belgian wrote on 11/13/13 at 04:31:43:
ErictheRed wrote on 11/13/13 at 02:14:20:
Despite Anand's position looking good, at no point did it seem White was in any real danger of losing; he found a lot of counterplay.
Not so sure about that.
Black had a number of dangerous ideas a la 34. - Rf8 35. Bxd3 Qd6(!) that look very promising for Black. Andrew Martin points out a few more in his video on chessbase.
Well that's what everyone is saying. I guess the idea is that after 35....Qd6 36.Qg2 Rxf2 37.Rxf2 Rf8 38.Rdd2 Bxf2+ 40.Qxf2 Qxd3 Black has excellent winning chances.
Still...I think that's just the kibbitzer's job, to say what Black should have done. I really like these opposite-colored bishop middlegames, and I think that some of the reason Black didn't win was because White has a lot of play, even down a pawn. With queens on, White has attacking chances sometimes.
So after some shuffling I came up with 34...Rf8 35.Kh2!? with the idea of keeping more pieces on for counterplay. I bet this is what Carlsen had in mind, and my hunch is that this is what Anand was "scared" of when he went for the draw. White has play after 35...Rxf2+ 36.Rxf2 Bxf2 37.Rxd3! for instance. If 35...Bxf2 36.Rxd3! is similar; the rooks stay on the board and Carlsen will get his counterchances despite being down a pawn (Rd7+, Rf1, Rf3, and Qf3 are all ideas in these lines). Having said that, I haven't looked at anyone else's analysis yet, that's just my quick impression (aided with Rybka, of course).
So I dunno, I think people are paying too much attention to the computer in suggesting that Black should have played on. He risked facing a lot of activity for the sake of a pawn.
I could be wrong, but this is why I think Carlsen might take the lead soon. It was Vishy that backed out of the fight, and Carlsen that played very active, fighting chess to my eyes. Unfortunately he had seriously misplayed things earlier, but if he's started from an equal position instead of a much worse one, I wonder what might have happened.