Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Which opening ..... (Read 23153 times)
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 868
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #50 - 03/11/13 at 20:45:04
Post Tools
Fromper wrote on 03/11/13 at 18:35:50:

Yes, there are dozens of books on the French, and they all have a chapter on the Exchange in there somewhere. But it's usually treated as an afterthought: "... and if some patzer actually bothers to play the 'Let's Draw' variation of the French, just play like this."


Books on the French are usually advocating that the French is  good or at least acceptable for Black. If you could avoid or refute it with something as simple as 3 exd5, would they really tell you? Personally I think Kasparov's approach of seizing the initiative with 4. c4 is potentially testing and I've never thought that the "how to play against the Exchange" chapters in the books about the French have ever really documented the best paths for White. My record with the c4 system is played 37 won 13 drawn 17 lost 7. That's against a variety of opposition mostly I would suppose in the 1800 to 2200 range.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Fromper
Senior Member
****
Offline


GrandPatzer

Posts: 378
Location: Chicago, IL, USA
Joined: 03/12/10
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #49 - 03/11/13 at 18:35:50
Post Tools
You're all going to think I'm nuts for suggesting this one, but it's an opening line that was played by both Morphy and Kasparov at their peaks, and I've never heard of a book that covers just this particular line: The Exchange French.

Yes, there are dozens of books on the French, and they all have a chapter on the Exchange in there somewhere. But it's usually treated as an afterthought: "... and if some patzer actually bothers to play the 'Let's Draw' variation of the French, just play like this."

The problem with the Exchange is that there are so many possible reasonable moves that the black French player can't just pick one method of dealing with it and hope to get by. You really need to learn a lot of different setups to deal with all the different possible move orders.

Yes, it's extremely drawish at grandmaster level, but people who buy books on these things aren't grandmasters. After losing two blitz games recently on the black side of this, I went and reread the chapter on it in McDonald's "How to Play Against 1. e4", and realized that his recommendations wouldn't have worked in either of my games, because my opponents with white played differently than anything he mentioned. What they played was probably weaker than the GM level plans he tried to prepare readers against, but they were still the types of reasonable, if not necessarily strongest, moves that club level players actually play.

And that's why I think a book about this would be useful. I'm around 1700ish USCF (give or take 100 either way, depending on my latest slump/winning streak), and this variation still gives me more trouble than any other when I play the French as black. And I know I've heard of several people who have said they've given up the French altogether just to avoid the Exchange.
  

GrandPatzer!!!

1777 peak USCF rating - currently 1620 from coming back rusty
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Zatara
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 422
Location: Virginia
Joined: 02/26/08
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #48 - 02/21/13 at 21:08:12
Post Tools
There has only been one book on the Archangel and its quite old.  Of course Bc5 in archangel and Not Bb7, as 7d3 is good.  Then you can include the two nights in the Giucco and open King's gambit like Kaufman and Markovich recommend....   Maybe you can get Shirov to write a forward...   Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JEH
God Member
*****
Offline


"Football is like Chess,
only without the dice."

Posts: 1456
Location: Reading
Joined: 09/22/05
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #47 - 02/13/13 at 16:33:43
Post Tools
RdC wrote on 02/13/13 at 11:16:23:
Difficult to find an inspiring title though. "Avoid sharp theory and be slightly worse with the Nbd7 KID" isn't the catchiest of titles. 


I suggest "The King's Indian Wall", written by an author with experience writing books with the word Wall in the title.

I'd buy it!
  

Those who want to go by my perverse footsteps play such pawn structure with fuzzy atypical still strategic orientations

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, stuck in the middlegame with you
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 868
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #46 - 02/13/13 at 13:40:04
Post Tools
MartinC wrote on 02/13/13 at 11:46:07:

Actually doesn't that book about that famous old candidates event almost count as a book on the opening? iirc Quite a few examples in there.


I would imagine quite a few games with the exd4, Re8, Nc5, a5, a4, a3 plans. For an exercise in trying to fine tune your judgement and improve your eye for candidate moves, it's instructive to play through some of these classics using an engine to pinpoint exactly where White's error really was, according to the engine. The serious game losing error is often a few moves later than authors of the time suggested with an missed tactic available for White  to restore equality. 
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #45 - 02/13/13 at 11:46:07
Post Tools
I dunno. Play the KID like Bronstein? (Or a bunch of high cachet names from that era.).

The marketing folk have achieved much harder Smiley (That the lines work out less interestingly maybe an issue Wink)

Actually doesn't that book about that famous old candidates event almost count as a book on the opening? iirc Quite a few examples in there.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
RdC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 868
Joined: 05/17/08
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #44 - 02/13/13 at 11:16:23
Post Tools
JEH wrote on 02/13/13 at 10:39:10:
There isn't a book devoted to the KID with Nbd7 (mostly seems to cover Nc6 or Na6). I use it vs Classical mainline and Fianchetto.


