I do not agree, that the Boden Gambit and the Urussov Gambit lead to similar positions. In the Urussov Gambit there is an open e-file, which White can use for his attacking plans. When you consider to take up the Urussov Gambit I advise you to purchase at least two books:
Danish Dynamite by Müller and Voigt;
The fascinating King's Gambit by Johansson because of the transposition 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nc6 3.f4.
You might also want to buy books on the Evans Gambit because of 2.Bc4 Bc5 3.b4 and on the Four Knights Game because of 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nf3 Nc6.

The good new about the Boden Gambit, is that White has several move orders available:
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.Bc4 Nxe4 5.o-o.
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.Nc3.
1.e4 e5 2.Nc3 Nf6 3.Bc4 Nxe4 4.Nf3.
1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.Nf3 Nxe4 4.Nc3.

The bad news is, that White's play is highly dubious.
4...Nxc3 (there is no objection against Nc6 5.o-o Nxc3 see under) 5.dxc3 f6 (or Qe7 first) 6.Nh4 (6.o-o g6! or Nc6 with a transposition) g6 7.f4 (7.o-o c6!) Qe7 (c6 or Nc6 are playable too) 8.f5 Qg7! 9.o-o d6 and White has a hard time to open the necessary open lines.

Also in the Four Knights Game 5.o-o Black can play Nxc3 6.dxc3 f6 (Be7 is about equal) 7.Nh4 g6 8.f4 Qe7 with the same idea of meeting f4-f5 with Qe7-g7.
White struggles, probably in vain, for compensation.