Well, it seems the game was pretty controversial (see Neil MacDonald's comments in his French update).  I agree that it was not particularly brilliant by Radjabov - Gazza just blundered in a clearly better position - but it should not take away from the fact that the kid had to play pretty ingeniously even to give Kasparov the chance to go wrong so spectacularly.

I sympathise with Kasparov - I am sure that the motives he attributes to the judges are accurate - but does he think that acting in such a petulant manner will make it more or less likely that people will act in this way in the future?!

Really, the guy has achieved pretty much all there is to achieve in chess, he is still world no.1 and for many the greatest of all time.  Does he think that one game and one tournament will affect him so much?  Of course, hating to lose is one of the things that makes him great, but even so, on the basis of the reports it would have been difficult to tell which was the 15-year-old at that prizegiving.

What does everybody else reckon?

And he did not even turn 16 yet, did he? I saw reports saying he is 15.

By the way, right before that loss, there was an article published by Mig that Kasparov has lost only 1 game for the last 4 years!!