Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics (Read 5907 times)
whitecraw
Junior Member
**
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 74
Joined: 11/05/03
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #12 - 06/04/12 at 15:34:35
Post Tools
Kotov - Think Like a Grandmaster !!!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Girkassa
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 433
Joined: 04/07/07
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #11 - 06/03/12 at 18:28:15
Post Tools
A very nice example of "dense"/"bush" tactics, Zwischenzugzwang! I got it right (confirmed by Rybka afterwards), but it took me at least 15 minutes to get all the lines right.

The best example from my own practice must be the following position.

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

White to move and win. If you can find the best move for White and have all the lines right in less than 30 minutes, you made a better job than I did during the game.  Smiley I spent 30 minutes, but was still proud when I found out Fritz needed 2 minutes to find the win. That was back in 2004, but Rybka 4 still needs 20 seconds to show the +- sign (OK, that's on my mini-PC, but still...).
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Zwischenzugzwang
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing
& chess pubs!

Posts: 380
Location: Zotzenbach
Joined: 06/14/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #10 - 06/03/12 at 15:55:09
Post Tools
Analyzing one of my own games, I reached the following position, which is, I think, a very nice example of short and ugly "bush-tactics":

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

White would love to exchange Black's king's bishop - can he play 17.Nc3-a4, or is Black's threat of Nc4xe3 too strong? (Of course, Rybka gives a quick answer, but you might want to try it "by hand"!  Smiley)

Probably you have similar examples at hand. Would be nice if you post some of them!

Best regards,

Zwischenzugzwang
  

What do people mean when they say "Chess is the pawn of the soul"?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
dfan
God Member
*****
Offline


"When you see a bad move,
look for a better one"

Posts: 766
Location: Boston
Joined: 10/04/05
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #9 - 05/17/12 at 12:43:14
Post Tools
Zwischenzugzwang wrote on 05/17/12 at 11:32:41:

He also adviced me to write down the variations when I'm doing training, and it works insofar as then I've no problems to do the calculations without loosing orientation. He promised me that after some time, I would not need the writing-down any more (else it wouldn't make sense anyway, of course), so I hope that's true. I'm sure others have tried that before - what are your experiences?

I'm a big fan of writing down variations when solving problems. I'm working through the Yusupov course this way (as he tells you to do). Here are some points I like about it:
1) It helps you organize your thoughts
2) Its benefits can carry over to actual games if you imagine yourself writing down variations in a "virtual notebook"
3) It makes it easier to compare your answer against the solution and see exactly what you saw and missed.

The main downside is that it can be a bit of a crutch; for example I have an embarrassingly hard time calculating pawn races in real life but writing down the moves makes it trivial.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Zwischenzugzwang
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing
& chess pubs!

Posts: 380
Location: Zotzenbach
Joined: 06/14/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #8 - 05/17/12 at 11:32:41
Post Tools
Thank you so far! A friend has lend me Kotov's "Kak statj grossmejsterom" (I wonder if that's "Play like a Grandmaster"?) and Dvorezkijs "Shkola wysshewo masterstwa" (that should be "School of Chess Excellence"). As those titles indicate, he gave me the Russian editions (he's from Armenia), but I'll try to work through them (at least the diagrams are easy to read  Smiley).

He also adviced me to write down the variations when I'm doing training, and it works insofar as then I've no problems to do the calculations without loosing orientation. He promised me that after some time, I would not need the writing-down any more (else it wouldn't make sense anyway, of course), so I hope that's true. I'm sure others have tried that before - what are your experiences?

Best regards,

Zwischenzugzwang
  

What do people mean when they say "Chess is the pawn of the soul"?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #7 - 05/14/12 at 17:18:15
Post Tools
There is some material in Attack and Defence, but more in School of Chess Excellence 2 - Tactical Play. However, none of these are really about tactics the way you seem to be interested in it. More general tactics training I'd say.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Smyslov_Fan
God Member
Correspondence fan
*****
Offline


Progress depends on the
unreasonable man. ~GBS

Posts: 6902
Joined: 06/15/05
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #6 - 05/14/12 at 16:23:01
Post Tools
I find it amusing that after all the derision heaped on Kotov for talking about trees and shrubs of analysis that even now his basic idea is still alive and well.

Yeah, I know: we don't think like trees or shrubs. But the analogy was apt enough to help thousands of chess players.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TN
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3420
Joined: 11/07/08
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #5 - 05/14/12 at 10:02:25
Post Tools
Zwischenzugzwang wrote on 05/14/12 at 07:15:25:
Hello everybody!

With "long tactics" I mean that sort of tactics one normally finds in puzzle books, where one has to find a somewhat surprising first move and then has to calculate some more or less forced variations until mate or material gain, whereas "dense tactics" are characterized not so much by hard-to-find moves and surprising ideas, but rather by a lot of move order (or rather "capture order") issues, pins and counter-pins, and the one or other zwischenzug. Talking in botanics, whereas "long tactics" are somehow like a tall, elegant pine tree, "dense tactics" are like a short, ugly shrub. I have a nice example in mind, unfortunately I cannot find it at the moment, but I'm sure you got my idea.

I find I have much more problems calculating dense tactics than long tactics. Unfortunately, most books dealing with tactics seem to be rather concerned with the latter than with the former, maybe because dense tactics are considered too trivial or not spectacular enough for the authors?

How best to train dense tactics? Are there any books out there that deal mainly with that topic? Thanks for your advice!

Best regards,

Zwischenzugzwang


Forcing Chess Moves by Charles Hertan has plenty of these 'dense' tactics you describe. It also happens to cover long tactics very well!  Wink
  

All our dreams come true if we have the courage to pursue them.
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Zwischenzugzwang
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing
& chess pubs!

Posts: 380
Location: Zotzenbach
Joined: 06/14/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #4 - 05/14/12 at 08:54:42
Post Tools
That would be nice, thx!  Smiley
  

What do people mean when they say "Chess is the pawn of the soul"?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #3 - 05/14/12 at 08:51:36
Post Tools
Sorry, can't remember what books from Dvoretsky. I can have a look at the ones I have when I get home.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Zwischenzugzwang
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing
& chess pubs!

Posts: 380
Location: Zotzenbach
Joined: 06/14/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #2 - 05/14/12 at 08:05:38
Post Tools
Which is /are the relevant book(s) by Dvoretzky?
  

What do people mean when they say "Chess is the pawn of the soul"?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
fling
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 1591
Joined: 01/21/11
Gender: Male
Re: Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
Reply #1 - 05/14/12 at 07:58:47
Post Tools
EDIT: Removed quote

This topic was described and discussed in Kotov's Play Like A Grandmaster (or was it another title?). I think Dvoretsky also has dealt with this extensively.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Zwischenzugzwang
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing
& chess pubs!

Posts: 380
Location: Zotzenbach
Joined: 06/14/11
Gender: Male
Dense Tactics vs. Long Tactics
05/14/12 at 07:15:25
Post Tools
Hello everybody!

With "long tactics" I mean that sort of tactics one normally finds in puzzle books, where one has to find a somewhat surprising first move and then has to calculate some more or less forced variations until mate or material gain, whereas "dense tactics" are characterized not so much by hard-to-find moves and surprising ideas, but rather by a lot of move order (or rather "capture order") issues, pins and counter-pins, and the one or other zwischenzug. Talking in botanics, whereas "long tactics" are somehow like a tall, elegant pine tree, "dense tactics" are like a short, ugly shrub. I have a nice example in mind, unfortunately I cannot find it at the moment, but I'm sure you got my idea.

I find I have much more problems calculating dense tactics than long tactics. Unfortunately, most books dealing with tactics seem to be rather concerned with the latter than with the former, maybe because dense tactics are considered too trivial or not spectacular enough for the authors?

How best to train dense tactics? Are there any books out there that deal mainly with that topic? Thanks for your advice!

Best regards,

Zwischenzugzwang
  

What do people mean when they say "Chess is the pawn of the soul"?
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo