Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
Topic Tools
Very Hot Topic (More than 25 Replies) Englund Gambit (Read 63251 times)
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #83 - 02/16/08 at 18:47:11
Post Tools
Bonsai wrote on 02/15/08 at 23:50:28:
Markovich wrote on 02/15/08 at 16:45:22:
God, at least someone thought of an absurd gambit before Zilbermints did.

Oh, and please note: 1.d4 e5 2.f4 exd4 3.g4 is mine! Oh, and 1.d4 e5 2.b4 Bxb4+ 3.c3, which secures the d4 pawn with the gain of a tempo!


You two morons don't understand the ideas behind my gambits, else you would not come up with such imbecile comments. Jesus Christ!

OK, I'll explain it in simple English, so listen carefully, kindergarteners.
The move 3 b4 intends to first, take Black into unknown territory;
second, fianchetto the Bc1; third, offer a gambit pawn. Clear?

Now your gambit, Bonsai and Markovich, does nothing. After 1 d4 e5 2 f4 ed4 3 g4?? Qh4+ 4 Kd2 Black is clearly better. Instead, best is 3 Qxd4 Nc6 4 Qe4+ Be7 which at least looks more decent than what you proposed. 

1 d4 e5 2 b4 Bxb4+ 3 c3 Bd6 4 de5 Bxe5 5 Nf3 Bf6 and White has nothing to show for the pawn. 

Get real, guys! You two cannot understand my gambits. Nice try of trying to invent something, but it takes more than just fooling around
with pieces. It takes genius and inspiration.

I have both.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #82 - 02/15/08 at 23:50:28
Post Tools
Markovich wrote on 02/15/08 at 16:45:22:
God, at least someone thought of an absurd gambit before Zilbermints did.

Oh, and please note: 1.d4 e5 2.f4 exd4 3.g4 is mine! Oh, and 1.d4 e5 2.b4 Bxb4+ 3.c3, which secures the d4 pawn with the gain of a tempo!
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Markovich
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 6099
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Joined: 09/17/04
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #81 - 02/15/08 at 16:45:22
Post Tools
DoubledPawns wrote on 02/15/08 at 04:44:24:
After 1...e5, White can consider 2.Nf3 ed4 3.e4!? and now who's playing a gambit? Wink

2...e4 is also possible, but then 3.Nfd2! with the idea of encouraging 3...e3 looks very promising. For example, 3...d5 (3...f5 looks a bit Levish, pun intended) 4.c4 c6 5.Nc3 and White is better, at least according to my database of 1-minute games Grin


God, at least someone thought of an absurd gambit before Zilbermints did.
  

The Great Oz has spoken!
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
DoubledPawns
Senior Member
****
Offline


1.a3 e5 2.Nc3 Ba3 3.Ne4
Bf8 4.Ra5 Ke7 5.Re5#

Posts: 283
Joined: 02/01/08
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #80 - 02/15/08 at 04:44:24
Post Tools
After 1...e5, White can consider 2.Nf3 ed4 3.e4!? and now who's playing a gambit? Wink

2...e4 is also possible, but then 3.Nfd2! with the idea of encouraging 3...e3 looks very promising. For example, 3...d5 (3...f5 looks a bit Levish, pun intended) 4.c4 c6 5.Nc3 and White is better, at least according to my database of 1-minute games Grin
  

Wise men talk because they have something to say; fools, because they have to say something - Plato
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
sssthepro
Senior Member
****
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 439
Joined: 12/16/06
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #79 - 12/28/07 at 02:20:19
Post Tools
Can you create a playchess account? I can play with you on playchess Cheesy.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #78 - 12/23/07 at 04:32:26
Post Tools
Uberdecker wrote on 12/20/07 at 10:58:47:
That's just 'cause they're too chicken to face you Lev. They hide in their comfortable , familiar little settings instead of coming out into the open where they will have to face the Zilbermints Attack against the Zilbermints Defence to the Zilbermints Gambit in the Zilbermints Variation of the Zilbermints  Opening. And without their precious software to tell them what to do, they're completly naked, these cowards! Forget pratically, the game would be in the bag...


