Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Delchev on Reti (Read 162094 times)
IMJohnCox
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1551
Location: London
Joined: 01/28/06
Gender: Male
Re: Delchev on Reti
Reply #65 - 02/26/12 at 21:28:50
Post Tools
The main point of contrast is evidently going to be his advocacy of the traditional f4/g5 etc plan in the main neo-Catalan line with ...dxc4, as opposed to Marin's new/old notion of playing d4 and accepting hanging pawns. Intuitively I'm rather with Delchev, but it will interesting to see his case.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Delchev on Reti
Reply #64 - 02/26/12 at 07:54:49
Post Tools
If anyone has the book, how is it, especially compared to Marin's Grandmaster Repertoire 4?
  

Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Delchev on Reti
Reply #63 - 02/23/12 at 02:21:20
Post Tools
This book seems to be listed to purchase on the New In Chess website now, so I infer that it has been published: http://www.newinchess.com/The_Modern_R%C3%A9ti-p-7051.html

Also on London Chess Centre: http://www.ukgamesshop.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=PROD&Product_Code=chnew...
« Last Edit: 02/23/12 at 19:55:12 by Gilchrist is a legend »  

Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Keano
God Member
*****
Offline


Money doesn't talk, it
swears.

Posts: 2928
Location: Toulouse
Joined: 05/25/05
Gender: Male
Re: Delchev on Reti
Reply #62 - 02/20/12 at 15:50:54
Post Tools
But Kamsky is not the typical club player I think we'd agree. Anyhow without worriers we'd have no books, but with the books we generate more worries, and so it goes on.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gilchrist is a legend
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 1039
Location: Manchester, UK
Joined: 03/02/10
Re: Delchev on Reti
Reply #61 - 02/17/12 at 21:42:48
Post Tools
Then White has to play 3. e3 or 3. g3 to avoid the Slav?
  

Creo lo que creo no importa lo que creen los demás.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Pantu
Ex Member
*



Re: Delchev on Reti
Reply #60 - 02/17/12 at 21:35:26
Post Tools
Bibs wrote on 02/17/12 at 01:14:25:
Very few folks play Nf6 intending a Slav. People over-worry. Never seen it, certainly would never occur at club level. 


Kamsky has often played 1 Nf3 Nf6 2 c4 c6 and 1 c4 c6 2 Nf3 Nf6.

The point seems to be that after (say) 1 c4 c6 2 Nf3 d5 3 b3 he can't play the Schlecter slav setup which he is fond of, but delaying ...d5 buys him time for g6/Bg7.

I'm also considering playing this way Smiley
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #59 - 02/17/12 at 18:20:14
Post Tools
MNb wrote on 02/17/12 at 17:27:18:
Markovich wrote on 02/17/12 at 17:07:26:
I maintain my view that for a Slav player, 1...Nf6 is an excellent way to react to 1.Nf3 (and 1.c4).

1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 c6 allows 3.e4 d5 4.exd5 (Caro-Kann) and 4.e5, which might be unpleasant. 


What I advocate after 2.Nc3 is 2...e5 intending 3.g3 Bb4.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MNb
God Member
*****
Offline


Rudolf Spielmann forever

Posts: 10777
Location: Moengo
Joined: 01/05/04
Gender: Male
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #58 - 02/17/12 at 17:27:18
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 02/17/12 at 17:07:26:
I maintain my view that for a Slav player, 1...Nf6 is an excellent way to react to 1.Nf3 (and 1.c4).

1.c4 Nf6 2.Nc3 c6 allows 3.e4 d5 4.exd5 (Caro-Kann) and 4.e5, which might be unpleasant. That's obviously not the case with 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 c6. This position occurred more than 6 000 times acc. to my database, so it's not exactly uncommon.
At the other hand 3.b3 d6 4.Bb2 omitting d2-d4 seems to deserve to be considered. But again I would not call that hacking.
  

The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged.
GC Lichtenberg
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #57 - 02/17/12 at 17:07:26
Post Tools
MartinC wrote on 02/17/12 at 10:12:15:
Dangerous weapons : flank openings and that upcoming Delchev book for chess stars both cover quite a bit of this between them.

You'd maybe not want the Reti stuff from Delchev, although it'd make an alternative, but it seems like he's going to be covering some rather hacky stuff vs 1 Nf3 d5 2 c4 d4 and the Guverich.

Also the flank openings section on chesspub (esp a couple of years back.).

Probably a generic English book/symmetrical english one for when you get that.

Pure hacking vs the KID? Non trivial, especially with Nf3 in. But you've got lots of very interesting positions to choose between.

I couldn't see the reason for two concurrent threads on 1.Nf3, so I joined them.

I maintain my view that for a Slav player, 1...Nf6 is an excellent way to react to 1.Nf3 (and 1.c4). 2.c4 c6 and if 2.e3 or 2.b3, Black can comfortably switch to an Old Indian or King's Indian structure, thus avoiding the Reti anti-Slav thingie.

(1.c4 Nf6 2.Nf3 c6 is the same, while if 2.Nf3, 2...e5 is very good, intending 3.g3 Bb4.)
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #56 - 02/17/12 at 10:12:15
Post Tools
Dangerous weapons : flank openings and that upcoming Delchev book for chess stars both cover quite a bit of this between them.

