Thanks guys for the input.
hicetnunc wrote on 06/20/15 at 22:59:43:
Tal ? (BenOni style), Kortchnoï ? (uncompromising play, and Dragon player at some stage too)
Like most (if not all!!) Benoni fans, Tal is one of my hero's. I read through a book or two back when i was at Uni and was thinking of having a look at one of more recent books that has come out. I'd never considered Korchnoi before because i didnt think i shared any openings or traits with him. Which of course isnt a good reason not to study him...
katar wrote on 06/20/15 at 23:15:44:
Spielmann's Art of Sacrifice would be my top suggestion - particularly if you are fascinated by material imbalances. Spielmann annotated 37 of his own games so you can realistically get through it cover to cover. You have to be ok with descriptive notation.
I also read Alekhine's collection of best games and Capablanca's Best Endings by Chernev -- both fantastic. Vukovic wrote in Art of Attack (1960s) that no chess master had added anything new on his subject that was not already fully developed by Capa and Alekhine. (!!!!)
There are a million others, but I would start with Alekhine and Capablanca. Spielmann is just too fun to pass up.
From there you have many fun options, Keres or Bronstein or Botvinnik or Smyslov or Tal -- you can't go wrong.
Urgh, descriptive notation...i have to admit that i have some difficulty going through older books because of this. However, since most of the classics are still only available in that format, i should overcome my aversion to this form of writing.
I think Speilmann, sounds an excellent choice, thank you.
I read through Bronstein's Wizard's apprentice back at Uni and should go through it again but with more attention
.
TN wrote on 06/21/15 at 06:34:46:
I'd repeat what the others say about studying the classics, with two extra points: start with the games from the Romantic era (Greco, Anderssen, Morphy, Chigorin) and work on incorporating their dynamism into your play. Obviously you don't have to go crazy and sacrifice material in every one of your games, but if you play to take the initiative from early in the game you'll find similar tactical opportunities thrown up in your games.
I don't know how thoroughly you analyse your games but checking the opening after each game you play (including blitz games) would be a good way to incorporate opening study without feeling like you're wasting time.
Finally, a good way to find the experts in the openings you play is to use the 'Opening Report' feature on ChessBase. Just try it in a position with some thousands of games and you'll see what I mean.
I admit i dont study my own games in great depth, but i do often have a look if how i played it follows the proper strategy for it.
I played a lot of gambits as white when i started putting my repertoire together so love having the initiative and am quite happy to sacrifice material...perhaps a little too happy
I'll have a look at the opening report function, sounds useful.
Thanks again everyone for your kind advice.
RP