Once again I split this into two posts. First one is diagnosis, second one is recommendation.
Marc Benford wrote on 07/30/26 at 03:59:01:
Quote:Goggle AI wrote:
The reason your build failed is because the makefile.unx file is written for Unix-like environments (Linux/macOS), and Windows command prompt natively lacks the touch utility. When mingw32-make tries to execute touch depend, Windows throws the error:
make (e=2): The system cannot find the file specified.
This is probably correct.
Recall that we had a similar problem with OsTyPe because it relied on the output of uname, another unix utility.
But, since I don't have MinGW installed, I don't know what unix commands it bundles. I am flying a little blind there and can only react to these errors as you report them.
You can check whether touch exists in your path. From the Windows command prompt run the following command:
touch --version Output that contains "not recognized as an internal or external command" means you don't have touch; output that contains version number, copyright, license, and author information means you do have touch. Obviously your fix for the touch error is different depending on which case is true.
But again, I think Google AI is probably correct that you don't have touch.
Marc Benford wrote on 07/30/26 at 03:59:01:
Quote:Goggle AI wrote:
Because you are using standard Windows command prompt, you can easily bypass this by telling the compilation tool to use the Windows-native file creation command instead of Unix's touch.
Follow these steps to successfully compile Popeye.
1. Fix the touch Error Natively
You do not need to install anything new. You just need to pass an extra variable to your make command so it translates touch into a Windows native command.
Run this exact command in your prompt:
cmdmingw32-make -f makefile.unx ToUcH="type nul >"
This is most definitely wrong. You are being advised to overwrite the file "depend" with an empty file of the same name, but touch only creates an empty file
if the file does not already exist. And it wouldn't work anyway, since the makefile recipe is running touch and ignoring ${ToUcH}, as you found when you tried make again.
You have a couple of options for fixing touch. See the recommendation post.
Marc Benford wrote on 07/30/26 at 03:59:01:
Quote:Goggle AI wrote:
2. If you see a gengmarr execute error
If the compiler throws an error right after that saying gengmarr is not recognized, it means Windows is trying to run a newly generated local program without explicitly knowing it is in the current directory. If that happens, force it to look locally by running:
cmdmingw32-make -f makefile.unx ToUcH="type nul >" CuRrPwD=./
Also wrong. CuRrPwD is already correctly being set to ./ which you can see from the make message "entering directory .../popeye-develop".
Marc Benford wrote on 07/30/26 at 03:59:01:
Quote:Goggle AI wrote:
you must tell the build system to stop using Unix commands and use Windows native settings.
Not true. Would be true if you were using a Windows compiler. But you are using MinGW as a fake unix environment. gcc under MinGW should use unix commands.
Marc Benford wrote on 07/30/26 at 03:59:01:
Quote:Goggle AI wrote:
(1) mingw32-make -f makefile.unx ToOlChAiN=mingw
(2) mingw32-make -f makefile.unx clean
(3a) mingw32-make -f makefile.w32
(3b) mingw32-make -f makefile.gcc
Weird.
(1) Your options for ToOlChAiN are limited to the directory names in the .../popeye-develop/toolchain folder. "mingw" is not one of the folders. There is a directory "cross-i586-mingw32msvc" which you could try as a value for toolchain. It also uses unix commands so will not fix your touch problem. Probably best to stick with the gcc toolchain.
(2) "clean" is a standard make target telling it to undo some of the changes from previous runs of make. You can find it on line 364 of makefile.unx. It's not a bad idea to run make clean, but again it won't fix your issue.
(3a) and (3b) These makefiles don't even exist, Google AI is just making stuff up.
So in practice Google AI is leading you away from the solution rather than towards it.