Gilchrist is a legend wrote on 06/06/12 at 18:38:13:
What line exactly is given against the Slav, is it allowing 3...dxc4?
Yes. vs Slav 3. Nc3 dxc4 e4 b5 a4 b4 Nce2
Gilchrist is a legend wrote on 06/06/12 at 18:38:13:
And against the Grünfeld, is Avrukh's GM Repertoire books analyses considered (or any other Grünfeld repertoire book)?
Avrukh's analysis is considered and Dembo's. Probably others too!
Also vs Tarrasch he analyses the lines from Aagaard and Ntrilis. Watson even included a gamefragment from Aagaard playing the Tarrasch vs Rasmussen in 2012 (!!), which Aagaard lost...
In his introduction he states that he does not include a bibliography because it is too big!!
Gilchrist is a legend wrote on 06/06/12 at 18:38:13:
Also what level do you think this book is for? To me from the excerpt it looks quite useful for a wide range of players, certainly for my level (2250-2300 FIDE or according to
http://www.sudburychess.org.uk/EcfEloCalc.htm, approximately 200-205 ECF), but what do you think?
I am rated around 2100 FIDE. But my guess is from 2000-2300? Maybe higher, but I am unable to judge. But I think it is dense enough till 2300.
Basically the book is not a London YAWN system, nor is it a cutting edge sharp theory heavy tome a la "Starting out d4".
But it comes closer way more (of course) to the latter than the first. He proposes active systems, from what I am able to judge at the moment, which gives you chances to play for the initiative but without burning your bridges and ending up in a hopeless junk because of a missed theoretical move at move 15.
And it looks perfect to combine with the probably sharper Schandorff