Hey Uberdeker,

Funny to hear you say "Zilbermints Attack against the Zilbermints Defense to the Zilbermints Variation of the Zilbermints Opening".
How convoluted... Perhaps what you mean is something like the Zilbermints Benoni (aka Zilbermints Variation of the Benoni Defense), 1 d4 c5 2 Nf3 cxd4 3 b4? Or the Zilbermints Gambit against the Euwe Defense in the Blackmar-Diemer Gambit?

  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
edgy
Junior Member
**
Offline


"Long ago he was one of
the singers"

Posts: 80
Location: New York
Joined: 08/09/04
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #77 - 12/20/07 at 16:07:11
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 12/19/07 at 20:23:25:
I appreciate your informing me of these events, but here is the key problem: the entry fees are very high, something like anywhere between $197- $200+ . Then there is the hotel and food. This adds up to a very pretty chunk of money, around $1500 or more. Not everyone can afford this. I can't.


So now you've shifted your groundfrom "there are no tournaments" to "I can't afford them".  Uh huh.

Cost should be nowhere near $1500.  Take the Liberty Bell Open in January: $99 entry fee, $91 hotel for three nights and it's in the middle of the city, so you don't have to pay hotel prices for food.  That's a total of $500, max--assuming you stay in the tournament hotel and don't even share a room;  under $300 if you share a room with even one other person or take a first round bye (cuts one night off the stay) or find a cheaper hotel.

Things like the World Open and Philadeplphia International are longer and more expensive, but you can still dramatically cut costs by sharing a room.  Could probably do them for under $700.  Plus you might win a prize by dazzling the masters with your daring gambit innovations (just to bring this back to the thread topic).
  

Caissa have mercy on a miserable patzer: http://altergoniff.blogspot.com
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Uberdecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 641
Joined: 03/21/06
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #76 - 12/20/07 at 10:58:47
Post Tools
That's just 'cause they're too chicken to face you Lev. They hide in their comfortable , familiar little settings instead of coming out into the open where they will have to face the Zibermints Attack against the Zilbermints Defence to the Zilbermints Gambit in the Zilbermints Variation of the Zilbermints  Opening. And without their precious software to tell them what to do, they're completly naked, these cowards! Forget pratically, the game would be in the bag...
« Last Edit: 12/20/07 at 12:16:56 by Uberdecker »  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #75 - 12/20/07 at 03:05:03
Post Tools
MUBAs Opponent wrote on 12/19/07 at 23:24:03:
Gambit wrote on 12/19/07 at 20:23:25:
I am not afraid of taking on  Anand or Kramnik!

Of course, just so long as you play the Zilbermints Benoni against them, the game will practically be in the bag already.


Assuming either of them shows up to play in tournaments where I play, and that is far from certain. These guys play in super-tournaments like Linares, not club championships.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
MUBAs Opponent
Junior Member
**
Offline


I Love ChessPublishing!

Posts: 70
Joined: 02/06/07
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #74 - 12/19/07 at 23:24:03
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 12/19/07 at 20:23:25:
I am not afraid of taking on  Anand or Kramnik!

Of course, just so long as you play the Zilbermints Benoni against them, the game will practically be in the bag already.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #73 - 12/19/07 at 20:23:25
Post Tools
I appreciate your informing me of these events, but here is the key problem: the entry fees are very high, something like anywhere between $197- $200+ . Then there is the hotel and food. This adds up to a very pretty chunk of money, around $1500 or more. Not everyone can afford this. I can't.

With regard to the December 27-30 tournaments, I already have planned to spend time with my family, so I won't be able to make it.
As I will be attending school next semester, I will be busy studying.
Now, about the 2007 Marshall Chess Club championship. You are right, I did not play in the qualifier, and thus was not able to play. Next year might be different, though.

The big tournaments pose a significant challenge in that it takes a lot of money -- entry fees, hotel, food, purchases -- just to play in them.
Never mind my opponents -- I am not afraid of taking on  Anand or Kramnik! -- but finances is a key problem for me, who has a fixed income.