There are chapters on it in the 1969 Barden, Keene and Hartson book and in most books on the Kings Indian since. But no-one has written an advocacy book. Difficult to find an inspiring title though. "Avoid sharp theory and be slightly worse with the Nbd7 KID" isn't the catchiest of titles. 

If you play Fianchetto and Classical lines as white, there are plenty of players below GM level who will defend with Nbd7, rather than razor sharp Nc6 stuff.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
JEH
God Member
*****
Offline


"Football is like Chess,
only without the dice."

Posts: 1456
Location: Reading
Joined: 09/22/05
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #43 - 02/13/13 at 10:39:10
Post Tools
There isn't a book devoted to the KID with Nbd7 (mostly seems to cover Nc6 or Na6). I use it vs Classical mainline and Fianchetto. It's an old school mainline, but  there are some GMs still playing that way.

Covered a bit in Dangerous Weapons KID, but I've had to piece together my own repetoire from Megabase.
  

Those who want to go by my perverse footsteps play such pawn structure with fuzzy atypical still strategic orientations

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right, stuck in the middlegame with you
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
SWJediknight
God Member
*****
Offline


Alert... opponent out
of book!

Posts: 916
Joined: 03/14/08
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #42 - 02/12/13 at 23:51:49
Post Tools
John Emms's "Play the Open Games as Black" (Gambit, 2000) offered a pretty comprehensive chapter advocating the Two Knights Defence, which I feel was pretty good at the time that it was written, though the theory on some lines (notably those beginning 4.Ng5) has advanced a fair bit since then, so the repertoire would need some patching up in places.
It does seem that we're currently lacking a good up-to-date source on the Two Knights.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Sylvester
Senior Member
****
Offline


Chess is the ultimate
game!

Posts: 314
Location: Canada
Joined: 07/03/08
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #41 - 02/12/13 at 23:47:49
Post Tools
I think the Schlechter Variation of the Slav Defense has been neglected with an unwarranted brushoff of "drawish". I think someone needs to take a serioius look to find out what kept Schlecter's interest in this variation. I think this rivals your Vienna Variation of the QG.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
katar
Senior Member
****
Offline


look another year went
by

Posts: 462
Location: LA
Joined: 09/21/05
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #40 - 02/12/13 at 23:03:33
Post Tools
I agree re: Two Knights defense for Black.  Pinski 2004 could certainly be improved and updated, and was not a repertoire book besides.  There is no book I know of that approaches the TND from a Black/repertoire point of view, tying together all the move-order issues and transpositions.  Nigel Davies did a chapter which I thought was only so-so.  Below master level I would say about 60% of all 1.e4 e5 games end up as some kind of TND if Black is aiming for it (including Giuoco P. by transposition, Max Lange and anti-ML, Scotch Gambit, 4.Ng5, etc.).  Moreover, recent sources (Gustaffson DVD, Ovetchkin/Lysyj for Chess-stars, Kaufman 2011) have all covered 3...Bc5 rather than 3...Nf6.
  

2078 uscf
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Fllg
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 647
Joined: 05/30/09
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #39 - 02/12/13 at 16:56:39
Post Tools
Beating the Flank Openings by Kotronias is an old but still very good source on the reversed Dragon and White´s early deviations. It offers a complete repertoire for Black.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
barnaby
Senior Member
****
Offline


The night is dark and
full of terrors.

Posts: 345
Joined: 01/09/12
Gender: Female
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #38 - 02/12/13 at 15:07:37
Post Tools
English ...e5 by Raetsky and Chetverik (Everyman 2003) has an entire chapter on the reversed Dragon from black perspective.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Volcanor
Junior Member
**
Offline



Posts: 61
Location: Switzerland
Joined: 03/16/09
Gender: Male
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #37 - 02/12/13 at 14:29:21
Post Tools
I'm surprised that no recent book (less than 15 years) has been published on the Reverse Dragon in the English, that is 1. c4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.g3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.Bg2 Nb6. In my opinion, it's one of the best way to meet the English without allowing transpositions to another opening.

The only book I know which covers this variation in depth is Marin's book from Quality Chess, but it's a white repertoire. I would be intersted in a complete coverage of the Reverse Dragon, or even better for me, I'd like a repertoire book for Black starting after 1.c4 e5 with the Reverse Dragon.

I saw the Chess Base training course "Meet the English Opening" in 60 minutes, from Dejan Bojkov. It's an interesting short introduction on the topic. Enough to confirm that it's what I'd like to play with Black against the English, but really not enough to play it with confidence. 

Let's hope chess publishers will read this and please some of the request in this topic.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
MartinC
God Member
*****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 2115
Joined: 07/24/06
Re: Which opening .....
Reply #36 - 02/05/13 at 10:24:04
Post Tools
Playing well often a problem for me anyway Smiley (Especially here at times. The odd very painful blunder.).

Yes, maybe it does need a bit of diversity. A few catalans creeping in now it seems, even in the North of England.

There is also the worry about having something as sharp, and different, as the Vienna in your repitoire but never coming up. Until it does and..... 

But then you get that sort of thing with everything in the UK.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: [1] 2 3 4
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo