Hello everybody,
I had a discussion with a club mate about which "exotic" endgames one should learn when improving. By this term I mean subjects like B + N vs. K (o.k., that's not
very exotic), R + B vs. R, N + N vs. P, B + B vs. N, but also more common cases like Q vs. R and so on.
I once learned B + N vs. K, when I was about 1600 DWZ, but in the meantime I've forgotten most of it, so if I'd face that endgame tomorrow, I'd probably have to agree to a draw

. Hopefully, I will have refreshed my memory before something like that happens!!
But what are your experiences with that? Would you be able to play successfully some of the aforementioned endgames, if your opponent knows what to do? If yes, at what rating did you learn them? What do those of you who work as chess coaches recommend to your students?
Glenn Flear writes somewhere in his "Practical Endgame Play" that once he was very surprised that his opponent with appr. 2200 ELO managed to mate him in a few minutes with B + N. His opponent explained to him after the game that he had had that same endgame just two weeks before, and that that was the reason for him to know it. So it doesn't seem too common for players under, say, 2000 or 2200 ELO to master B + N vs. K?
What about Q vs. R or R + B vs. R? Have you ever spent time studying it or do you trust your ability to play it without special preparation?
Would the "average Super-GM" know how to play B + B vs. N?
Best regards,
Zwischenzugzwang