You'd maybe not want the Reti stuff from Delchev, although it'd make an alternative, but it seems like he's going to be covering some rather hacky stuff vs 1 Nf3 d5 2 c4 d4 and the Guverich.

Also the flank openings section on chesspub (esp a couple of years back.).

Probably a generic English book/symmetrical english one for when you get that.

Pure hacking vs the KID? Non trivial, especially with Nf3 in. But you've got lots of very interesting positions to choose between.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Darthmambo
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 105
Location: USA
Joined: 01/18/03
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #55 - 02/17/12 at 05:45:54
Post Tools
Eclectico wrote on 07/17/11 at 16:02:31:
I usually play a mainline 1.Nf3 repertoire similar to the Kramnik series (Anti-Grunfeld, QGD, Slav, Symmetrical English, and Maroczy Bind).  This positional repertoire suits me fairly well.  However, winning the quiet positions in the Slav and Maroczy usually requires better technical / end game skills than my opponent, which is not always the case Smiley

I'm looking for suggestions to fill in a few holes in my fiesty "backup" repertoire.  These are lines I play in situations where I believe I might have better tactical skills than my opponent or in "must win" games.  I'm not looking for a theoretical edge here, just the practical advantages of unorthodox, tactical play with a bare minimum of theory.

Sensible "hacking" lines after 1.Nf3:

1...d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e4  Kramer's Gambit
1...d5 2.c4 d5 3.b4  Reverse Blumenfeld
1...d5 2.c4 c6 3.e3 Nf6 4.Nc3 e6 5.b3 Gurevich Anti-Slav
1...d5 2.c4 e6 3.d4 Nf6 4.Nc3 Be7 5.Bf4 Blackburn QGD with 0-0-0
1...f5 2.d3 Nf6 3.e4 Anti-Dutch
1...c5 2.e4 d6 (e6, Nc6 ) 3.b4 Sicilian Wing Gambit
1...Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.g4 Nimzo-English

I'm not worried about the various transpositions to the KID / Modern, since I believe white's edge in my mainline repertoire is already tactical enough.  My normal repertoire choice is 1.Nf3 Nf6 (g6) 2.c4 to avoid the grunfeld, benko and NID.  

However, 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.c4 c5 is a real headache if you are looking for a sharp game.  I can't play 2.d4 since my mainline repertoire is designed to avoid the 42646B6264736E64680705/NID and Grunfeld.  Either I need to find some lively gambits in the symmetrical english or chose some offbeat move 2.  Is there a favorable line of something unorthodox where Nf6 is sub-optimal?  

1.Nf3 Nf6 2.b4 seems a good possibility since I'm playing b4 vs. the Sicilian and the Reti Advance.  This would avoid lines of the Orangutan which tend to give black easy play, such as 1.b4 d5 2.Bb2 Qd6 or 1.b4 e5 2.Bb2 Bxb4.  Is the Orangutan with an early Nf3 unbalancing enough to play for a win against an opponent who is better than me in a quiet technical game?

Any other repertoire recommendations greatly appreciated!


Oh and I was also wondering, any books you can reconmend for those back up rep lines?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Darthmambo
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 105
Location: USA
Joined: 01/18/03
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #54 - 02/17/12 at 05:42:35
Post Tools
Nice post. I think I am going to try some of the ideas here in my opening rep. One question for the original poster, I was curiouswhat do you play against the KID? What do you use to hack against that?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #53 - 07/21/11 at 12:15:31
Post Tools
I have played 1...e5 in about 5 unrated bullet games, but that's the best I can say about it.

Also after 1.Nf3 f5 I would have thought that 2.e4 is much more in the hacking spirit than 2.d3.
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JEH
God Member
*****
Offline


"Football is like Chess,
only without the dice."

Posts: 1456
Location: Reading
Joined: 09/22/05
Gender: Male
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #52 - 07/21/11 at 08:43:10
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 07/21/11 at 01:42:25:
Thank you for the game. What were the ratings? Also, is it 2007 or 2009?


Apologies for the scribing error. It was in 2009. 

Neither of us had rapidplay ratings at the time. It was my first rapidplay tournament! Time control, all moves in 30 min. Our grades on the next list were ECF 181 for me (which converts to 2098) and ECF 162 for Ed which converts to 1946. Ed told me he had been using the gambit with some success at fast time controls. 

My brain did a double take on move one as it was trying to comprehend why the black pawn wasn't on d5 and if I could really just take it  Huh
  

Those who want to go by my perverse footsteps play such pawn structure with fuzzy atypical still strategic orientations

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, stuck in the middlegame with you
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Hacking with 1.Nf3
Reply #51 - 07/21/11 at 02:06:09
Post Tools
Here is my first win with the Buss Guss Gambit.

1 Nf3 e5 2 Nxe5 Nc6 3 Nf3 d5 4 g3 Bf5 5 Bg2 Qd7 6 00 000 7 d3 Bh3 8 c3 Bxg2 9 Kxg2 h5 10 h4 f6 11 Nbd2 12 g5 12 Rh1 g4 13 Ne1 d4 14 cxd4 Nxd4 15 Nc2 Qc6+ 0-1, nesska (1874) - Zilbermints, 5 0 r 5-minute blitz, Internet Chess Club, 20 July 2011.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 ... 4 5 [6] 7 8 ... 10
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo