Latest Updates:
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Tartakower QGD (Read 22396 times)
killbill
Guest


Re: Tartakower QGD
Reply #2 - 08/07/04 at 10:00:07
Post Tools
The Tartakover is an excellent backbone for playing the QGD. It is also easy to add the Nimzo to your repetoire. Look at the games and move orders of Nigel Short's games. Kramnik was also playing the Tartakover a few years ago with good results.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
kevinludwig
Full Member
***
Offline


I love ChessPublishing.com!

Posts: 233
Location: Los Angeles
Joined: 06/13/04
Re: Tartakower QGD
Reply #1 - 07/30/04 at 18:40:22
Post Tools
I think you can use the Tartakower as your main defence, but you will need to have something also prepared for:
1) QGD Exchange variation
2) Catalan
3) Colle
4) Stonewall
5) Torre (maybe)
6) Tromp or Pseudo-Tromp
7) London system
8) BGD (maybe)

I say maybe on the Torre because that depends on the move order that you choose, and same for Tromp or Pseudo-Tromp.

For example, after 1. d4 Nf6 2. Bg5 is the Tromp, but if you go with 1. d4 d5 2. Bg5 is the pseudo-tromp. Also, 1. d4 Nf6 2. Nf3 e6 3. Bg5 d5 is the Torre, but 1. d4 d5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. Bg5 is NOT a torre, because 3. ...Ne4 is a good line for black.

Also, you may consider adopting a move order that discourages (or prevents) white from playing a QGD exchange with Nge2, because this setup is more aggressive than the lines with Nf3. You can discourage it with the move order: 1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 e6, since white may not be interested in going into a Nimzo indian, and may play 3. Nf3 here. Or you could try to prevent the Nge2 lines altogether with the move order 1. d4 d5 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 Be7, (normal is Nf6 when white pins the f6 knight with Bg5), so now I think white chooses between 4. Bf4 and 4. Nf3.

In answer to your original question, I have no idea why the Slav gets more attention in books than the Tartakower. But possibly because they are apples and oranges. What I mean is that the Tartakower is a system within the QGD, so usually you will find it in a book on the QGD. But the Slav is an opening itself (like the QGD), not a system within some other opening. So usually you find Slav books. If in your question you meant that books dedicated to sub-variations of the Slav are more prevalent than books on sub-variations of the QGD, this may also be correct...but I'm really not sure why that would be.

Also, the list of other openings that you would need to be prepared for is pretty much the same regardless of whether you choose the Slav or the QGD Tartakower. The only difference is that instead of the QGD exchange, you would have to know the Slav Exchange...

Hopefully something here has been helpful to you.

Kevin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Scott Rex
Guest


Tartakower QGD
07/30/04 at 17:13:05
Post Tools
Hello everybody,

I have a quick (and probably naive) question regarding the QGD Tartakower variation.  As I've tried to choose my response as black to d4, I have looked through a couple of books on the QGD and on the Slav.  I like both systems, and I'm particularly interested in the QGD Tartakower.  My questions is this: Can the Tartakower form the backbone of my black 1.d4 repertoire?  There are several books on the Slav, but the Tartakower is usually nothing more than a chapter or two in a larger book on the QGD.  Is there a reason for this?  Is the Tartakower just a subsystem that black can be forced out of easily?  Or can it be a player's main defense?

Thank you again for your time,
Scott Rex
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 [2] 
Topic Tools
Bookmarks: del.icio.us Digg Facebook Google Google+ Linked in reddit StumbleUpon Twitter Yahoo