an ordinary chessplayer wrote on 12/13/18 at 04:49:52:
I almost didn't answer you query, on the principle "if you don't have something nice to say, etc."
You should have gone with your initial inclination. But I get the sense that that is not your nature.
Quote:But who knows, maybe someone will be provoked to disagree with me and you can get some good answers.
Apparently not.
Quote:My 2 cents:
(1) A four years old child is too young to be playing a complicated game with older children. They need to be playing zero-strategy games like Go Fish or Crazy Eights to have any chance. Unless the game is completely rigged, probably with the open collusion of all the other children, the 4-yo is not going to get a good gift.
Wow, are you also an expert on everything, or just how my grandkids get along with each other?
Quote:(2) Never underestimate the human potential for all wanting the same thing at the same time, doubly so since it's quite obvious everybody else wants it.
I guess you are also an expert on psychology and human nature. Impressive.
Our family has played all kinds of games with kids of all ages. They all get along great. If there is a problem, we use it as a teaching moment, but they are rare. The older kids look out for the younger ones and the younger ones adore the older ones. No one gets
taken advantage of. And there is always adult supervision, not that it is needed all that often.
I'm sorry you had such a bad childhood experience. Maybe you could apply some of your psychology expertise to yourself.
I was hoping for some clever ideas for how to make the game more fun. Obviously, I've come to the wrong place. But we will muddle along somehow.
Never underestimate the human potential to be arrogant and dismissive.