So, while I appreciate your information, edgy, it is not as easy as you think.

Happy Hoildays and a Merry New Year!
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
edgy
Junior Member
**
Offline


"Long ago he was one of
the singers"

Posts: 80
Location: New York
Joined: 08/09/04
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #72 - 12/18/07 at 16:20:08
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 12/18/07 at 05:14:15:


Most FIDE tournaments are too far away for me to participate in. They are either in South America, Europe, California, Midwest... anywhere but the NJ/NY area. And even when there is a FIDE tournament around, something comes up and my calendar does not permit me to play. 

Let me know when there is a FIDE tournament in the area, will you?
But for that, I would have a FIDE rating.

Thanks.


Ridiculous.  You live in New Jersey.  There's no place in the world where it's easier to get a FIDE rating than the NY/NJ area.

I see you just missed the Edward Lasker Memorial at the Marshall Chess Club in NY (though you would have had to play a qualifying tournament). Here's the crosstable: http://marshallchessclub.org/mccch07.htm.  Note that only three players lacked FIDE ratings.  All three are little kids.

Anyway.  Most of the big Open tournaments have FIDE-rated Open sections.  You'd have to play at least 3 games with FIDE-rated players, but these are 6 to 9 round tournaments, and rated players are thick on the ground.  Do you really not know this already?

Coming up:  The Eastern Open in Washington DC, December 27-30;   or the Empire State  Open in Sratoga NY the same weekend (I'd think DC is easier to get to);  the Liberty Bell Open in Philadelphia, January 18-21; the Foxwoods Open in Massachussetts in March.  In June/July, you have the Philadelphia International, followed immediately by the World Open.   Later in the year, the Fall Futurity at the Marshall should be on in 2008 unless the roof falls in again, and there's the National Congress in Philadelphia over Thanksgiving.  Play two of those--three at most--and you should have 9 games for an initial FIDE rating.

Oh, and there's a FIDE-rated weekend tournament at the Marshall almost every month, though it's slightly hard to get 3 rated opponents in a 4-round tournament unless you're playing pretty well.

Seriously, in the NY/NJ area, it's hard to avoid getting a FIDE rating these days, unless you only play in quickplays.

Sheesh.
  

Caissa have mercy on a miserable patzer: http://altergoniff.blogspot.com
Back to top
WWW  
IP Logged
 
Uberdecker
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 641
Joined: 03/21/06
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #71 - 12/18/07 at 12:04:09
Post Tools
Bonsai wrote on 12/18/07 at 07:53:53:

So I conclude that contrary to your claims above you in fact do not have the CM title?


Does such a ridiculous thing really exist ?! If so, I think we can hardly blame Lev for not knowing. Let's not give him such a hard time.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Bonsai
God Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 622
Joined: 03/13/04
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #70 - 12/18/07 at 07:53:53
Post Tools
Gambit wrote on 12/18/07 at 05:14:15:

But for that, I would have a FIDE rating.

So I conclude that contrary to your claims above you in fact do not have the CM title?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Gambit
God Member
*****
Offline


I love ChessPublishing
.com!

Posts: 1397
Location: Newark
Joined: 07/26/05
Gender: Male
Re: Englund Gambit
Reply #69 - 12/18/07 at 05:14:15
Post Tools
Bonsai wrote on 12/17/07 at 19:19:25:
Gambit wrote on 12/17/07 at 13:37:43:

This has nothing to do with online-bullet-ratings -- although that might indicate my blitz strength -- but OTB ratings.

You don't even seem to have a FIDE rating...


Most FIDE tournaments are too far away for me to participate in. They are either in South America, Europe, California, Midwest... anywhere but the NJ/NY area. And even when there is a FIDE tournament around, something comes up and my calendar does not permit me to play. 

Let me know when there is a FIDE tournament in the area, will you?
But for that, I would have a FIDE rating.

Thanks.
  
Back to top
YIM  
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 ... 7
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo