Thank you for your reactions, they've given me valuable insights and ideas. 🙇♂️
I will start researching the QGA

somehow this opening escaped my attention for a very long time, but it seems like a perfect match.
Quote:First point, your performance with black is exactly what we would expect. Consider a 2330-player who scores 67% with white and 55% with black, this is 61% average, which predicts +78 Elo. Now let's look in the database, using ChessBase Big Database 2018:
WhiteElo from 2280 to 2380 vs BlackElo from 2202 to 2302
N34318 +15183 =13125 -6004 ?6 average: 65.6%
WhiteElo from 2202 to 2302 vs BlackElo from 2280 to 2380
N34229 +8113 =14649 -11465 ?2 average: 45.1%
True, the 55% is not so bad, I'd have to calculate my rating performances to get meaningful statistics. But maybe I'm not as bad with the Black pieces as I previously thought
Quote:You would be playing AGAINST an IQP a fair bit though -- I couldn't tell from your post if you wanted to having them or avoid them from both sides.
I prefer to avoid playing
with the IQP with the Black pieces, but playing against the IQP is completely fine.
Quote:Too bad about that second red bullet. Maybe you can get over it? Or just admit that black can't have everything he/she/they wants in the opening. Because otherwise the Tarrasch Defense perfectly fits the three green bullets and the first red one.
Absolutely! We need to make concessions in every opening repertoire, especially with the Black pieces. The Tarrasch is my back-up option now. It's indeed very forcing (i.e. White doesn't have many options) and there's some interesting new material on it too by Erwin l'Ami.
If the QGA works out for me, and if I'm happy with the repertoire, I might turn it into a Chessable course
Thanks again for sharing your insights and I'll let you know how the QGA works out for me. My first blitz games with the opening give reason for optimism but of course, they're just blitz games