TN wrote on 04/02/12 at 12:48:22:
I think it would be better to use a 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.d4 ed4 4.Bc4 move order,
I disagree. The Philidor allows Black to keep the position closed. I would prefer 1.e4 e5 2.d4 exd4 3.Bc4 though and after 3...Nc6 4.Nf3 Bc5 (or Nf6 5.O-O Bc5 6.c3) 5.c3 Nf6 6.O-O. The problem of Black's extra options is not urgent on a beginner's level; what matters is to open the centre.
Otherwise I agree with TN that it might be wise to wait a bit with presenting a repertoire and first focus on tactics and elementary endgames.
TN wrote on 04/02/12 at 14:35:42:
Black has more than one way to fully equalise, but he has to be accurate. That's straying a bit from the thread topic though.
Indeed, that should not be a concern. When it becomes it's time for a more serious repertoire anyway.
Here the only relevant question is: does the opening choice allow the beginner to apply all those nice tactics he learns? To develop all pieces smoothly? Thát should be decisive.
And indeed, if he deviates, don't worry, unless his choices are bad, you can explain why ánd can give him better options (I refer to 13.Rac1).
But you should discourage the Italian Four Knights. There is stuff that's so much more exciting!
PANFR wrote on 04/02/12 at 16:02:21:
1.e4 e5 2.d4 ed4 3.Nf3 Bb4+ 4.c3 dc3 5.Nxc3 Bxc3+ 6.dc3 Ne7 has been known as an effortless equalizer since the stone age.
That's not relevant either for a beginner.
Vass wrote on 04/02/12 at 17:04:20:
So you think that it's too early to try teaching him to a repertoire?!
There is a difference between showing a few tactical opening lines he might use in practice and offering a complete and consistent repertoire.