Hadron wrote on 11/01/13 at 21:54:24:
sloughter wrote on 11/01/13 at 15:33:29:
In 1994 I played the first five moves in the opening with Black in 30 games to test a new system, but changed the move order in the Golden Knights Semifinals.
The moves (yes it weakens the dark squares) 1...g6/2...Bg7/3...e6/4...Ne7/5...O-O always followed by d5, never d6; the primary idea is to overprotect the f7 square and assure Black of always reaching a middle game. This move order is so poorly known that most of your opponents will be out of book by move 4, 4...Ne7.
A new system? Traces of the move order including d5 can be traced back to 1856
Yes, you will find the occasional game where this move order is used either directly or by transposition; I recall something like 230 out of a 3,000,000 game data base in 1999. While authors like Soltis, Norwood, Smith and Hall cover the Modern and other defenses by Black, they don't cover the UA.
What I did was organize it and codify it, turning it into an entire opening system. No one else, to the best of my knowledge, had looked thoroughly at move orders like 1.d4 g6 2.c4 Bg7 3.e6 Nc3 4.e4 Ne7 5.Nf3 d5. Where Black's move order is known is in the Reti.
Going hand in hand with the Universal Attack are Universal positions. These are positions where one side has all their pieces in back of their pawns, there are at most one open or two half open files and no piece may be farther advanced than the farthest advance pawn. They are some of the most common and important positions in chess because the possessor of these positions has carved out interior space permitting him to maneuver behind his own lines: Here are a few UP's; these are from Inside Chess v.6 Issue 25-26; many games are from Tilburg, 1993:
Geller-van der Wiel: 1.Nf3 Nf6 2.e4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.d4 O-O 6.Be2 e5 7.O-O Nc6 8.d5 Ne7 9.Bd2 Nh5 10.Rc1 b6 11.Re1 Nf4 12.Bf1 g5 13.h4 gxh4 14.Nxh4 f5 15.g3 Nf4g6 UP's by both sides
Vaiser-Adianto: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.cxd5 cxd5 5.Bf4 Nc6 6.e3 e6 7.Bd3 Bd6 8.Bxd6 Qxd6 9.f4 Bd7 10.Rc1 h6 11.Nf3 UP
Kaidonov-Piket: 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 Bg7 4.e4 d6 5.Be2 O-O 6.Bg5 Nbd7 7.Qd2 c6 8.Rd1 e5 9.Nf3 exd4 10.Nxd4 Re8 11.f3 a5 12.O-O a4 13.Rfe1 Qa5 14.Bf1 Nh5 15.Be3 UP
Andersson-Rozentalis: 1.d4 Nf6 2.Nf3 e6 3.g3 b6 4.Bg2 Bb7 5.O-O Be7 6.c4 O-O 7.Nc3 Ne4 8.Qe2 Nxc3 9.Qxc3 f5 10.b3 Bf6 11.Bb2 b6 12.Rad1 Qe7 13.Ne1 Bxg2 14.Nxg2 Both sides have UP's.
Bareev-Shirov: 1.d4 d5 2.c4 c6 3.Nf3 Nf6 4.Nc3 a6 5.Qb3 e6 6.cxd5 cxd5 7.Bg5 Nc6 8.e3 Be7 9.Bd3 b5 10.O-O Bb7 11.Rfe1 O-O 12.a4 b4 13.Nb1 Nd7 UP
The question then becomes, "If Universal Positions are so common, why not play them from the first move---the rationale behind the Universal Attack?"
I counted something like 50 UP's in just one issue of Inside Chess.