Sad news about Brenda. Bill won't live forever either, nor the CCA. Everything changes.
trw wrote on 02/26/22 at 17:38:40:
USCF is one of the worst organizations in existence.
People who say things like this don't understand what the USCF actually is, or how it is structured, or how it came to be like that. At one time the USCF had an executive director who wanted to close up the USCF sales. He gave a speech explaining why, saying in effect "It is not the mission of the USCF to provide discounted books and equipment to the USCF members." Then somebody in the audience pointed out that it's in the USCF constitution/charter/whatever, "the USCF shall provide books and equipment to the USCF members at a discount". The USCF is a member organization, but unlike other "member organizations" which are that in name only, in the USCF the members actually have the power to decide how things will be. For better or worse.
Anyway, the USCF is not the greatest organization ever. But the entire island of England/Scotland/Wales (three teams at the Olympiad) will fit in a corner of Texas, so it would be surprising if a national organization for England would operate on the same principles as a national organization for the USA. My point is that state level chess in the USA would be a better parallel for national level chess in Europe, for things like activity, travel, etc. And complaints about what a national federation should or shouldn't do might, in the USA, be better directed at a state organization.
I don't mind paying a yearly membership that I hardly use. It doesn't break my bank. Chess is one of my favorite things. The fact that the USCF exists at all is a big plus for me. I want it to be there for the day I do decide to play in a tournament....