ChessPub Forum - Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.?

(UTC)

Latest Updates:

- - -

ChessPub Forum › Chess Publishing Openings › Daring Defences to 1. d4 › Dutch › Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.?

(Moderators: CraigEvans, Hadron, proustiskeen)

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Pages: 1

Topic Tools

Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? (Read 7831 times)

chk God Member Offline a pawn is a pawn Posts: 1063 Location: Athens Joined: 10/26/06 Gender:	Re: Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? Reply #6 - 05/04/12 at 08:15:14	Post Tools	Print Post
	@TalJechin: I understand your point. I am just in experimenting mode. Let's say my proper repertoire is moving towards the Dutch (anti- lines, the Stonewall, the Leningrad and maybe the Classical as well). But in the meantime I also wanted to experiment with different move orders to see White's reactions. But, yes maybe you are right, c4 should be welcomed in principle! @TN: Should look at that. Actually I like vs. the English a setup with ...g6/d6/f5/e5 (in no particular move order), so both the Modern and the Philidor look interesting options to me.

	"I play honestly and I play to win. If I lose, I take my medicine." - Bobby
	IP Logged

TN God Member Offline Posts: 3420 Joined: 11/07/08 Gender:	Re: Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? Reply #5 - 05/03/12 at 08:37:14	Post Tools	Print Post
	It's possible to reach the Dutch Leningrad via. the move order 1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.Nf3 f5, to avoid not only the majority of Anti-Dutch lines but also the b3/Bb2 (without c4 in some cases) setup that Avrukh recommended. Avrukh covers this move order as well though.

	All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
	IP Logged

TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2892 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender:	Re: Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? Reply #4 - 05/03/12 at 08:34:46	Post Tools	Print Post
	MNb wrote on 05/02/12 at 23:56:26: TalJechin wrote on 05/02/12 at 21:34:48: As for alternative routes to the Leningrad, there may be some theoretical snags with most of those, e.g. either a quick h2-h4-h5 or Nc3, without c4, aiming for e2-e4. 1...d6; 2...f5; and 3...Nf6; avoids these snags, while 4...g6; still is the Leningrad. Black has to play the Pirc/Robatsch, Czech or Philidor though. I was thinking about something like: 1.d4 d6 2.g3 f5 3.Bg2 Nf6 4.Nc3 and you basically have a choice of losing a tempo with d6-d5 or allowing e2-e4. Not that it's the end of the world for black though... Quote: or be allowed to enter a non-c4 Leningrad Hmm, I don't understand why you would want that. White's c4-pawn (and it's inability to support d4) is basically the reason for black's counterplay in the Leningrad.


	IP Logged

chk God Member Offline a pawn is a pawn Posts: 1063 Location: Athens Joined: 10/26/06 Gender:	Re: Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? Reply #3 - 05/03/12 at 08:03:30	Post Tools	Print Post
	Interesting - thank you. I understand from what you are saying that the real merit has to do solely with avoiding certain anti-Dutch lines. I am a bit dissapointed as I was trying to reach specifically setups with Nc3 before c4.. Incidentaly, I was thinking about the X-mas variation which looked like a nice universal system, but was reluctant to use it as I feel uneasy with hybrid Dutch setups which include the fianchetto (e.g. I find the Leningrad Stonewall too rigid). Anyway, will investigate further the Modern or Philidor option - there may be something there. I mean a possibility for one to reach certain desirable lines of the Modern (or Philidor) or be allowed to enter a non-c4 Leningrad (w/o the option for an early e4 by White). I think it may be also a nice approach vs. the English. Thanks again

	"I play honestly and I play to win. If I lose, I take my medicine." - Bobby
	IP Logged

MNb God Member Offline Rudolf Spielmann forever Posts: 10777 Location: Moengo Joined: 01/05/04 Gender:	Re: Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? Reply #2 - 05/02/12 at 23:56:26	Post Tools	Print Post
	TalJechin wrote on 05/02/12 at 21:34:48: As for alternative routes to the Leningrad, there may be some theoretical snags with most of those, e.g. either a quick h2-h4-h5 or Nc3, without c4, aiming for e2-e4. 1...d6; 2...f5; and 3...Nf6; avoids these snags, while 4...g6; still is the Leningrad. Black has to play the Pirc/Robatsch, Czech or Philidor though.

	The book had the effect good books usually have: it made the stupids more stupid, the intelligent more intelligent and the other thousands of readers remained unchanged. GC Lichtenberg
	IP Logged

TalJechin God Member Offline There is no secret ingredient. Posts: 2892 Location: Malmö Joined: 08/12/04 Gender:	Re: Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? Reply #1 - 05/02/12 at 21:34:48	Post Tools	Print Post
	Iirc, a French IM named Anic or similar has been using 1...c6 and 2...f5 lots of times - personally I'm sceptical though. As for alternative routes to the Leningrad, there may be some theoretical snags with most of those, e.g. either a quick h2-h4-h5 or Nc3, without c4, aiming for e2-e4. Maybe the Modern could be used if White refuses to play e4, or perhaps the Benonigrad 1.d4 c5 2.d5 f5 provided again that White allows it. The X-mas variation via 1...e6 may be the safest way to reach a kind of Leningrad via a non 1...f5 move order.


	IP Logged

chk God Member Offline a pawn is a pawn Posts: 1063 Location: Athens Joined: 10/26/06 Gender:	Reaching Dutch Leningrad or Classical by transp.? 05/02/12 at 15:18:34	Post Tools	Print Post
	Hi fellow chessfriends! I am currently playing the Dutch Stonewall via the QGD move order. It is not perfect, but a good practical approach. Though the reason I started to play with this move order was to avoid the various anti-Dutch lines, I came to realise that it is often a clever way to confuse your opponent into an inferior setup vs. the Stonewall. I was wondering whether anyone of you has tried sth similar with the Leningrad Dutch, e.g. via the Pirc (1. d4 g6 or 2. d4 d6). I mostly have experience with the system suggested by Kindermann (ML with ...Qe8 & ...a5), but wouldn't mind trying the Nc6 or c6-Leningrad. For instance, I play the Caro-Kann, so maybe 1. d4 c6 could be interesting? I am equally interested with the Classical Dutch (though the obvious choice there is the French - 1.d4 e6, which unfortunately am not planning to add to my repertoire - the slot was taken by the Caro-Kann! ).

	"I play honestly and I play to win. If I lose, I take my medicine." - Bobby
	IP Logged

Pages: 1

Topic Tools

‹ Previous Topic | Next Topic ›

Bookmarks: