Normal Topic g- and h-pawns versus g-pawn (Read 1916 times)
Poghosyan
Full Member
***
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 143
Joined: 10/15/11
g- and h-pawns versus g-pawn
07/25/12 at 07:41:50
Post Tools
In this pawn structure the attacking side has practically no winning chances when the defender’s king is on the king side. 

D. 1 is the critical position when the Black king is not cut off. 

D. 1

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

White has an ideal set up but he can win only if he is to move. 

1.Ra8+ Kf7 2.g6+ Ke7 3.h6!+-. 

Note that the analogous position with an h-pawn is dead draw whoever is to move first (see the Thread g- and h-pawns versus g-pawn, D. 8 (upcoming).  

Black to play draws easily by 1…Rb5+ or even with a passiv defence by 1…Rb8 or 1…Kh7. 

D. 2

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

Aronian – Caruana
Wch Blitz 5th Moscow (17), 17.11.2010

54...Rh1 55.Kg4 Rg1+ 56.Kf5 Rh1 57.Re8

Aronian sets a basic trap and Caruana falls for it (but note that it was a blitz game). 

57…Rxh5?

57...Rf1+ is the easiest way to draw since the White king does not have a shelter.  
57...g6+ also draws. 

58.Ra8 g6+ 59.Kf6 Rh1 60.Ra7+ Kg8 61.Kxg6 Kf8 62.Ra8+ Ke7 63.Kg7 1–0

The defence is more difficult if the weaker side's king is cut off from the pawns.

D. 3

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

Flohr - Szabo (rev. flanks)
Budapest  1950
 
1...Rh5

“The black king is a long way from its pawn and by the combined efforts of his forces White overcomes his opponent's resistance” (Kopayev). 

2.h3 Kd5

2...Kd6 loses immediately to 3.Rf6+ and 4.Rg6 (Kopayev).  

D. 3.1

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

3.Re7

Kopayev gives move an exclamation mark. “The king is cut off along the d-file. Now White's task is to advance his pawns with the support of the king, and after the exchange of one of them to obtain a won ending with rook and pawn against rook” (Kopayev).  There is nothing wrong with this plan but White could have won in a more simple way - 3.Rf6 Rh6 4.Kf3 Ke5 5.Ra6 Kf5 6.g4+ Kg5 7.Kg3 Rh8 8.h4+ Kh6 9.g5+ Kg7 10.Ra7+ Kg8 11.Ra8+ Kg7 12.Rxh8 Kxh8 13.Kf4+-.  

3...Kd6 4.Re2 Ra5 5.Kg3

“White begins carrying out his plan” (Kopayev).  

5...Ra4 6.Re8 Kd7 7.Re5

“White has further reduced Black's defensive possibilities: his king cannot stand on the 6th rank due to Rb5, winning the pawn” (Kopayev). 

7...Rb4 8.Kf3 Ra4

D. 3.2

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

1) 9.g3

Speelman considers this as a decisive mistake throwing away the win. "This is a mistake since White needs g3 for his king and if he makes too many pawn moves White risks some some pawn endings being drawn. After 7.g3? I can see no win for White!". In fact White can win but 9.Re4 (2) or 9.g4 (3) the win is fairly straightforward. 

9...Rb4

D. 3.3

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

a) 10.Re4?

Balashov and Prandstetter give this move exclamation mark but in fact it is a mistake throwing away the win. 

D. 3.4

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

a1) 10...Rb3+?

After this move Black is lost. As justly pointed out by Speelman 10...Rb5! (a2) would have drawn.  

11.Kf4 Rb5 12.Re5 Rb4+

12...Rb6 13.h4 Ra6 14.g4 Rb6 15.Kg5 Rb4 16.h5 gxh5 17.Kxh5+- (Euwe). 

13.Kg5 Rb3 14.g4 Rb6 

14...Rxh3 15.Kxg6 Rh8 16.g5+- is hopeless

15.Kh6 Ra6 16.g5. Black resigned, since after h3-h4-h5 the ending is lost.  

Back to D. 3.4

a2) 10...Rb5! 11.Kf4

11.Rg4 Rf5+ (not 11...Rb6? 12.Kf4) 12.Rf4 (12.Ke4 Rf6=) 12...Rh5 (not 12...Ra5? 13.Rf6+-) 13.Rf6 Ke7 (or  13...Rxh3 14.Kg4 Rh8=) 14.Rxg6 Kf7=.  

11...Rf5+! 12.Kg4

12.Ke3 Rh5 13.h4 Ra5=. 

12...Ra5 13.h4 Rb5 14.Kf3 Rf5+ 15.Rf4 Ke6!! 16.Rxf5 Kxf5 17.g4+ Kf6= (Speelman). 

b) 10.h4

D. 3.5

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

b1) 10...Ra4 11.Re4 Ra5

D. 3.6

* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
* * * * * * * *
*

12.g4! 

Speelman considered only 12.Rg4? which is a result-changing mistake -12...Rf5+ 13.Rf4 Ke6!=. 

12…Kd6 13.Kf4 Rb5 14.Re8 Ra5 15.h5 gxg5 16.g5!+-. 

Back to D. 3.5

b2) 10…Kd6 11.Re4 Rb1 12.Kf4 Rb5 13.g4 Ra5 14.Re8 Rb5 15.h5 gxh5

15...Rb4+ 16.Kg5+-.

16.g5!+-. 

c) 10.g4 Rb3+ 11.Kf4 Rxh3 12.Kg5+-.

Back to D. 3.2

2) 9.Re4 Ra3+ 10.Kg4 Ra5 11.Kg3 Rb5   

11...Ra3+ 12.Kh4+-.

12.Rg4 Rb6 13.Kh4 Ke7 14.Kg5 Kf7 15.Kh6 1-0 L.A.Schneider-Romanishin, Buenos Aires Ol 1978 . 

Back to D. 3.2

3) 9.g4 Ra3+

9...Kd6 10.Re4 Ra5 11.h4! Kd5 12.Kf4+-. 

10.Kf4! Rxh3 11.Kg5

Or 11.Re4+-.

11...Rh8 12.Kf6 or 12.Kxg6+-. 
  

Flohr-Szabo__rev__fl__.pgn ( 1 KB | Downloads )
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo