cathexis wrote on 08/16/21 at 13:43:31:
@doefmat et al,
I was intrigued by your suggestion of the book, "Chess Structures." So I went over to Amazon to check it out as I always get ideas from the reviews, especially if the book is highly rated. This book has 146 ratings at about a 4.5/5 numbers. For Amazon, that's pretty good. But I found one review thought-provoking for this one comment within it:
Quote:The only way you gain something from the book is if you first amass some experience playing a certain structure, and you analyze your games, and keep accumulating experience about everything that can go wrong, everything that can go right, etc. Then you read this book, and draw upon your experience and relate what you now learn to your experiences in the past. It is only when you do that do[sic] you really understand, assimilate, and hopefully be able to apply what you learn in your future games. The mistake I made when I first read these chapters was to do it without the necessary experience.
Seems sensible and somewhat in-line with Topnotch's reply above. But it also could be interpreted as saying general books on the middlegame are of very limited use since planning will have to be based on structures specific to the various openings. And further, that you won't gain much understanding of those structures (and hence be very limited in planning abilities) until you have first accumulated a "book" of your own games, by a given opening, for study. For example, middlegame planning is less about general principles than studying the structures that arise from the 1, vs. the Petroff let's say. But, of course, you have to learn the 1 first. And what do we mean by "knowing the 1?" Seems like it could be an endless loop. This could be relevant to the OP's question. I wonder if forum members would care to comment on this?
P.S. Many of the reviews were very favorable, so no 'dis to any.
You are overthinking it. Play games, analyze them afterwards, learn from the experience and draw some conclusions. Rinse, repeat and re-calibrate where necessary.
You can't learn to swim by only reading a book, you have to take the plunge and do it. Overthinking leads to indecision and paralysis and a fear of playing practical games.
As the Nike motto goes: "Just do it!"
Postscript: I decided to share that for the first time in many years I have not renewed my subscription to chesspublishing.com. I have grown thoroughly disgusted with the lack of interaction between the columnist and the forum here and have re-directed my limited funds to chessable where the authors are expected to and do interact actively with the forum connected to it.
I wish Tony all the success going forward, but for me it has to be good-bye for now.