Mad scientist like Steinitz.
My little meter was more to the positional side than attacking, but not by as much as I would guess.
By about the same small amount I am more solid than aggressive.
The one that confuses me is that it has me really far on the calculating side, but I've always considered myself more intuitive. I just use many short calculations to verify my intuition...
It has me as more emotional than calm. As I've gotten older it's been moving more and more towards calm, but damned if I'm not a hothead.
Quote:Mad Scientists believe in justice and principles in chess, and use passion and calculating ability to prove their beliefs. The Mad Scientist is capable of carrying out brilliant attacks, but will only do so when he believes it is the right way - he won't normally play speculatively. More often that not the Mad Scientist is the one facing an attack, and he is willing to do that if he believes the attack is not objectively correct. Mad Scientists are also experimenters, trying different ways to expand the horizons in chess.
That, on the other hand, sounds exactly like me.
It recommends the Vienna Game and King's Gambit as white. The former I've always had an odd fascination with, the latter not so much.
The one place it undoubtedly fails is recommending the black side of the Ruy Lopez. Do. Not. Want.