620 from coming back rusty
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #8 - 08/08/11 at 22:00:22
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 08/08/11 at 20:27:39:
I guess the Sicilian is a forced loss; at Chesscafe I see seven products in the last ten days on beating/crushing it.

Cool

On the other hand, if it was a forced loss, wouldn't one product be enough?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #7 - 08/08/11 at 21:59:29
Post Tools
I'm guessing that Fromper is playing the Smith-Morra in correspondence games against players who are tactically close to 2800 strength but positionally much weaker. 

In my correspondence experience on the black side, I usually get a draw around move 30-40. In that sense, I'm not impressed with it. Having said that, Black must play very accurately, and not rely on silicon variations.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #6 - 08/08/11 at 21:01:14
Post Tools
kylemeister wrote on 08/08/11 at 20:27:39:
I guess the Sicilian is a forced loss; at Chesscafe I see seven products in the last ten days on beating/crushing it.


Don't panic! My new book, 'Play the Suttles Sniper', will be published in the next week, and refutes 1.e4, based on analysis by a team of Duncan Suttles, Charlie Storey and Roman Dzindzichashvili.
  
All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kylemeister
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 4989
Location: USA
Joined: 10/24/05
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #5 - 08/08/11 at 20:27:39
Post Tools
I guess the Sicilian is a forced loss; at Chesscafe I see seven products in the last ten days on beating/crushing it.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #4 - 08/08/11 at 20:03:15
Post Tools
  • Smoking an entire packet of cigarettes during a game
  • Not paying any attention to the opponent's moves
  • Resigning early
  • Playing for a draw
  • 1.f3/2.c3/3.Kf2/4.Ke3/5.Kd3
  • Playing flip-coin chess
  • Spending more time looking at the opponent than at the board
  • Falling asleep
  • Getting completely stoned
  • Mobile phone rings
  • 3 illegal moves, and the game starting at 9am is not a valid reason
  • Physically assaulting the opponent
  • Using a chess computer
  • Chatting on Skype/MSN/Facebook between moves
  • Setting your watch's alarm to beep just after the game starts
  • Genuinely believing that you will lose the game, before it even begins
  • Not letting the wookie win 
  
All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #3 - 08/08/11 at 19:58:11
Post Tools
Fromper wrote on 08/08/11 at 19:04:04:
I know a lot of people sneer at me for playing the Smith-Morra Gambit and say it's unsound, to which my usual reply is "So why do I keep winning with it?"


I am guessing - because you are playing opponents that are relatively low-rated? Most openings are ok when the opponent is not prepared. I even saw a clip at youtube by kingscrusher playing bullet chess. In the clip he says he's addicted to the elephant gambit. Well, would state that he wins despite of his opening. Maybe that goes for you to?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fromper
Senior Member
****
Offline


GrandPatzer

Posts: 378
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Joined: 03/12/10
Gender: Male
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #2 - 08/08/11 at 19:04:04
Post Tools
I know a lot of people sneer at me for playing the Smith-Morra Gambit and say it's unsound, to which my usual reply is "So why do I keep winning with it?"
  
GrandPatzer!!!

1777 peak USCF rating - currently 1620 from coming back rusty
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Uhohspaghettio
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 515
Joined: 02/23/11
Re: Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
Reply #1 - 08/04/11 at 21:58:53
Post Tools
kevinfat wrote on 08/04/11 at 08:00:01:
Do you guys have a list of openings that you suspect/guess are forced losses?


You could "suspect/guess" any opening is a forced win or forced loss. For example 1. e4 .... everything that you put +/= to or +/-, can be considered a forced win that requires unreasonable amounts of analysis. 

kevinfat wrote on 08/04/11 at 08:00:01:
But that proving so would take HUGE HUGE unreasonable amount of analysis.


The same as the above. You can "suspect" anything is a forced loss. What you have is a spectrum of openings, from what you consider sound to what you consider unsound.   

kevinfat wrote on 08/04/11 at 08:00:01:
Please list those candidate opening you believe/estimate are losses  (Traxler(black loss), Lolli attack(black loss) etc.).


The Traxler is looking like a draw by the latest analysis, White does not seem to be winning. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kevinfat
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 93
Joined: 01/06/10
Openings that you suspect are a forced loss?
08/04/11 at 08:00:01
Post Tools
Do you guys have a list of openings that you suspect/guess are forced losses? But that proving so would take HUGE HUGE unreasonable amount of analysis. Please list those candidate opening you believe/estimate are losses  (Traxler(black loss), Lolli attack(black loss) etc.).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 3 4 [5] 
Topic Tools
‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo
 
  « Board Index ‹ Board Top  

ChessPub Forum » Powered by YaBB 2.6.12!
YaBB Forum Software © 2000-2026. All Rights Reserved.

Valid RSS Valid XHTML Valid CSS Powered by Perl Source Forge